The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stm200

Manufactured by Biopac
Sourced in United States

The STM200 is a force transducer designed to measure tension, compression, and other mechanical forces. It features a robust construction and a wide measurement range to accommodate a variety of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using stm200

1

Electrical Shock Threat Conditioning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An electrical shock (50 milliseconds) delivered to the right wrist served as the unconditioned stimulus for both groups. Electrical shocks were delivered via electrodes connected to a constant voltage stimulator (STM 200, BIOPAC Systems). The intensity of the shock was calibrated for each participant in a stepwise manner, starting from a low barely perceptible setting and ending at a level that the participant rated as being “highly annoying and unpleasant, but not painful”, based on the protocols of prior threat conditioning studies (Dunsmoor et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrical Stimulation for Unpleasant but Not Painful Sensation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The US consisted of a 100-ms DC-pulse electric stimulation, which was administered using a constant voltage stimulator (STM200; BIOPAC Systems) applied to the participant’s right forearm through a surface electrode. A conductive gel (Sigma Gel) was applied between the electrode and the skin. Before the start of each experiment, the level of the US was individually adjusted to be “unpleasant but not painful” (experiment 1: range 24 to 56 mA, mean = 36.7 mA, SD = 9.12; experiment 2: range 15.7 to 41.1 mA, mean = 29.39 mA, SD = 7.63), and participants were asked to rate the unpleasantness of the US on a scale reaching from between 1 (“not unpleasant at all”) to 10 (“extremely unpleasant”; experiment 1: range 2 to 9, mean = 5.70, SD = 1.43; experiment 2: range 1 to 7, mean = 3.64, SD = 1.45).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Facial Stimuli in Aversive Conditioning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six different pictures depicting neutral male faces served as CSs; two faces were Central African (Olsson and Phelps, 2004 (link)), two faces were North European and two faces were Middle-Eastern (Moroccan) decent (Delgado et al., 2006 (link)). Faces from the different categories were matched on ratings of aggressiveness, attractiveness, and masculinity based on pilot data collected in an independent sample prior to the experiment. Stimuli were presented in a pseudo randomized order with the criterion that there could be no more than two trials of the same CS in a row throughout the experiment. A white fixation cross was shown on a black background during the inter-trial intervals (ITIs), the duration of which varied between 11 and 15 s (M = 13) throughout the experiment. The experiment was run in a sound-attenuated chamber on a desktop PC with a standard 21-inch cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor. Screen resolution was 800 × 600 pixels and the refresh rate was set to 60 Hz. The experiment was programmed in Presentation 13.1 (Neurobehavioral Systems1). Participants viewed pictures at a distance of about 1 m. The US was a 100 ms monopolar DC-pulse electric stimulation (STM200; Biopac Systems Inc.2) applied to the participant’s right wrist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Associative Learning with Conditioned Stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was a within-subjects 2-d experiment separated by ∼24 h. Conditioned stimuli were pictures of animals, tools, and food on a white background obtained from the website www.lifeonwhite.com or publicly available sources on the internet. The US was a 6 msec electrical shock delivered to the right wrist from the BIOPAC (Goleta, CA) STM200 and calibrated before the session to a level deemed “highly annoying but not painful.” Trial order was pseudorandomized such that no more than three pictures of the same category appeared in a row. The task was presented using E-Prime 2.0 and consisted of a trial-unique category conditioning design, meaning that each trial was a different basic-level exemplar with a unique name. For example, there were no two different pictures of a monkey. Pictures of common phobic stimuli (e.g., spiders, snakes, weapons) or highly appealing food images were not used in the CS set. CSs were on the screen for 6 sec, followed by a 6–8 sec waiting period with a fixation cross on a white background. On each trial, subjects rated expectancy for the shock using a two-alternative forced choice rating scale. Subjects were not instructed about the CS–US contingencies, but were told that if they paid attention then they might learn an association between the pictures and the shock.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Retinal Function Post-Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ERG was performed 7 days after treatment. The rats were first adapted by keeping them for 30 minutes in the dark. Subsequently, the animals were anesthetized and corneal silver electrode was placed on the cornea, the reference needle electrode (#EL452, Biopac System, Goleta, CA, USA) was placed subcutaneously in the region of the skull and ground needle electrode (#EL450, Biopac System) was placed subcutaneously at the base of the tail (Shabelnikova et al., 2016). A stroboscope TSD122B with a flash of white light connected to the stimulator (#STM200, Biopac System) was placed in front of the animal. Evoked biopotentials were amplified using ERS100C Evoked Response Amplifier (#ERS100C, Biopac System). An MP150 data acquisition and analysis system (#MP150, Biopac Systems) was used to represent them graphically. Each rat was subjected to only a single stimulation of 0.5 seconds to obtain the ERG recording. Changes in the amplitudes of the a- and b-waves of ERG were used to assess the functional state of the retina after pre-treatment with MgAT and NMDA exposure. The readings from each group of eight animals were included into the protocol and used to calculate the mean.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Facial Stimuli and Skin Conductance in Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CSs consisted of three pictures of Caucasian male faces with neutral facial expressions, from the NimStim Set of Facial Expressions (Models: 23, 28, 36; Tottenham et al., 2009 (link)). Electrical stimulation was delivered through a pair of Ag electrodes of 20 × 25 mm with a fixed interelectrode mid-distance of 45 mm. Shock deliverance was controlled by a monopolar DC-pulse electric stimulation (STM200; Biopac Systems Inc., www.biopac.com). Between the electrodes and the skin, a conductive gel (Signa, Parker) was applied. For SCR assessment two Ag/AgCl electrodes of 20 × 16 mm were attached with to the medial phalanges of the first and third fingers of the non-preferred hand. The physiological signals were amplified and recorded using BIOPAC Systems (Santa Barbara, CA) hardware at a rate of 250 samples per second. Data were analyzed using AcqKnowledge software (BIOPAC Systems). Participants sat in front of a standard 21-inch cathode ray tube (CRT1) monitor (100 cm distance) in a sound attenuated chamber. The resolution of the screen was 800 × 600 pixels with a refresh rate of 60 Hz. The experiment was presented in E-Prime 2.0 (Schneider et al., 2002 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electric Shock as Aversive Conditioning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An electric shock was used as UCS (Meir Drexler et al., 2015 (link), 2016 (link); Meir Drexler and Wolf, 2017b (link); Haaker et al., 2019 (link)). A constant voltage stimulator (STM200; BIOPAC Systems Inc., Goleta, CA, USA) was used to deliver transcutaneous electrical stimulation (100 ms) through two Ag/AgCl electrodes (0.5 cm2 surface) filled with isotonic (0.05 M NaCl) electrolyte medium (Synapse Conductive Electrode Cream, Kustomer Kinetics Inc., Arcadia, CA, USA) placed on the left shin. The participants were asked to rate the UCS on a 1–7 scale (1 = not uncomfortable; 7 = very uncomfortable) at four time points during the study: after the shock workup procedure and after acquisition training on day 1, after reactivation (only reactivation groups) on day 2, and after reinstatement test on day 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!