The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

75 protocols using nanospray 3 source

1

Phosphoproteomic Analysis of RanGAP1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for co-IP were prepared as described previously with minor modification (Wang et al., 2015 (link)). In brief, anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated Jurkat T cells were lysed and followed by IP with anti-PKC-θ or anti-IgG. IPs immobilized on protein G beads and 1 μg recombinant GST-RanGAP1 protein immobilized on GSH Sepharose beads were separately washed 2× with kinase buffer and mixed to initiate the kinase assay. Reactions were terminated by Laemmli sample buffer, boiled, and resolved on SDS–PAGE. Gel bands of interest were excised and subjected to tryptic digestion. After desalting, the peptides were analyzed by tandem MS. A splitless Ultra 2D Plus system (Eksigent) coupled to the TripleTOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX) with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX) were performed to analyze immunoprecipitated proteins and identify posttranscriptional modification sites of RanGAP1. The search engine ProteinPilot V4.5 was used to assigned potential modification sites with high confidence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol for MS analysis was as described previously by [22 (link)] with slight modifications. Firstly, each fraction was resuspended in buffer A (5% ACN, 0.1% FA) and centrifuged at 20000 × g for 10 min, and the final concentration of the peptide was about 0.5 μg/μl. Subsequently, 10 μl of the supernatant was loaded onto a 2 cm C18 trap of the column LC-20 AD nanoHPLC pump system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The peptides were eluted onto a 10 cm analytical C18 column (inner diameter 75 μm) packed in-house. The samples were loaded at 8 μL/min for 4 min, then the gradient started at 300 nL/min, from 2 to 35% B (95% ACN, 0.1% FA) for 35 min, linear gradient to 60% for 5 min, 80% for 2 min, maintenance for 4 min, and finally returned to 5% for 1 min. The fractions were analyzed using a TripleTOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA). Data were acquired in 250 ms, and as many as 30 product ion scans were collected if a threshold of 120 counts per second (counts/s) was exceeded, with a 2+ to 5+ charge-state and a 15-s dynamic exclusion setting. Each fraction was analyzed by the nano LC-MS/MS as described previously by [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

iTRAQ-Labeled Peptide Fractionation and MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The iTRAQ-labeled peptides were fractionated by RP chromatography using the Shimadzu LC-20AB HPLC Pump system. Each fraction was resuspended in buffer A (5% CAN, 0.1% FA). Centrifuging the mixture at 20,000 × g for ten minutes, we obtained the supernatant, of which the peptide final concentration was approximately 0.5 g/l. Finally, according to the experimental protocol, we can acquire the results. The data were acquired with a 2.5 kV ion spray voltage, 30 psi curtain gas, 15 psi nebulizer gas and interface heater temperature of 150 °C. In addition, the data were obtained with a Triple TOF5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA) and controlled with Analyst 1.6 software (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS Protein Fractionation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each fraction was resuspended in Buffer A (5% ACN, 0.1% FA) and centrifuged at 20000 g for 10 minutes. Then, 10 μL of supernatant was loaded on an LC-20AD nano HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) by the auto-sampler onto a 2-cm C18 trap column. Then, the peptides were eluted onto a 10-cm analytical C18 column (inner diameter of 75 μm) packed in-house. The samples were loaded at 8 μL/min for 4 minutes. Then the 35-minute gradient was run at 300 nL/min starting from 2% to 35% B (95% ACN, 0.1% FA), followed by 5-minute linear gradient to 60% B, then, followed by 2-minute linear gradient to 80% B, maintained at 80% B for 4 minutes, and finally restored to 5% B within 1 minute.
Data acquisition was performed with a TripleTOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) fitted with a Nanospray IIIsource (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry was performed as previously described [27 (link)] with minor modifications. Proteins from whole extracts of IPAM, BPAM and SAM from three individuals were precipitated using cold acetone (repeated until DTT scent was not detectable), then subjected to trypsin digest at 37°C overnight (1 µg of trypsin per 50 µg of extracted protein; modified porcine trypsin, sequencing grade from Promega). Tryptic peptides were analysed by reverse-phase HPLC-ESI-MS/MS using an Eksigent NanoLC 400 2D Ultra Plus HPLC system connected to a TripleTOF 6000 quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada). After injection, peptide mixtures were transferred to a AB Sciex column (3C18-CL 75 µm × 15 cm) and eluted at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1. MS data was acquired using the TripleTOF 6000 mass spectrometer fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB Sciex) using a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Peptide Identification Using Nano-LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Buffer A (0.1% formic acid, 2% ACN) was added to dried peptides. Mass spectrometry was performed with an Eksigent nanoLC Ultra 2D plus system (AB SCIEX, CA) coupled with a Triple TOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, MA). The peptide samples underwent injection into a C18 nanoLC trap column (C18, 100 μm × 3 cm, 3 μm, 150 Å) and were washed using 2% ACN (0.1% formic acid) for 10 min at 2 μL/min. Peptides were eluted using a gradient of 5–35% ACN (0.1% FA) over 70 min with an analytical ChromXP C18 column (C18, 75 μm × 15 cm, 3 μm 120 Å) with a spray tip, and were then introduced into the mass spectrometer which was fitted with a NanoSpray III source (AB SCIEX, Canada). This mass spectrometer operated in a data-dependent manner. A cyclic series of a full mass spectrometry scans was then acquired in 250 ms periods, with a dynamic exclusion of 18 s. The total cycle time was fixed at 2.5 s. Collision-induced dissociation was performed using a rolling collision energy setting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fractionated Peptide Analysis by Triple Quadrupole TOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fractionated peptides were analyzed using a triple quadrupole TOF 5600 system (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON, USA) and pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA, USA). Data were acquired using an ion spray voltage of 2.5 kV, curtain gas of 30 PSI, nebulizer gas of 6 PSI, and interface heater temperature of 150°C. The mass spectrometer was operated with an RP of 30,000 FWHM for TOF-MS scans. For information-dependent acquisition, survey scans were acquired at 250 ms. A total of 20 product ion scans were collected, and ions exhibited a charged state of +2 to +5 if 125 counts per second were exceeded. A rolling collision energy setting was applied to all precursor ions for collision-induced dissociation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanoflow LC-MS/MS Peptide Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each fraction was resuspended in buffer A (5% ACN, 0.1% FA) and centrifuged at 20000 g for 10 min. The average final peptide concentration was approximately 0.5 μg/μl. Then, we loaded 10μl of supernatant onto a 2cm C18 trap column in an LC-20AD Nano HPLC pump system using an auto sampler. The samples were loaded at 8 μl/min for 4 min and eluted at 300 nL/min for35 min with a 2% to 35% gradient of solution B (95% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). The samples were separated with a 5-min linear gradient to 60% solution B, maintained at 80% solution B for 2 min, and finally returned to 5% solution B over 1 min. Data acquisition was performed with a Triple TOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA). Data were acquired at 250 ms intervals, and as many as 30 product ion scans were collected if a threshold of 120 counts per second (counts/s) was exceeded with a 2+ to 5+ charge-state and a 15-s dynamic exclusion setting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanobore HPLC-MS/MS for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fractions obtained from the strong cation-exchange column were pooled, lyophilized, and reconstituted in 20 μL 0.1% TFA before analysis by nanobore HPLC-MS/MS, using an LC-20AD nano HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), an Agilent 1100 Nanoflow LC system coupled online with a linear ion trap–Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Data acquisition was performed with a TripleTOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON, Canada) fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Peptide Separation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides were separated on an Easy-nLC II HPLC system (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a trap column (ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ (5 μm, 2 cm x 100 μm I.D., Thermo Scientific) and an analytical column (ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ column, 3 μm, 10 cm x 75 μm I.D., Thermo Scientific) in-line to a NanoSpray III source (AB Sciex) connected to a TripleTOF 5600 mass spectrometer (AB Sciex) operated under Analyst TF 1.5.1 control. Peptides were eluted at a constant flow of 250 nl/min with a 50 min gradient from 5 to 35 % solvent B (90 % ACN, 0.1 % formic acid) followed by re-equilibration for 10 min back to the starting conditions. Information dependent acquisition was employed acquiring up to 25 MS/MS spectra per cycle using 1.6 s cycle time with an exclusion window of 6 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!