The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using dfc345 fx

1

Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Representative images of each sample were acquired using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse TS100 with digital camera Nikon DXM1200F or Leica DM5500B with digital camera Leica DFC345 FX) for immunolabeling quantification. For sciatic nerve samples, five random fields were chosen from two tissue sections immediately distal to the crush site and up to 5 mm from the lesion (S1A Fig). For the spinal cords, one field from each section was photographed in the ventral horn, in the area affected by the nerve transection (S1B Fig). Four sections per sample were obtained from the middle of the lumbar intumescenses. Pictures were analyzed with the ImageJ software (version 1.45s, National Institute of Health, USA), and the integrated density of pixels (IDP) was obtained by applying the enhance contrast and density slicing feature in a fixed area. Then, the IDP mean value of each sample was used, and data were expressed as the ratio of the operated groups to their respective controls (non-operated). For orthogonal projections (where indicated), images were acquired using a fluorescence microscope (Leica DM5500B with digital camera Leica DFC345 FX), and the z stack varied from 30 to 40 layers. The projections were done following 3D deconvolution (total interactions: 10; refractive index: 1.52), and both were performed using the Leica LAS AF software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor Immunofluorescence for Co-Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate if CD68 and CD16, CD16 and CX3CR1 or CD16 and CCR2 are co-expressed by cells in situ, double-labelling immunofluorescence stainings were performed. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded TAB tissue was deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed. Dilutions (1:50) of anti-CD68, anti-CD16, anti-CCR2, or anti-CX3CR1 antibodies were added and incubated overnight. Following washing, FITC-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG (A11008, Lifetechnologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and AF555-labeled donkey anti-mouse IgG (A31570, Lifetechnologies) were used as the secondary antibodies, respectively. DAPI (10236276001, Roche Life Science, Penzberg, Upper Bavaria, Germany) was performed to stain nuclei. Images were taken using Leica DFC345 FX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

mTOR Inhibitor Effects on N-HCC25 Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
N-HCC25 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s (DMEM) containing 10 % FBS, 4.5 g/L D-glucose, 4 mM glutamine, and 1 % penicillin/streptomycin (full medium [FM]) at 37 °C in a humidified 5 % CO2 atmosphere. All of the cell culture plastics used in subsequent experiments were coated with collagen A (0.1 mg/mL). The wash steps were conducted with PBS. Cells were detached by incubation with 2 mL trypsine/EDTA (0.05 %/0.02 % in PBS, without Ca2+/Mg2+) for 20 min. at 37 °C. Cells stained with 0.4% trypan blue were counted under light microscope (DM IL LED Fluo, Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) in a Neubauer chamber. Pictures of cell culture were taken with DFC345 FX from Leica. First generation (Everolimus) and second generation mTOR inhibitors (KU-0063794) dissolved in DMSO (Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) were applied (Absource Diagnostics GmbH, Munich, Germany) to test the influence of mTOR on cell proliferation of N-HCC25 cells. Concentrations and incubation times are provided in the materials and methods section of each experiment. The control cells were cultured in full medium (FM control) or received DMSO as vehicle treatment (DMSO control).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying NET and DAT in CUDC-907-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IGR-NB8 cells were seeded on coverslips coated with poly-l-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) in 24-well cell culture plates and treated with CUDC-907 for 48 h. NET and DAT proteins were revealed after incubation with primary antibodies (ref. NET17-1 and ab1766) and Alexa FluorTM-coupled secondary antibodies (ref. A11001 and A 11008, anti-mouse and anti-rabbit respectively) from ThermoFischer. Specificity was assessed by primary antibody omission. The immunofluorescence protocol is described elsewhere [22 (link)]. Cells were imaged using a fluorescence microscope (Leica DFC 345 FX) and then analyzed with LAS AF Lite software (Version 2.6.0, build 7266). Signal was quantified using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescent Imaging of C. elegans Neuromuscular Termination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of GFP, mCherry or SNB-1::GFP, live animals were anesthetized using 1% (v/v) 1-phenoxy-2-propanol in M9 buffer and visualized using a 40× magnification oil-immersion lens and an epifluorescent microscope (Leica CFR5000). A CCD camera (Leica DFC345 FX) was used for documentation. Images were analyzed and scale bars applied using Leica Application Suite for Advanced Fluorescence (LAS-AF) software. Termination defects were quantified by manually scoring juIs76 (Punc-25::GFP) for dorsal cord tips, and bggIs6 (Punc-25::mCherry) for DD5. Each genotype was quantitated by manually scoring three counts of 10 to 20 animals from two or more independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopy-based Quantitative Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital photomicrographs were captured under bright-field (DIC) or fluorescent light (fluorescence IHC) using a Leica DFC345FX camera attached to a Leica DMI8 microscope using Leica Application Suite X (LASX) imaging software (ver. 2.0.0.14332.2). All analyses were performed on a minimum of three eyes per genotype and a minimum of three photomicrographs per eye. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t-tests (to compare two samples) or one-way ANOVA (for multiple sample comparisons, with a Tukey post hoc analysis) using GraphPad Prism Software version 5.0 (GraphPad Software). Error bars represent standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing RPM-1::GFP Expression in Live Worms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of RPM-1::GFP, live adult animals were anesthetized using Levamisole in M9 buffer and visualized using an epifluorescent microscope (Leica CFR5000) with a 40× magnification oil-immersion lens. Images were acquired using a CCD camera (Leica DFC345 FX). Ten animals per strain were observed across two independent days with representative images shown in Figure 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromosome Analysis with Leica Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromosome preparations were analyzed under a Leica DM 4000B microscope with a 100x objective. Images were taken with a Leica DFC 345 FX camera using Leica Application Suite 3.7 software with an Image Overlay module.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comet Assay Protocol for DNA Damage Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neutral comet assays were performed using CometAssay (Trevigen) according to the manufacturer's protocol with minor modifications (Carvajal-Maldonado et al., 2019 (link)). Upon harvesting, cells were suspended at 3×105 cells/ml in cold PBS before combining with LMAgarose (Trevigen, 4250-50-050-02), spread onto a comet slide (Trevigen, 4250-200-03) and allowed to dry. Slides were placed in lysis solution (Trevigen, 4250-050-01) at 4°C for 1 h. Lysed slides were immersed in 1× TBE buffer (0.1 M Tris base, 0.1 M boric acid, 2.5 mM EDTA) for 30 min before electrophoresis at 25 V for 30 min at 4°C. Slides were washed in DNA precipitate solution (1 M ammonium acetate, 95% EtOH) for 30 min, followed by a fixing step in 70% ethanol for 30 min, and dried overnight at RT. Comets were stained with 1× SYBR Gold (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min. Images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope (Leica DMU 4000B; 63×/1.40-0.60 NA oil) with a Leica DFC345FX camera. At least 150 comets were scored in each experiment using the OpenComet plugin in the ImageJ analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Spinal Cord Immunomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence was evaluated in three representative alternate sections of the lumbar spinal cord per specimen. After blocking with 3% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in 0.1 M PB for 45 min, slides were incubated with primary antibodies against GFAP, Iba1, synaptophysin, MHC-I, GAD65, VGLUT-1, and AMPA receptor (Table 3) diluted in an incubation solution (1.5% BSA and 0.2% Tween in 0.01 M PB) and incubated for 4 h at room temperature. After washing with 0.01 M PB, the secondary antibodies (Table 3) were applied and incubated for 45 min. Sections were then rinsed in 0.01 M PB and mounted in a mixture of glycerol/PB (3:1).
For quantification, one image of each side (right and left) was acquired for each slide, totaling 3 per animal, using a Leica fluorescence microscope (DM 5500, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a digital camera (DFC 345 FX, Wetzlar, Germany) using specific filters according to the secondary antibodies. A quantitative evaluation of labeling was carried out using the integrated density of pixel measurements in a fixed area corresponding to the ventral horn (Figure 1), as described by Oliveira et al. (2004) (link).
Quantification was performed with ImageJ software (version 1.33u, National Institutes of Health, USA). The integrated density of pixels was calculated for each image, and the mean value for each experimental animal was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!