The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Murex hiv 1.2 o hiv enzyme immunoassay

Manufactured by DiaSorin
Sourced in Italy

The Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay is a lab equipment product designed for the detection of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human serum or plasma samples. It is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that utilizes recombinant antigens to detect the presence of HIV-specific antibodies.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using murex hiv 1.2 o hiv enzyme immunoassay

1

HIV Testing Algorithm Validation in KAIS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the central laboratory, the same validated HIV testing algorithm that was used in KAIS 2007 was applied to KAIS 2012 blood samples. All specimens were initially screened with Vironostika HIV-1/2 UNIF II Plus O Enzyme Linked Immunoassay (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Specimens that were reactive were then tested with the Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay (DiaSorin, SpA, Saluggia, Italy) to confirm reactivity. Specimens with discrepant results were retested using the same algorithm. Twice discrepant results were resolved using polymerase chain reaction (Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, version 1.5, Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA). HIV-positive dried blood spot specimens were tested for HIV RNA concentration using the Abbott M2000 Real-Time HIV-1 Assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and recent HIV infection using the Limiting Antigen Avidity Enzyme Immunoassay (LAg-Avidity EIA) (Maxim Biomedical, Inc., Rockville, MD). Specimens with a normalized optical density value of 1.5 or lower on the LAg-Avidity EIA and (1) not virally suppressed (defined as HIV RNA concentration <1000 copies/mL) or (2) did not report use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for their HIV infection were classified as indicative of recent infection. The estimated mean duration of recent infection for the assay was 130 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 118 to 142).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HIV Diagnostic Testing Algorithm Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biologic testing was performed at the National HIV Reference Laboratory. HIV testing was done using Kenya’s validated testing algorithm, which included screening with Vironostika HIV-1/2 UNIF II Plus O Enzyme Immunoassay (bioMérieux, Marcy d’Etoile, France). Positive samples were confirmed with the Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay (DiaSorin, SpA, Saluggia, Italy). Discordant results were retested with the 2 assays. Twice discordant results, if they occurred, were tested using a polymerase chain reaction assay (Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, version 1.5; Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA). For quality control, all positive specimens and 5% of negative specimens were retested using the same testing algorithm at the Kenya Medical Research Institute laboratory. For persons with positive HIV tests, measurements of CD4 cell counts (BD FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer; Becton Dickinson Biosciences, San Jose, CA) were performed centrally as well as measurement of HIV viral load (Abbott M2000 Real-Time HIV-1 Assay; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dried Blood Spot HIV Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We asked parents or guardians of eligible children for their verbal consent to collect a blood sample for biologic testing and extended storage for future unspecified testing at the National HIV Reference Laboratory (NHRL) in Nairobi. At NHRL dried blood spot specimens were tested for HIV antibody using the Vironostika HIV-1/2 UNIF II plus O Enzyme Immunoassay (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and confirmed using the Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay (DiaSorin SpA, Saluggia, Italy). Repeat testing was done for discordant results, and, if results remained discordant, a final determination was made using polymerase chain reaction for HIV antigen (Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, version 1.5; Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA). We tested all confirmed HIV-positive blood specimens for HIV RNA concentration (Abbott M2000 Real-Time HIV-1 Assay; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). Test results from the NHRL were not returned to study participants. Home-based HIV testing and counseling, using rapid tests according to the national HIV testing algorithm, was offered to all persons participating in the survey, including parents and guardians of participating children.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HIV Household Prevalence Survey

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were interviewed face-to-face regarding household and demographic characteristics, HIV testing history, and use of HIV-related care for persons known to be HIV infected. Information was collected on tablet computers (Mirus Innovations, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and transmitted electronically to a central database in Nairobi. Blood was obtained and tested at the National HIV Reference Laboratory for HIV antibodies using the Vironostika HIV-1/2 UNIF II Plus O Enzyme Immunoassay (bioMérieux, Marcy d’Etoile, France) as the screening assay and the Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay (DiaSorin, SpA, Sal-uggia, Italy) as the confirmatory assay. HIV-positive specimens were further tested for CD4 cell count using the BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson BioSciences, San Jose, CA). Due to hemolysis, 54.0% of HIV-positive specimens were not available for CD4 cell count testing at the National HIV Reference Laboratory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

KAIS HIV Surveillance Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire regarding household and demographic characteristics, biobehavioral factors, and use of HIV-related services such as HTS and voluntary medical male circumcision. Use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) for data collection in KAIS has been described elsewhere.23 (link) Data were collected on tablet computers (Mirus Innovations, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and securely transmitted electronically to a central database in Nairobi. Blood was obtained and tested for HIV antibodies at the National HIV Reference Laboratory (NHRL) using the Vironostika HIV-1/2 UNIF II Plus O Enzyme Immunoassay (bioMérieux, Marcy d'Etoile, France) as the screening assay and the Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay (DiaSorin, SpA, Saluggia, Italy) as the confirmatory assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HIV Antibody Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were requested to provide a blood specimen for HIV testing at the National HIV Reference Laboratory in Nairobi. Specimens were tested for HIV antibody using the Vironostika HIV-1/2 UNIF II Plus O Enzyme Immunoassay (bioMérieux, Marcy d’Etoile, France), and positive results were confirmed using the Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay (DiaSorin, SpA, Saluggia, Italy). Repeat testing was performed for discordant results using the same algorithm, and if results remained discordant, final results were obtained using polymerase chain reaction (Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, version 1.5, Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Home-based HIV Testing and Counseling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As a service to study participants, respondents were given the opportunity to learn their HIV status within their homes through home-based testing and counseling using venous blood samples collected for the survey or a separate capillary sample. Methods for home-based testing and counseling were consistent with national guidelines for HIV testing.14 All specimens for centralized testing were transported from the field to the National HIV Reference Laboratory, where HIV tests were performed. Specimens were screened with Vironostika HIV-1/2 UNIF II Plus O Enzyme Immunoassay (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Specimens testing negative by the screening assay were reported as a final result negative. Specimens testing positive by the screening assay were confirmed using the Murex HIV.1.2.O HIV Enzyme Immunoassay (DiaSorin SpA, Saluggia, Italy). Samples showing discordant results after confirmatory testing were tested again with the 2 assays. Polymerase chain reaction (Cobas AmplicorHIV-1 Monitor Test, version 1.5; Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA) was performed to resolve specimens with twice-discordant results. All positive specimens and 5% of negative specimens were retested for quality assurance purposes using the same testing algorithm at the Kenya Medical Research Institute Laboratory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!