The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mastersizer x

Manufactured by Malvern Panalytical
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Mastersizer X is a laser diffraction particle size analyzer manufactured by Malvern Panalytical. It is designed to measure the particle size distribution of a wide range of materials, including powders, suspensions, and emulsions, by analyzing the pattern of light scattered by the particles when a laser beam is passed through the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using mastersizer x

1

Formulation and Characterization of MF59 Adjuvant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MF59 is Novartis proprietary oil-in-water emulsion consisting of 4.3% (vol/vol) squalene, 0.5% Tween 80, and 0.5% Span 85, in citrate buffer (10 mM). MF59 was prepared by homogenization at 12,000 psi with a Microfluidizer, model 110Y (Microfluidics). The emulsion was sterilized by passage through a polysulfone filter with 0.22 μm pore size (Gelman Sciences) and stored at 4°C. The mean particle size of the emulsion droplets determined with a Mastersizer X (Malvern Instruments) was 194±76 nm. Fluorescently labelled-MF59 was prepared formulating chloroform dissolved DiO fluorescent lipophilic tracer (Molecular Probes; Invitrogen-Life Technologies) in the squalene phase of MF59. The complete evaporation of chloroform was performed before homogenization of the emulsion as described above. The final concentration of DiO was 0.25 μg/ml.
Formulation with MF59 or DiO fluorescently labeled MF59 was prepared diluting the emulsion ½ in the volume dose with physiologic solution. The volume of the immunization dose was 10 μl.
Formulation with ALUM was prepared diluting, ALUM (2 mg/ml) in a solution (prepared with Water For Injection) with 10 mM histidine buffer pH 6.5 and 136 mM NaCl. The volume of the immunization dose was 20 μl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Particle Size Analysis of Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size distribution of the microparticles was determined by laser diffraction method using Malvern Mastersizer X (UK) after the formulations had been dispersed in appropriate medium (saturated solution of SS in water) and sonicated for 2 min. The geometrical diameter was expressed as volume median diameter (D50%). Also the Span values of formulations were defined as D90%-D10%D50% , which represents the breadth of the particle distribution. Each measurement was repeated in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimized PWO-in-water Emulsion Design

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical design. PWO-in-water emulsion was performed according to a Box-Behnken experimental design (15 runs, 12 experimental points and three central points). SL content (2–6% of PWO), homogenization time (HT, 1–5 min) and homogenization speed (HS, 11,000–20,000 rpm) were the independent variables. Droplet size (D[4,3]), and lipid oxidation evaluated as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARs) were the dependent variables.
Experimental data were fit to a second-order regression model. All the experiments were conducted randomly to avoid systematic bias. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied at each independent variable and the multiple response optimization was performed using the desirability function, where droplet size and TBARs values were minimized.
Preparation and characterization of PWO emulsion. PWO-in-water emulsions (6 g) were prepared by dispersing SL (0.05–0.16 g) in distilled water (3.17–3.28 g) at 40 °C by stirring at 500 rpm for 20 min. The dispersion was added to PWO (2.67 g) and the mixture was homogenized with a Polytron PT-2100 (Kinematica AG, Luzern, Switzerland). Droplet size of PWO emulsions was determined by laser diffraction, using a particle size analyzer (Mastersizer X, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK), and expressed as D[4,3]. Lipid oxidation was evaluated by TBARs, according to [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Cement Particles: SEM and Laser Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three types of cement have been used, including CEM I 52.5N (Portland cement-PC), CEM II/B-V 32.5R (PC-FA), and CEM III/A 42.5N (PC-GGBS). CEM I, II and III have been supplied by Hanson Cements (Stamford, UK), Lafarge (Leics, UK) and Ecocem (Dublin, Ireland) respectively. The chemical and physical characteristics of cements as provided by the manufacturers are presented in Table 1.
The shapes and sizes of cements particles were characterised by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (EVO 50, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, German) image analysis and presented in Figure 3. The particle size distributions (PSD) of cements were determined by the Laser Diffractometry (Mastersizer X, Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK), and results are shown in Figure 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Particle Size Characterization by Laser Scattering

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle size and size distribution were determined by laser light scattering using Mastersizer X (Worcestershire, Malvern Instrument, Worcestershire, UK).
The powder was dispersed in recirculating propilenglycol, and the mean particle size was expressed as the volume mean diameter (D4,3). The polydispersity was given by the span index, which was calculated according to Equation (3) [41 (link)].
Span=D(0.9)D(0.1)D(0.5)
where D0.1, D0.5, and D0.9 correspond to the diameters relative to 10%, 50%, and 90% of the accumulated size distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Particle Size Measurement of MJ Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size of the MJ powders (SD, FDc and FDm) was measured using a MastersizerX (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). The samples were dispersed in isopropanol and sonicated for 20 s in enough powder to reach the optimal shade in the equipment. The mean particle size was expressed as the volume mean diameter (D4,3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Iodine Contrast Aerosol Particle Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aerosol particle size was measured by laser diffraction using a particle size analyzer (Mastersizer X, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). Eight independent measurements were performed in identical experimental conditions on the aerosolized iodine contrast-containing solution and the resulting median aerodynamic diameter (MAD) and geometric standard deviations were averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Particle Size Analysis of Radiopacifiers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle size distributions of BaSO4, anatase TiO2 and yttria-stabilised ZrO2 were examined using laser diffraction (Mastersizer X, Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire, UK) attached to an ultrasonic bath mixer. 1 g of the radiopacifier was added to 50 mL deionised distilled water in the ultrasonic bath mixer. This disperses the particles, preventing agglomerations in order to obtain accurate size readings. The suspension was measured using a 45 mm optical lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Emulsion Droplet Diameter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two techniques were used to measure the MEDD of the self-emulsified systems (with appropriate dilution). Low angle laser light diffraction (Malvern Mastersizer X) with small volume cell using 45 mm lens was used for emulsions with droplet distributions above 1 μm. Quasi-elastic light scattering (QELS, Malvern model LO-C photon correlation spectrometer) was used to analyze samples of submicron dispersions. For both techniques experiments were performed in triplicate and the size distributions of the resultant emulsions were obtained using the volume-average diameters of the 50 percentiles, D (v, 0.5). MEDD values are expressed as mean values of all data ± standard error.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Citral Microparticle Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Moisture content was analysed according to method n° 925.10 (AOAC, 1997 ). Water activity (aw) was determined by the dew point method using a HigroLab (Rotronic, USA) at 20 ± 0.3 °C and hygroscopicity (Hg) was evaluated according to the procedure described by Cai and Corke (2000) .
The outer structure of the citral microparticles was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The citral microparticles were coated with gold/palladium, using a PS 10E vacuum evaporator and analysed using a LEO 1420VP SEM (LEO Electron Microscopy Ltd., Cambridge, UK) operated at 20 kV. The scanned images were collected digitally using the EDS 7424 software (Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK).
Particle size and size distribution were determined by light scattering using a laser diffraction particle size analyser (Mastersizer X, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Citral microparticles were dispersed in water and the results were expressed as volume average (D4,3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!