The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti cd133

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of hDPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining in hDPCs was performed as previously described [37 (link)]. Briefly, hDPCs were treated with rhIGFBP-1 (100 ng/ml) for 2 days. The cells were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution at room temperature for 30 minutes, permeabilized in 2.5% Tween 20 (cat. no. 9005-64-5, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 5 min, then incubated overnight at 4℃ with anti-ALP (1:500, cat. no. SC-15065, Santa Cruz), anti-β-catenin (1:500, cat. no. BD610154, BD Biosciences), anti-CD 133 (cat. no. NB120-16518, Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), anti-IGF-1 (cat. no. SC-9013 Santa Cruz), or anti-IGFBP-1 (cat. no. sc25257, Santa Cruz) primary antibody in blocking solution (1:1000). After several washes with PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 0.5% BSA, the hDPCs were incubated with anti-rabbit Cy2 (cat. no. 711-225-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., PA, USA) or anti-mouse (cat. no. 715-165-150; Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc.) labeled secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT. Following nuclear staining with DAPI dye (Sigma-Aldrich), the fluorescence signals were viewed using a Zeiss confocal laser microscope (LSM 700; Zeiss, Heidelberg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of hcMSC Surface Antigens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BM aspirates were taken from the iliac crest of a healthy male donor after informed consent was provided (approved by the INHA University Medical School Institutional Review Board; IRB Number 10-51). Isolation of hcMSCs was carried out as previously described (21 (link)). Several cell surface antigens on the established hcMSC line, named KBHD502, were characterized by flow cytometry. The antibodies used for the analysis were anti-CD14, anti-CD29, anti-CD31, anti-CD34, anti-CD44, anti-CD73, anti-CD90, anti-CD105, anti-CD119, anti-CD133, anti-CD166, anti-HLA class I, anti-HLA-DR, anti-Stro-1, anti-c-Met, and anti-c-Kit (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA). The cells were analyzed in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Isotype-matched control antibodies were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Cancer Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from both adherent and sphere cultures were dissociated into single cells, washed and suspended in PBS. For the identification of cell surface markers, the cells were labelled with anti-CD24, anti-CD44, anti-CD133, or anti-ALDH1 and secondary fluorescein (FITC)- or APC-conjugated antibodies (BD Pharmingen, CA, USA). Flow cytometry was performed on a FACScan system (BD FACSAria™, BD Biosciences, CA, USA). Annexin V for apoptosis analysis: Apoptosis in treated cells was assessed using an Annexin V/FITC Apoptosis Detection kit (BD Bioscience, MA, USA). The cells were stained with PE, Annexin V and 7-amino-actinomycin (7-AAD) and incubated for 15 min in the dark.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blotting for Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed according to a previous study [22 (link)]. Protein lysates were prepared, subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred onto PVDF membranes and blotted according to standard methods using anti-BMI1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-CD44 (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), anti-CD133 (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and anti-SOX2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); an anti-α-tubulin monoclonal antibody (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) served as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!