The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti ccr5 pe

1

Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following Abs were used for short-term culture or surface marker and ICS for flow cytometry (all Abs were from Biolegend): anti-CD3-PerCP-cy5.5, anti-CD8-APC-Cy7, anti-CD4-PE-Cy7, anti-CCR5-PE, anti-CXCR3-APC, anti-CXCR4-PE, anti-CCR7-APC, anti-granzyme A-PE, anti-Perforin-APC, anti-IFN-γ-PE, and anti-TNF-α-APC. The reagents listed below were all commercial products: brefeldin A (GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences), Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences), and Perm buffer (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Murine CCR5 Lentiviral Transduction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Murine CCR5 was cloned in the pLV lentiviral vector. Correct insertion and sequence were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The lentiviral particles were produced as described elsewhere (Grolla et al., 2015) in HEK293T cells transfected with pMDLg/pRRE, pMD2.VSVG, pRSV-Rev, and pLV-CCR5/pLV-empty plasmids. Briefly, after 48 h, cell medium was collected, filtrated, and centrifuged for 90 min at 100,000 g. The viral particles were resuspended and used to infect HeLa cells, after virus titration. Stable scramble (HeLa-SCR) and HeLa-CCR5 were stained with anti-CCR5 PE (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 min at 4°C, then washed twice in PBS and the relative expression of CCR5 analyzed using by flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Activated PBMC Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-activated bbPBMCs seeded at 4 X 106 were treated in vitro with the indicated ligands for 7 days in full RPMI containing 10% (v/v) cs-FCS, 2mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mg/mL sodium pyruvate, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 30 U/mL IL-2, while hPBMCs were thawed and rested overnight in full RPMI in an incubator at 37°C. Cells were washed with 1 X PBS containing 1% cs-FCS and subsequently stained with anti-human CD3 FITC (300306), anti-CD4 PE-DAZZLE 594 (357412), anti-CD8 PE/Cy5 (300910), anti-CD14 APC (325608), anti-CCR5 PE (359106), anti-CD69 PE/Cy7 (310912) and the viability dye, ZOMBIE NIR (423113) (Biolegend, USA), for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. Fluorescence minus-one (FMO) controls were used for gating as indicated in Supplementary Fig. S1. Cells were washed with 1 X PBS containing 1% cs-FCS then resuspended in 1 X Cell Fix solution (BD, USA) and analyzed using a LSRII flow cytometer (BD, USA) and FlowJo software version 10.1 (Treestar Inc., Ashland, Ore). Dead cells were excluded from the scatter plots prior to analysis and only single cellular populations were analyzed (Supplementary Fig. S1). Results were plotted as frequency (percentage of total), or expression as median fluorescence intensity (MFI) per number of double-positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chemokine Receptor Expression in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human NP and AF cells were cultured in monolayer and collected by scraping with a cell scraper. Cells were first incubated with human IgG (R&D Systems) to block non-specific binding sites and then incubated with conjugated Abs: Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated antibody specific for CCR1 (anti-CCR1-AF488, R&D Systems), allophycocyanin-conjugated antibody specific for CCR2 (anti-CCR2-APC; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), phycoerythrin-conjugated antibody specific for CCR5 (anti-CCR5-PE, BioLegend), or their isotype controls (5 μL each) in flow cytometry staining buffer (R&D Systems). Cells were washed three times in staining buffer, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde, and then analyzed using flow cytometry (CyAn ADPAnalyzer, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!