The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using cd106

1

Characterizing hBMSC Surface Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analysis was performed to evaluate the surface markers of hBMSCs. The hBMSCs cultured with PL in CPC were suspended with PBS containing 3% FCS. They were incubated with either a mouse monoclonal antibody against human CD19 (R&D Systems; dilution, 1 : 100), CD44 (R&D Systems; 1 : 100), CD45 (R&D Systems; 1 : 100), CD90 (R&D Systems; 1 : 100), CD105 (R&D Systems; 1 : 100), CD106 (R&D Systems; 1 : 100), CD146 (R&D Systems; 1 : 100), CD166 (R&D Systems; 1 : 100), or each mouse isotypic control for 30 min on ice. Cell suspensions were then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1 : 200) for 30 min on ice. Flow cytometric analysis was performed after two washes using a cytometer (Attune® Acoustic Focusing Cytometer, Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Live events (10,000) were acquired for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunophenotyping of Stem Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to confirm the identity of cells isolated and cultured by the aforementioned method, immunofluorescence using a panel of cell markers for SMSCs was performed. Positive and negative markers were selected based on a literature review 18. Cells were plated in four‐chamber slides and allowed to achieve 60% confluence. The cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and blocked with 4% paraformaldehyde (VWR, Radnor, PA), 0.1% Triton X‐100 (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma‐Aldrich). Cells were incubated overnight with primary antibodies against CD31 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD44, CD45, CD90, CD105, CD106, and STRO‐1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), followed by incubation with a secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). In order to more specifically confirm the identity of these cells, costaining was performed using a similar protocol with antibodies against CD90 (R&D Systems) and CD44 (Abcam). Secondary antibodies for costaining were Alexa Fluor 488 and 594, respectively (ThermoFisher Scientific). All images were obtained using a Keyence BZ‐X700 (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of Mouse MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2M WT and CKIP-1 KO mice were executed by cervical dislocation. The tibias and femurs were immediately dissected from the attached muscles and tissues using aseptic techniques. The ends of the bones were removed, marrow plugs were flushed by repeated pipetting, and the cells were forcefully passed through a 19-gauge needle to obtain a single-cell suspension. The cells were cultured in a growth medium containing α-minimum eagle's medium (α-MEM; Invitrogen, Beijing, China) made of 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin. The cell suspensions were seeded in 10-cm tissue culture dishes and cultured in growth medium in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. The culture media were changed every 2 to 3 days to remove non-adherent cells, and adherent cells were grown until they were confluent. At last, MSCs were sub-cultured after digestion with 0.25% trypsin and 1 mol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Yaji Bio-technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). A fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was used to analyze the expression of CD44, CD90, CD106, CD34, and CD45 (R&D Systems, Fushen Bio-technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer's protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Isolated Alveolar Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to examine the purity of isolated AFMSCs by detection CD44, stem cell antigen 1 (Sca-1), CD105 (eBioscience), CD34, CD90 (BD Biosciences), CD29, CD11b, CD73, CD106, and CD45 (R&D Systems) expression on the cell surface as described in Peng et al. [29 (link)] (Additional file 2: Figure S1E). To confirm the percentage of differentiated AFMSCs towards LEPLCs, we detect the presence of TTF-1, SP-C, AQP-5, and CCSP in cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, detached cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 15 min, blocked with 4% BSA in PBS for 1 h, and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following intracellular marker antibodies at appropriate dilutions: TTF-1 (Abcam, 1:250 dilution), SP-C, AQP-5, and CCSP (Millipore, all at 1:250 dilutions). The cells were then incubated with an appropriate Alexa Fluor® 546 dye-conjugated secondary antibody (1:200) at room temperature for 2 h. After rinsing the cells twice, fluorescence was detected and analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCalibur).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of hBMMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary human BMMSCs were isolated as previously described [16 (link)]. The sample collection was conformed to protocol approved by the ethical authorities at the 3201 Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University. The experiment was conducted with the donors' or subjects' understanding and consent, as well as a statement that the responsible Ethical Committee has approved the experiments.
First, healthy bone marrow samples were collected from 5 donors, aged from 18 to 30 years, undergoing the alveolar bone cleft repair by autoilium transplantation. 1 mL bone marrow aspirates were seeded into a 10 cm culture dish and added 20 mL α-MEM (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 15% FBS (Gibco, BRL), then incubated in 5% CO2, 37°C. Cells from 3–5 passages were used in the experiments.
Second, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was used for analyzing CD45, CD34, CD14, CD29, CD44, CD90, and CD106 (R&D Systems, Inc.). Multiple colony-derived hMSCs at 2–4 passages were used in our experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of rBMSCs by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Passage 3 rBMSCs were collected after 0.25% trypsin (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) treatment and washed with PBS for three times. The cell concentration was adjusted to 1.0x106 cells/ml, and incubated for 25-30 min with antibodies against the following cell surface antigens: CD29 (dilution, 1:50; cat. no. AF2405; R&D Systems), CD106 (dilution, 1:40; cat. no. ab134047; Abcam), CD34 (dilution, 1:50; cat. no. ab81289; Abcam) and CD45 (dilution, 1:50; cat. no. ab10558; Abcam). Cells were washed three times and incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-goat (dilution, 1:200; cat. no. ab6881; Abcam) or FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit (dilution, 1:200; cat. no. ab6717; Abcam) secondary antibodies. Flow cytometry was performed using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.), and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software (version 10.4.2; FlowJo LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!