The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Easy spray nanosource

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

The EASY-Spray nanosource is a highly sensitive LC-MS interface designed for use with Thermo Scientific mass spectrometers. It generates a stable and reproducible nanospray for efficient ionization of analytes, enabling the detection of low-abundance compounds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using easy spray nanosource

1

Immunoprecipitation and Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatin fractions were incubated with approximately 30 μL pre-equilibrated M2 anti-FLAG agarose beads (Sigma), rotating at 4°C overnight. After incubation, the flow-through was collected and the beads were washed with 40 CV IP wash buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% NP-40, 1x Protease inhibitor mix, PhosphoStop phosphatase inhibitor). Immunoprecipitates were eluted using 500 μg/ml 3x FLAG peptide (The Francis Crick Institute), dissolved in IP wash buffer, by incubation for 30 min at 4°C . 30 μL of elution fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and subsequently stained with Instant Blue Coomassie. The stained proteins were excised from the polyacrylamide gel, cut into 8 equal slices and submitted to mass spectrometry analysis. Proteins were in-gel digested with trypsin using a Janus Automated Workstation (Perkin Elmer) and peptides were analyzed using a LTQ Orbitrap-Velos mass spectrometer coupled to an Ultimate3000 HPLC and equipped with an EASY-Spray nanosource (ThermoFisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides were loaded on a 50 cm EASY-Spray column (75 μm inner diameter, 2 μm particle size, Thermo Fisher Scientific), equipped with an integrated electrospray emitter. Reverse phase chromatography was performed using the RSLC nano U3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a binary buffer system at a flow rate of 275 nl/min. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid, 5% DMSO, and solvent B was 80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid, 5% DMSO. The in-gel digested samples were run on a linear gradient of solvent B (2 - 30%) in 95.5 min, total run time of 120 min including column conditioning. The nano LC was coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer using an EASY-Spray nano source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The Orbitrap Fusion Lumos was operated in data-dependent acquisition mode acquiring MS1 scan (R = 120,000) in the Orbitrap, followed by HCD MS2 scans in the Ion Trap. The number of selected precursor ions for fragmentation was determined by the “Top Speed” acquisition algorithm with a cycle time set at 3 s. The dynamic exclusion was set at 30 s. For ion accumulation the MS1 target was set to 4 × 105 ions and the MS2 target to 2 × 103 ions. The maximum ion injection time utilized for MS1 scans was 50 ms and for MS2 scans was 300 ms. The HCD normalized collision energy was set at 28 and the ability to inject ions for all available parallelizable time was set to “true.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nano-LC-MS/MS Peptide Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample digests (4 µg in 5% Formic acid) were loaded onto an Acclaim PepMap 0.1 × 20 mm NanoViper C18 peptide trap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 min at a flow rate of 10 µl/min in a 2% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid mobile phase. Peptides were separated using a PepMap RSLC C18, 2 µm particle, 75 µm x 50 cm EasySpray column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a 7.5–30% acetonitrile gradient over 205 min in mobile phase containing 0.1% formic acid and a 300 nl/min flow rate using a Dionex NCS-3500RS UltiMate RSLC nano UPLC system. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS) data was collected using a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer configured with an EasySpray NanoSource (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The instrument was configured for data dependent analysis (DDA) using the MS/DD-MS/MS setup. Full MS resolutions were set to 120,000 at m/z 200, mass range 375–1500, charge state 2–7, full MS AGC target was 400,000, intensity threshold was 5,000, max inject time at 50 ms, and 10 ppm dynamic exclusion for 60 s. AGC target value for fragment spectra was set at 5,000. Isolation mode was quadrupole, isolation width was set at 1.6 m/z, isolation offset was set to off, activation type was CID, collision energy was set to fixed at 35%, maximum injection time set at 300 ms and detector type was IonTrap. All data was acquired in centroid mode using positive polarity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomics Analysis of Mis-annotated STK19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For data base analysis, STK19 detected peptides were downloaded from peptide Atlas (Deutsch et al., 2008 (link)) and Proteomics DB (Schmidt et al., 2018 (link)) latest versions. To minimize unspecific mapping, peptides between 7 and 20, found in more than one experiment and with a maximum of one missed cut site were analyzed. Peptides with the same start or end position were merged for plotting. For the analysis of overexpressed mis-annotated STK19, eluted proteins from immunoprecipitations were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), until the running front had migrated approximately 1–2 cm into the gel (10% NuPAGE, Invitrogen, NP0301), and stained with colloidal Coomassie (InstantBlue, Expedeon). After excision of 8 horizontal gel slices per lane, proteins were in-gel digested with trypsin (Promega/Pierce) using a Janus liquid handling system (Perkin Elmer). Tryptic peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) using an Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer coupled to an Ultimate 3000 uHPLC equipped with an EASY-Spray nanosource (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and acquired in data-dependent mode. The data were searched against the human Uniprot database using the Andromeda search engine. Raw data were processed using MaxQuant v1.6.0.1 (Cox and Mann, 2008 (link)). Peptide intensities were log2 transformed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sensitive DIA-based Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were resuspended in 2% (v/v) Acetonitrile/0.1% (v/v) TFA supplemented with iRT standards (Biognosys) and loaded on a 50 cm Easy Spray PepMap column (75 μm inner diameter, 2 μm particle size, Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an integrated electrospray emitter. Reverse phase chromatography was performed using the RSLC nano U3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a binary buffer system (solvent A: 0.1% v/v Formic acid, 5% v/v DMSO; solvent B: 80% v/v Acetonitrile, 0.1% v/v Formic acid, 5% v/v DMSO) at a flow rate of 275 nL/min. The samples were run on a linear gradient of 2-8% B in 5.5 min, 8-25%B in 54.5 min, 25-40% B in 31 min, and 40-50% B in 7 min with a total run time of 120 min including column conditioning. The nanoLC was coupled to an Orbitrap Eclipse mass spectrometer using an EasySpray nano source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The Orbitrap Eclipse was operated in data-independent mode (DIA) with following settings: MS1 data acquired in the Orbitrap with a resolution of 120,000, max injection time of 20 ms, AGC target of 1e6, in positive ion mode and profile mode, over the mass range 375-1,500 m/z. DIA segments over this mass range (variable size windows, 34 in total) were acquired in the Orbitrap following fragmentation in the HCD cell (30%), with 30,000 resolution over the mass range 200-2000 m/z and with a max injection time of 70 ms and AGC target of 1e6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Analysis of BTN-Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-FLAG immunoprecipitation (Coimmunoprecipitation and Western Blotting) was performed on 5 × 106 CRA123 cells transduced with an empty vector control (EV), FLAG-BTN3A1+HA-BTN3A2, and FLAG-BTNL3+HA-BTNL8. Eluted proteins were subjected to SDS/PAGE until the running front had migrated 1 cm into the gel. Proteins were in-gel digested using trypsin, and peptides were analyzed with an Orbitrap-Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer coupled to an Ultimate3000 HPLC equipped with an EASY-Spray nanosource (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Raw data for triplicate runs were processed using MaxQuant v1.6.0.1, using label-free quantification (MaxLFQ) selected as the quantification algorithm. The proteingroup.txt output table was imported into Perseus software for further processing. LFQ intensities were log2 transformed, and the dataset was filtered for proteins having at least three values in at least one group (each group consisting of triplicate injections). The remaining missing values were imputed using default Perseus settings by drawing from a simulated noise distribution with a down shift of 1.8 and a width of 0.3 compared with the log2 LFQ intensity distribution. Two-sample Welch t tests were performed with a permutation-based FDR set at 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomics Analysis of S. pombe

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein bands were excised and in-gel–digested using trypsin. The peptides were analyzed with an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer coupled to an UltiMate 3000 HPLC equipped with an EASY-Spray nanosource (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Raw data were processed using MaxQuant v1.6.0.1 and searched against a UniProt-extracted S. pombe FASTA file amended to include common contaminants, with phosphorylation (STY), acetylation (K), and methylation (KR) being selected as variable modifications. The proteingroup.txt and phosphoSTY.txt output tables were imported into Perseus software for further processing. All intensity values were log2-transformed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomic Analysis of Toxoplasma gondii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eluted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE until the running front had migrated ~2 cm into the gel and stained with colloidal Coomassie (InstantBlue; Expedeon). After the excision of eight horizontal gel slices per lane, proteins were in-gel digested with trypsin (Promega/Pierce) using a Janus liquid-handling system (PerkinElmer). Tryptic peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) using an Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer coupled to an Ultimate 3000 ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (uHPLC) instrument equipped with an Easy-Spray nanosource (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and acquired in data-dependent mode. The RAW data were searched using the MaxQuant (v1.6.1.0) tool against the T. gondii ME49 databases from ToxoDB (https://toxodb.org)69 (link). Peptide and protein identifications were filtered to a 1% false discovery rate (FDR), and reversed proteins, contaminants, and proteins identified by only a single modification site were removed from the data set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Proteomic Analysis of γTuRC Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified γTuRC was separated by SDS-PAGE and stained using InstantBlue (Expedeon). Protein bands were excised from the gel and analysed by the Francis Crick Institute Proteomics facility. Briefly, Tryptic peptides were analysed using a Q Exactive orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to an Ultimate 3000 HPLC equipped with an EasySpray nano-source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A one-hour method of MS1 orbitrap (60k resolution) followed by top 10 HCD MS2 (35k resolution) produced raw data files. Raw files were analysed in MaxQuant (v1.6.0.13) against the SwissProt Homo sapiens protein database (downloaded June 2019) using the iBAQ algorithm. The canonical GCP2 sequence was replaced with the construct sequence (GCP2-5xGly-TEV-5xGly-mBFP-5xGly-AviTag). Variable modifications of methionine oxidation and protein N-terminal acetylation along with a fixed modification of cysteine carbamidomethylation were selected. The proteingroups.txt file was imported in Perseus (v1.4.0.2) for data analysis. Potential contaminants, reverse sequences and proteins identified by site were removed. iBAQ intensities were log2 transformed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic Analysis of β2AR and 75 kDa Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel-purified bands corresponding to either β2AR-1D4 or the unknown 75 kDa protein were excised from a silver-stained SDS-PAGE gel, alkylated, and subject to in-gel digestion with trypsin. Peptide digests were analyzed by LC–MS using a Dionex NCS-3500RS UltiMate RSLCnano UPLC system for peptide separation and an Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid instrument with an EasySpray nano source for mass analysis (Thermo Scientific). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD046070.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!