The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using cd24 percpcy5

1

Comprehensive Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used: APC labeled PBS57 loaded CD1d-tetramers from the NIH tetramer facility, TCRβ APC-e780 (H57-597, eBiosciences) or Pacific Blue (H57-597, Biolegend), CD44 AlexaFluor(AF)700 (IM7, Biolegend), CD45.2 Pacific Blue (104, Biolegend), Thy1.1 phycoerythrin (PE) (A85-1, BD Pharmingen), Thy1.2 FITC (53-2.1, BD Pharmingen), NK1.1 PE-Cy7 or PE (PK136, BD Pharmingen), or Pacific Blue (PK136, Biolegend), or NK1.1-biotin (PK136, eBiosciences) followed by streptavidin-PE Texas Red, CD24 PerCPCy5.5 (M1/69, eBiosciences) or FITC or PE (M1/69, BD Pharmingen), IL-17A PE (17B7, eBiosciences), IL-4 PE-Cy7 (BVD6-24G2, eBiosciences), IFN-γ PerCPCy5.5 (XMG1.2, Biolegend), cMyc (Y69, abcam) or p27kip1 (D69C12; Cell Signaling Technology) followed by anti-rabbit IgG PE (Life Sciences), Ki67-PeCy7 (B56, BD Pharmingen), rabbit IgG isotype (Life Technologies) and BrdU (BrdU flow kit; BD Pharmingen). For transcription factor staining, cells were incubated with antibody to PLZF (D-9, Santa Cruz), followed by anti-mouse IgG1 PE (A85-1, eBiosciences), and then T-bet PE-Cy7 (4B10, eBiosciences), GATA3 PerCpCy5.5 (TWAJ, eBiosciences), and RORγt-BV421 (Q31-378, BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Characterization of Dermal Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dermal fibroblasts were isolated as previously described (Jensen et al., 2010 (link); Collins et al., 2011 (link); Rognoni et al., 2018 (link)). The muscle and fat from dissected neonatal or adult back skin were scrapped off from the underside of the skin using a scalpel and the tissue was incubated overnight at 4∘C in a Dispase (Sigma) only solution. The epidermis was then carefully peeled off and discarded, leaving the intact dermis. The dermis was minced using a scalpel and enzymatically dissociated with a mixture of 1.25 mg/ml collagenase type 1 (Invitrogen), 0.5 mg/ml collagenase type 2 Worthington), 0.5 mg/ml collagenase type 1V (Sigma), 0.1 mg/ml hyaluronidase IVS (Sigma) and 50 U/ml DNase 1 for approximately 45 min at 37∘C. Dermal cell suspensions were passed through a 70 μm cell strainer and washed three times with PBS before being labeled with the following antibodies: Cd24 PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, Clone M1/69), Cd26 PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, Clone M194-112), Ly-6A/E APC (eBioscience, Clone D7), Cd140b APC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 17-1402-82), Pref-1/Dlk1 APC (R&D Systems, FAB8634A), Lrig1 Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated (R&D Systems, FAB3688G). DAPI was used to exclude dead cells. FACS analysis was carried out with BD FACSCanto 1 or 11. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software version 10.5.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of tumor cell subpopulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary Apc; Pten; Trp53 tumors were mechanically dissected into single cell suspension as previously described (5 (link)). Cells from primary tumor suspensions or the W2476T cell lines were then isolated using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). Briefly, primary ovarian tumor or W2476T cell line single cell suspensions were counted and incubated with primary antibodies CD24-PerCP Cy5.5, CD117-APC and CD133-PE (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD44-Pacific Blue (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), CD90-PE (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) for 30 min at 4° C. Cells were then stained with propidium iodide (PI) or DAPI as a viability stain. For ALDH+ samples, ALDH enzymatic activity was defined using the ALDEFLUOR kit (Stem Cell Technologies, Canada) as previously described (5 (link)). FACS was performed with ~ 1 ×106 cells using FACSAria (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) under low pressure in the absence of UV light. Live cells were selected based upon both forward vs. side-scatter profiles and absence of PI or DAPI stain and ALDEFLUOR/DEAB treated cells were used to define negative gates for ALDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!