The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using labx xrd 6000

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallinity of the samples was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (Shimadzu LabX XRD-6000). Grazing-incidence XRD (GIXRD) measurements were performed with D8 Discover with GADDS (Bruker AXS Gmbh, Karisruhe, Germany). Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken with a FEI Tecnai Osiris system and top-view TEM images were taken with a FEI Tecnai F20 system. The morphologies of the prepared samples were obtained using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi, S-8010). X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) was performed by a Ulvac-PHI 1600 spectrometer with monochromatic Al Kα X-ray radiation (1486.6 eV). Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy were conducted with HORIBA LabRAM HR800 except for the Raman mapping. We used 632 nm excitation wavelength for the measurements. The Si peak at 520 cm−1 was used as a reference for wavenumber calibration. The Raman mapping was performed on Nanofinder 30 (Tokyo Instruments, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

XRD Analysis of Mg-TiN Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extruded pure magnesium and Mg-TiN nanocomposite samples were exposed to Cu Kα radiation of wavelength λ = 1.54056 Å with a scan speed of 2 °/min by using an automated Shimadzu lab-X XRD-6000 diffractometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The Bragg angles and the values of the interplanar spacing, d, obtained were subsequently matched with the standard values of Mg, TiN and related phases. Further, the basal plane orientation of Mg-TiN nanocomposites was analyzed based on the XRD peaks obtained from experiments carried out in the directions both parallel and perpendicular to the extrusion axis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured by a Shimadzu LabX XRD-6000 diffractometer with Cu kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses were performed on a Hitachi S-4800 microscope and an FEI-Tecnai G2 20 microscope, respectively. XPS measurements were conducted by using a VG ESCALAB 250 instrument with a monochromatized Al X-ray source (1486.6 eV). Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were obtained from a Quadrasorb instrument at 77 K. ICP-AES was detected by a Perinlmer Optima 2000DV instrument. The HAADF-STEM images were obtained on a JEOL ARM200CF fifth order aberration-corrected TEM equipped with a dual-type EDS detector. The X-ray absorption find structure spectra were measured at the BL8C beamline in Pohang Light Source (PLS), Korea.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD analysis was performed using SHIMADZU LabX XRD-6000 (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). Data were collected at a step size of 0.02° and a scan rate of 2 deg/min under the X-ray generated by Cu radiation (1.542 Å) at 40 kV, 30 mA, and a 2θ of 20°–85°. The four highest Bragg angles of the corresponding preferential orientations of crystal lattice planes were used to obtain and compare peak intensities. The FWHM of the diffraction peak was used for crystal quantification and grain size calculation.15
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Nanomaterial Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) measurements was carried out using a JEOL-2010F (200 kV) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The ultraviolet and visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were examined with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (TU-1901, Beijing, China). Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was performed using a Nicolet 5700 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The prepared nanomaterials were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, LabX XRD-6000 (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan)). Elemental analysis was recorded by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific Escalab 250Xi, USA). Fluorescence spectra were collected using an F-4700 fluorescence spectrophotometer (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Carbon Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A X-ray diffraction (XRD, Shimadzu labx XRD-6000) spectroscope was used to characterize crystalline structures of carbon composites. The XRD patterns of the synthesized GO and Ag NP- and ZnO NP-doped GO composites were recorded at a scan rate of 4 degree/min using monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation (MXP18; MAC Science Co., Tokyo, Japan) at 30 kV and 20 mA. The recorded specific peak intensity and 2θ values were further identified using a database system (JCPDS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Silver Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectral analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) of the formed GO and rGO/AgNC were done using UV/VIS/NIR Spectrophotometer (V-630, Japan) and FT/IR-4100typeA, respectively. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the GO and rGO/AgNC were recorded at 2θ values between 10° and 80° using a Cu X-ray tube at 40 kV and 30 mA with the X-ray diffractometer (model LabX XRD-6000, Shimadzu, Japan). The Zeta Potential analysis was carried out using Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS90, Malvern, UK. Transmission electron microscopic analysis (TEM) was done using JEOL JEM-2100, Japan, as described before (Eldeeb et al. 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of g-C3N4/TNA Membrane

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the g-C3N4/TNA membrane was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta 200 FEG) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F). The crystallinity of the sample was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (Shimadzu LabX XRD-6000). BET surface area and pore volume distribution were analyzed using an automated surface area and pore size analyzer (QuantachromeAutosorb-1 MP). The UV-vis absorption spectrum of the g-C3N4/TNA membrane was investigated using UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) (Shimadzu UV-2450). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) of the samples were obtained in KBr pellets on a Nicolet 5DXC IR spectrometer (Nicolet, Madison). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB250) was used to analyze the elemental composition of the g-C3N4/TNA membrane. The photoluminescence spectrum of the sample was measured at room temperature using a 380 nm excitation wavelength (F-4500). Membrane pore size distribution was measured by using a Porometer (Porolux 1000) under a room temperature of 25 °C. The water contact angle of the g-C3N4/TNA membranes was tested using a contact angle and surface tension measurement system (Physics Instruments Ltd., Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Uniaxial Compression Testing of Metallic Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 6 mm diameter cylinder specimens with a length-to-diameter ratio of 1, were prepared for room temperature uniaxial compression tests at a strain rate of 5 × 10−3 s−1, using an Instron 8874 universal testing machine. An extensometer was used to measure plastic deformation. Three specimens were tested for each material. The microstructures of three materials were observed using an Olympus optical microscope and a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out on specimens before compression and after yielding, using an automated Shimadzu Lab-X XRD-6000 diffractometer (Cu Kα, λ = 1.54056 Ǻ) operating at a scanning speed of 2 deg/min. The specimens were etched with a mixture of 1 g oxalic, 1 ml nitric acid, 1 ml acetic acid and 150 ml distilled water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zinc oxide nanoparticle (particle size >100 nm) powder was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The primary particle size was determined using scanning electron microscope (S-3400N, Scanning Electron Microscope; HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan), operated at an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. The X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) spectrum was obtained to confirm the chemical composition of ZnO NPs. The crystalline nature of the particles was assessed by X-ray diffractometer (Lab X, XRD-6000; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan), operated at a voltage of 40 kW and a current of 30 mA with CuK α radiation λ = 1.5406 in the scan range of 2Θ = 10–80° to obtain the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!