The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Luna universal qpcr master mix

Manufactured by New England Biolabs
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan, China, Switzerland, Canada, Singapore, India

Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix is a pre-mixed solution designed for real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments. It contains all the necessary components, including DNA polymerase, dNTPs, and buffers, to perform efficient and reliable qPCR reactions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

641 protocols using luna universal qpcr master mix

1

Quantifying Gene Expression in Tomato Using qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qRT–PCR used the Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB, USA) in a 10 μl total sample volume [5 μl of 2× Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix, 1.0 μl of primers (10 µM), 1.0 μl of cDNA (200 ng µl–1), and 3 μl of distilled, deionized water]. We calculated relative gene expression values using the 2−ΔΔCt method with tomato Tubulin gene (Solyc04g081490.3.1, ITAG4.0) and SKP1 gene (S-phase kinase-related protein 1; Solyc01g111650.3.1, ITAG4.0) as internal reference genes. There were independent samplings of at least two biological replicates and three technical replicates were included for each treatment. Primers used in the qRT–PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Transcriptional Termination Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SMRT-Cappable-seq enrichment: The first strand cDNAs were used as templates to determine the enrichment of primary transcript. The level of rRNA and mRNA was examined using qPCR (Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix, New England Biolabs) with primers targeting E. coli rrlH, rrlA, hupB, rmf genes, and the Gluc gene (Supplementary Table 1).
Deletion strains: To examine the degree of read-through across the dapA-bamC termination site, the cDNA was synthesized from RNA of wild type and deletion strain using ProtoScript II Reverse Transcriptase (New England Biolabs) with random primers following the manustructure’s instructions. The degree of read-through was measured by comparing the expression level of RNA upstream of TTS (qPCR1) with the level downstream of TTS (qPCR2) (Supplementary Fig. 7b) using qPCR (Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix, New England Biolabs).
All the qPCR primer sequences are listed in the Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Gene Dosage Using qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene dosage of different samples was performed with relative quantification real-time PCR method. Real-time PCR reaction was performed using Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB) and RPPH1 (a reference gene with a single copy) primers used for quantitative analysis were referred to Ahani's study [8 (link)]. Additionally, primers were designed for specific detection of CYP1B1 (exons 1 and 2), CYP2E1 (exons 8 and 9) and CYP2C9 (exons 4 and 7) (Table 1). The reaction was performed in 96 wells plate with 10 μL volume in total, which included 10 ng genomic DNA, 1X Luna Universal qPCR Mastermix (NEB), 0.25 μL for each primer (10 pmole/μL) and Ultrapure Distilled Water (ThermoFisher Scientific). Subsequently, the covered plates were run on LightCycler 96 Instrument (Roche) with the thermocycle with denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, following by 45 cycles (95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s). The copy number of targeted exon in comparison to reference gene was determined according to the following equation: ΔΔCt = [CtRPPH1(Reference sample) − Ct targeted exon (reference sample)] − [CtRPPH1(Unknown sample) − Ct targeted exon (Unknown sample)]. The relative copy number of the genes was later calculated following the ratio equation (2−ΔΔCt).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating RNA-seq Findings via qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the differential gene expression identified from RNA-seq data, six candidate genes were selected to be performed with quantitative reverse transcription PCR, including cfap206, rnf8, naa38, saxo2, tdo2b, and tlr5. The gapdh gene was used as a reference. The reverse transcription was conducted using LunaScript® RT SuperMix Kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) with 400 ng input of total RNA, following the manufacturer’s procedure. The Oligo 7.0 software (Molecular Biology Insights Inc., Cascade, CO, USA) was used to design qPCR primers for these genes (Table S3). The primers were synthesized by Eurofins (Eurofins Genomics LLC., Louisville, KY, USA), and the target size of PCR products and amplification efficiency were evaluated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The Bio-Rad C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler with CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection Systems (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was employed to perform qRT-PCR experiments. The PCR reaction was conducted in a 20 µL mixture consisting of 8 µL of nuclease-free water, 0.5 µL of each primer (10 µmol/L), 1 µL of cDNA template, and 10 µL of Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix, using Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). All qRT-PCR assays were conducted by incubation in 96-well plates, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s with two technical replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Stool Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each stool sample was tested for SARS-CoV-2 presence using both a probe-based and dye-based qPCR. The probe-based qPCR was performed using the Luna Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Cat. No. M3004L) and the CDC primers. Each reaction consisted of a total volume of 20 μl with 1.5 μl of 6.7 μM primer/probe mix, 4 μl of cDNA, 4.5 μl of water, and 10 μl of Luna Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix. The qPCR was carried out following manufacturer recommendations on a Viia7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermofisher). The dye-based qPCR was performed using the Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Cat. No. M3003L) and the remaining primers: nsp14, 16S, HPRT, β-actin, GAPDH. Each reaction consisted of a total volume of 20 μl with 1 μl of 10 μM of forward and reverse primers, 4 μl of cDNA, 5 μl of water, and 10 μl of Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB). The qPCR was carried out following manufacturer recommendation on a Viia7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermofisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SARS-CoV-2 detection in stool samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each stool sample was tested for SARS-CoV-2 presence using both a probe-based and dye-based qPCR. The probe-based qPCR was performed using the Luna Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Cat. No. M3004L) and the CDC primers. Each reaction consisted of a total volume of 20 μl with 1.5 μl of 6.7 μM primer/probe mix, 4 μl of cDNA, 4.5 μl of water, and 10 μl of Luna Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix. The qPCR was carried out following manufacturer recommendations on a Viia7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermofisher). The dye-based qPCR was performed using the Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Cat. No. M3003L) and the remaining primers: nsp14, 16S, HPRT, β-actin, GAPDH. Each reaction consisted of a total volume of 20 μl with 1 μl of 10 μM of forward and reverse primers, 4 μl of cDNA, 5 μl of water, and 10 μl of Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB). The qPCR was carried out following manufacturer recommendation on a Viia7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermofisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Left auricles in Protocol 2 were stored in an RNAlater™ Stabilization Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at − 30 °C until analysis. Total RNA was extracted from the left auricles using a Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit (New England BioLabs, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, the RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a LunaScript RT SuperMix Kit (New England BioLabs). Next, following the manufacturer’s guidelines, quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs). Two microliter of cDNA (40 ng) was amplified with 500 nM each of the specific primer combinations for the target genes and 10 μL Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs) in a total volume of 20 μL. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation of 95 °C for 60 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. Then, real-time PCR was conducted for each sample according to a relative standard curve method, using a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Standard curves were obtained from serially diluted sample mixtures, after which the expression levels of samples were measured using these standard curves. Primers for the respective target genes (listed in Supplementary Table S2 online) were designed to anneal at 60 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Validated RT-qPCR Primer Sequences for Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forward and reverse primer pairs for SYBR-Green-based RT-qPCR analysis were designed in-house and validated under stringent conditions (efficiency between 90–110% and R2 > 0.99), as described previously [55 (link),69 (link),70 (link),71 (link)]. Table 1 lists the validated RT-qPCR primer sequences utilized in this study. RT-qPCR reactions were performed using the QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (ThermoScientific) in 96-well plates. The RT-qPCR reaction mix was completed in 15 μL reaction volume consisting of 5 ng cDNA, 600 nm forward and reverse primers, and 7.5 μL 2× Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB, M3003). The RT-qPCR cycling parameters consisted of 95 °C for one min followed by a two-step denaturation and extension cycle of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s for a total of 40 cycles. Plate reading was performed at the end of the extension phase. A DNA melt curve was performed at the completion of each RT-qPCR experiment to assess the amplification specificity. The RT-qPCR data was analyzed using the 2−∆∆Ct analysis method, as described previously [72 (link),73 (link)]. All samples were normalized to two independent housekeeping genes (RSP18 and RPL4). The relative mRNA expression of each gene was reported as the mRNA fold change ± standard error of means (SEM) relative to the CGL1dCas9 control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of CCND1 Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from Ewing sarcoma cells using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Thermos Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After DNase digestion, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed by Reverse Transcriptase M-MLV (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR reactions were run in triplicate on a QuantStudio1 Real Time qPCR instrument (Thermos Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For all experiments, no-RT controls were performed. PCR amplification was carried out with 1 μL of the 1:10 diluted reverse transcription sample with 10 μL of 2× Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs -NEB) and 4 pmol of specific gene primer pairs in a 20-μL total volume in 96-well microtiter plates.
Primers: (pncCCND1_B Fw: 5′-TGAGATTCTTGGCCGTCTGT-3′; pncCCND1_B Rev 5′-CCATATCCAAGCCGGCAGA-3′; CCND1-Fw 5′-GTGCAAGGCCTGAACCTG-3′; CCND1-Rev 5′-CGGGTCACACTGATCACTC-3′; GAPDH Fw: 5′-TGGTCACCAGGGCTGCTT-3′; GAPDH Rev 5′-CATGTAGTTGAGGTCAATGAAGG-3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Real-time PCR for Treg Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed for microarray data validation. Four key Treg transcripts were selected: FOXP3 (Hs.PT.58.3671186), IL2RA (Hs.PT.58.2187899), CTLA4 (Hs.PT.58.3907580) and IKZF2 (Hs.PT.58.2960172) (Integrated DNA Technologies Inc.). GAPDH (Hs.PT.39a.22214836) was used as a reference gene as, from microarray data, its expression was stable across all time points, with no variations amongst patient groups. All the 2MIU-IL-2 and placebo patient samples from the four time points were screened. Three technical replicates were completed for each condition.
200 ng of total RNA were retrotranscribed to cDNA using 5× qScriptTM DNA Supermix (Quantobio) by incubating samples at 25°C for 5 min, at 42°C for 30 min and at 85°C for 5 min. Subsequently, cDNA was mixed with 20× predesigned PrimeTime® qPCR Assay (Integrated DNA Technologies Inc.) and 2× Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs® Inc.). The mixture was incubated at 95°C for 3 min and 40 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s were performed using C1000 TouchTM Thermal cycler (Bio-Rad). Raw Ct values were retrieved using CFX MaestroTM software (Bio-Rad). ΔCt, ΔΔCt and relative concentration (R) values were computed as follows:
ΔCt=Ct gene of interest  Ct reference gene ΔΔCT=ΔCT  (average ΔCT placebo sample) R=2ΔΔCt.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!