The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1 232 protocols using fortessa

1

Directed Differentiation of Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For live‐cell luminescence microscopy, cells were cultured in N2B27+2iLIF for at least two passages before 30,000 cells were seeded on E‐Cadherin in fluorodishes (WPI, Cat#FD35‐100) and incubated in N2B27+2iLIF overnight. The next day, the medium was changed to N2B27 supplemented with 1 mM luciferin and 0.5 μl of RealTime Glo Cell Viability Assay Substrate, and image acquisition was started.
For differentiation assays after cell sorting, cells were seeded at a density of 60,000 cells/well of a 6‐well plate coated with gelatin. Two days later, the medium was exchanged for fresh N2B27 and after 4 days differentiation outcomes were assessed by flow cytometry on a BD Fortessa.
To direct differentiation towards the mesendoderm, cells were seeded at a density of 60,000 cells/well of a gelatin‐coated 12‐well plate in N2B27 medium supplemented with 3 μM of CHIR99021. Three days later, differentiation outcomes were assessed by flow cytometry on a BD Fortessa. To direct differentiation towards the neuroectoderm, cells were seeded at a density of 60,000 cells/well of a gelatin‐coated 6‐well plate or 30,000 cells/well of a gelatin‐coated 12‐well plate in N2B27 medium supplemented with 1 μM SB‐431542 and 25 ng/ml of bFGF. Four days later, differentiation outcomes were assessed by flow cytometry on a BD Fortessa.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Cyto-Chex Stabilized Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Directly upon arrival from Guinea-Bissau all whole blood samples, collected in Cyto-Chex BCT tubes (Streck), were processed and analyzed on a BD Fortessa instrument (BD Biosciences) as previously described (22 (link)). Likewise, it was confirmed that the expression patterns of markers were equivalent between Cyto-Chex-stabilized blood and fresh blood samples (data not shown). In brief, the blood samples were incubated in Lysis buffer (BD Biosciences) at a ratio of 1:6 for 5 min before centrifugation and washing in PBS/FCS (2%). After treatment with DNase (6 U/ml), the cells were extracellularly stained in PBS/EDTA (2mM) for 10 min at 37°C and further 20 min at room temperature. Permeabilization was performed with the FoxP3 kit (eBiosciences) prior to 60 min intracellular staining. Antibodies used for staining of extracellular (2B4, CCR7, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CD19, CD38, CD45RO, CD226, CXCR5, HLA-DR, PD-1 and TIGIT) and intracellular (Eomes) antigens, clones, fluorophores and suppliers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The cells were resuspended in Cytofix Buffer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed on a BD Fortessa.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Cultured TIL Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cultured TIL phenotypes after culture were characterized using flow cytometry with anti-CD3 (Cat#: 555339, 1.5 μL/106 cells), anti-CD4 (Cat#: 557871, 2 μL/106 cells), anti-CD8 (Cat#: 563823, 2 μL/106 cells), anti-CD56 (Cat#: 56275, 3 μL/106 cells), and anti-PD1 (Cat#: 561272, 5 μL/106 cells) for 30 minutes on ice in the dark [35 (link), 37 (link)]. Thereafter, the cells were washed once with PBS and resuspended in 400 μL PBS. 7AAD was used to distinguish live cells and dead cells, and the cells were run on a BD Fortessa (BD Biosciences). Fluorescence minus one (FMO) was used as the negative control. Moreover, FlowJo software was used to analyze the data generated by flow cytometry. FoxP3 staining was conducted using an intracellular staining protocol from BD Biosciences as follows: anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 were stained for 30 minutes on ice in the dark; TILs were washed, fixed, and permeabilized following protocols for BD Fix Buffer I (Cat#: 557870, BD Biosciences, USA) and Perm Buffer III (Cat#: 558050, BD Biosciences, USA). The cells were washed thrice with Perm Buffer III and incubated with anti-FoxP3 (Cat#: 560460, 5 μL/106 cells) for 30 minutes on ice in the dark. The cells were run on a BD Fortessa (BD Biosciences). Fluorescence minus one (FMO) was used as the negative control. FlowJo software was used to analyze the data generated by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Intracellular PHGDH Staining in MOLM13 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To perform PHGDH intracellular staining, MOLM13 cells transduced with shRNA targeting PHGDH or Renilla (control) were fixed with 1.6% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min at room temperature, then centrifuged (@1500 rpm for 4 min) and resuspended in 90% methanol for permeabilization and incubated overnight. The following day the methanol was removed, and the cells were stained with the primary rabbit polyclonal anti-human PHGDH antibody (dilution 1:50) followed by Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (dilution 1:200) and analyzed on the BD Fortessa instrument. For the ex vivo analysis of intracellular PHGDH, bone marrow cells were collected at the time of sacrifice and stained with anti-human CD45 antibody (CD45-PerCP/Cy5.5, dilution 1:100) and anti-mouse CD45 (APC or V540, dilution 1:200), then fixed and permeabilized as described above. Human CD45 staining was repeated after permeabilization together with PHGDH staining, followed by secondary. The data were analyzed on the BD Fortessa instrument. For the survival experiment, bone marrow cells were collected at the time of death, frozen and analyzed all together at the final endpoint, as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For 7AAD-cell cycle analysis, cell lines were plated at 1.5×106 cells per 10cm plate and treated with drug for 4 days. Cells were then dissociated, fixed with 100% ice cold Ethanol for at least 2 hours, incubated for 30 minutes with 1mg/mL DNase-free RNase A (Thermo) and resuspended in 20μg/mL 7-Aminoactinomycin D (7AAD; Invitrogen). 30,000 events were collected on the BD Fortessa and analyzed with the ModFit LT software and results were averaged for 3 or 4 biological replicates (n indicated in legend).
For Annexin V/7AAD apoptosis analysis, cell lines were plated at 5×104 cells per well of 6 well plate and treated with drug for 3 days. Supernatant was retained and added to trypsinized suspensions of adherent cells. Cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC (BD Biosciences) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and resuspended with 1μg/mL 7AAD prior to analysis on BD Fortessa. For sensitized lines 2μM GSK126 pretreated for 9 days and continued for 3 days with etoposide was used, while for protected line 10μM GSK126 treated for 3 days with etoposide was used. Data was analyzed with FlowJo (Treestar) software and percentage Annexin V+/7AAD cells were averaged for 4 biological replicate experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Rex1-reporter flow cytometry analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were dissociated in 0.25% trypsin/EDTA, and trypsin was neutralised with DMEM supplemented with 15% FCS. After passing through a 40 µm mesh, Rex1‐reporter activity was measured using a BD Fortessa machine. High‐throughput measurements were performed in 96‐well plates using the HTS unit of the BD Fortessa. Data were analysed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Parasite Growth and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For growth assays, parasitemia was determined using flow cytometry-based detection of Hoechst-stained DNA within RBCs. At the given time points, samples of the parasite culture were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)-0.02% glutaraldehyde for 1 h at room temperature. These samples were then stained with 4 µg/ml Hoechst solution for 30 min and analyzed on a BD Fortessa instrument. Erythrocytes were gated based on their forward and side scatter parameters, and Hoechst stain-positive RBCs were identified using the 450/50-UVA detector. For invasion assays, Percoll-purified schizonts were incubated with RBCs (~5% parasitemia) and incubated at 37°C in shaking cultures. Samples were fixed with 4% PFA-0.02% glutaraldehyde after 0, 2, and 24 h and stained with Sybr green I (Life Technologies) prior to analysis on a BD Fortessa instrument, using the 530/30-blue detector configuration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extracellular Mitochondria Analysis in Astrocyte-Conditioned Medium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard FACS analysis was performed by BD Fortessa. Extracellular mitochondria were identified by mitochondrial protein E1 alpha pyruvate dehydrogenase-GFP or Mitotracker Deep Red. Astrocyte-conditioned medium (ACM) was collected from rat cortical astrocytes. Briefly, ACM were centrifuged by 700g for 5 minutes in order to exclude cellular debris. It is important to note that astrocytic viability was not affected by various stimuli in this study. Therefore, passively released mitochondria from dying/dead cells during ACM collection should not impact on changes in the number of actively secreted extracellular mitochondria. When ACM were collected from astrocytes labeled by mitochondria GFP, samples were directly analyzed by BD Fortessa following the centrifugation. Other than that, ACM were incubated with Mitotracker Deep Red (50 nM) for 30 min at 37°C. For FACS analysis, control beads were utilized to gate population ranging in size less than 900 nm as previously reported [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Proliferation and Lipoprotein Uptake Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the cell proliferation assays, the cells were trypsinized carefully using 0.25%Trypsin-EDTA, centrifuged at 1200 RPM for 5mins and the pellet was resuspended in 200μl of fresh complete medium at each time point. The cells were analyzed by BD Fortessa (BD Biosciences) to obtain the cell counts. For the lipoprotein uptake studies, macrophages were incubated with nLDL and oxLDL at 37°C. At each time point, the cells were trypsinized, pelleted and resuspended in fresh medium before analyzing them by flow cytometry (BD Fortessa). The data was analyzed using FlowJo software v.10. The populations were gated to omit dead and apoptotic cells and live population cell counts, median forward scatter and medium front scatter data was obtained. All experiments were conducted at least 3 times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For 7AAD-cell cycle analysis, cell lines were plated at 1.5×106 cells per 10cm plate and treated with drug for 4 days. Cells were then dissociated, fixed with 100% ice cold Ethanol for at least 2 hours, incubated for 30 minutes with 1mg/mL DNase-free RNase A (Thermo) and resuspended in 20μg/mL 7-Aminoactinomycin D (7AAD; Invitrogen). 30,000 events were collected on the BD Fortessa and analyzed with the ModFit LT software and results were averaged for 3 or 4 biological replicates (n indicated in legend).
For Annexin V/7AAD apoptosis analysis, cell lines were plated at 5×104 cells per well of 6 well plate and treated with drug for 3 days. Supernatant was retained and added to trypsinized suspensions of adherent cells. Cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC (BD Biosciences) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and resuspended with 1μg/mL 7AAD prior to analysis on BD Fortessa. For sensitized lines 2μM GSK126 pretreated for 9 days and continued for 3 days with etoposide was used, while for protected line 10μM GSK126 treated for 3 days with etoposide was used. Data was analyzed with FlowJo (Treestar) software and percentage Annexin V+/7AAD cells were averaged for 4 biological replicate experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!