The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using purelink micro to midi kit

1

Quantitative Analysis of Aquaporin-1 and GAP-43 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
L4-6 DRGs (in control and sciatic nerve crush studies) were collected after euthanasia, total RNA was isolated by a PureLinkTM Micro-to-midi kit (Invitrogen), and cDNA was reverse-transcribed from mRNA with the Super-Script First Strand Synthesis System for reverse transcription-PCR (Invitrogen). Fluorescence-based quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR was carried out using the LightCycler 480 and with LightCycler FastStart DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green I kit (Roche Diagnostics). Primers were as follows: 5′-TGTATGCCTCTGGTCGTACC-3′ (sense) and 5′-CAGGTCCAGACGCAGGATG-3′ (antisense) for GAPDH; 5′-CTCAACTACATGGTCTACATGTTCCA-3′ (sense) and 5′- CCATTTCGGCCTTGACTGT-3′ (antisense) for AQP1, 5′-CAGGAAAGATCCCAAGTCCA-3′ (sense) and 5′-GAACGGAACATTGCACACAC-3′ (antisense) for GAP-43. Data were analyzed by LightCycler software 4.0 (Roche Diagnostics) and reported as calibrated ratios normalized to GAPDH. Data were averaged from six mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microarray Analysis of PKC Isoforms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression studies were performed as described [33 (link)]. Briefly, RNA was extracted and purified with the PureLinkTM Micro-to-Midi kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). cDNA and biotinylated cRNA were synthesized using a T7-polyT primer and the BioArray RNA labeling kit (Enzo, NY, USA), respectively. Labeled RNA was hybridized to Human Gene 1.0 ST oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix, CA, USA). For the microarray data analysis, the .CEL files (in triplicate) were imported into the dChip software 19, and expression levels of the different PKC isoforms analysed. Levels of expression (arbitrary units) of the different PKC isoforms were plotted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extracting RNA from Sciatic Nerves and Schwann Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To extract total RNA from sciatic nerves and cultured rat Schwann cells, we used the Purelink Micro-To-Midi kit and followed the instructions of the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Genomic DNA was removed by incubation with RNase free DNase I (Fermentas), and RNA was primed with random hexamers and retrotranscribed to cDNA with Super Script II Reverse transcription (Invitrogen). Control reactions were performed omitting retrotranscriptase. qPCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR System and 5× PyroTaq EvaGreen qPCR Mix Plus (CMB). To avoid genomic amplification, PCR primers were designed to fall into separate exons flanking a large intron when possible. Reactions were performed in duplicates of three different dilutions, and threshold cycle values were normalized to the housekeeping gene 18S. The specificity of the products was determined by melting curve analysis and gel electrophoresis. The ratio of the relative expression for each gene to 18S was calculated by using the 2ΔCT formula. Amplicons were of similar size (≈100 bp) and melting points (≈85°C). Similar amplification efficiency for each product was confirmed by using duplicates of three dilutions for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR for CPEB3 mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neurons were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and scraped in TRIzol (Invitrogen) and RNA was extracted by means of the Purelink micro to midi kit (Invitrogen) or by phenol chloroform isolation. RNA concentration was measured by means of a Nanodrop (Nanodrop Technologies). Aliquots of RNA (1 μg) were reverse-transcribed to cDNA with SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) using olido d(T) primers. Real-time qPCR was performed as described (Noh et al., 2012 (link); Rodenas-Ruano et al., 2012 (link)) with TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems) for CPEB3 (reference number: Mm01204299_m1) and normalized to GAPDH (reference number: Mm99999915_g1). Reactions were performed in triplicate in a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The relative change in mRNA expression was determined by the equation: Fold change = 2− ΔCt (ΔCt = Ct target – Ct reference) where Ct refers to cycle number at which the fluorescence signal crosses a threshold (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). Relative expression ratio in Fmr1 KO neurons was calculated by normalization to WT type levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative RT-PCR for CPEB3 mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neurons were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and scraped in TRIzol (Invitrogen) and RNA was extracted by means of the Purelink micro to midi kit (Invitrogen) or by phenol chloroform isolation. RNA concentration was measured by means of a Nanodrop (Nanodrop Technologies). Aliquots of RNA (1 μg) were reverse-transcribed to cDNA with SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) using olido d(T) primers. Real-time qPCR was performed as described (Noh et al., 2012 (link); Rodenas-Ruano et al., 2012 (link)) with TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems) for CPEB3 (reference number: Mm01204299_m1) and normalized to GAPDH (reference number: Mm99999915_g1). Reactions were performed in triplicate in a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The relative change in mRNA expression was determined by the equation: Fold change = 2− ΔCt (ΔCt = Ct target – Ct reference) where Ct refers to cycle number at which the fluorescence signal crosses a threshold (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). Relative expression ratio in Fmr1 KO neurons was calculated by normalization to WT type levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!