The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using ssofast evagreen supermixes

1

Gene Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, reverse transcription, and PCR were performed as previously described31 (link) The amplified DNA was separated on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. For real-time PCR, the CFX96 qPCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used. Reactions were carried out in 96-well optical reaction plates in a 20 μl final volume containing 10 μl of the 2X SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermixes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 1 μl of each gene-specific forward primer, 1 μl of each gene-specific reverse primer, 1 μl of diluted cDNA sample, and 7 μl of water. After an initial denaturing step for 10 min at 95 °C, conditions for cycling were set to 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 58 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. The changes in gene expression were quantified by the comparative Ct method by calculating the relative fold changes normalized against β-actin expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA synthesis and PCR were performed as previously described [14 (link)]. The amplified DNA was separated using 2%agarose gels and stained with LoadingStar (Dynebio, Korea). For real-time PCR, the CFX96 qPCR system (Bio-Rad) was used. Reactions were carried out in 96-well optical reaction plates in a 20 μl final volume containing 10 μl of the 2X SsoFast EvaGreen Supermixes (Bio-Rad), 1 μl of each gene-specific forward primer, 1 μl of each gene-specific reverse primer, 1 μl of diluted cDNA sample, and 7 μl of water. After an initial denaturing step for 10 min at 95°C, conditions for cycling were set to 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 30 s at 72°C. The changes in gene expression were quantified by the comparative Ct method by calculating the relative fold changes normalized against β-actin expression [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Alfalfa Root Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alfalfa roots were collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until further use. Approximately 100 mg fresh weight was used for total RNA extraction using Total RNA Purification Kit (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada, Cat #25800) for roots. Tissue was homogenized using a PowerLyzer®24 bench top bead-based homogenizer (Cat #13155) according to the manufacturer’s manual. Approximately 500 ng of Turbo DNase (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat #AM1907) treated RNA was used to generate cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA, Cat # 1708891). Transcript levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR using a CFX96 TouchTM Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) and SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermixes (Bio-Rad Cat # 1725204) using gene-specific primers. Each reaction consisted of 2 μL of cDNA template, 0.5 μL forward and reverse gene-specific primers (10 μM each) (Table S1), and 5 μL SsoFast Eva green Supermix, then topped up to 10 μL with ddH2O. For each sample three or four biological replicates were analyzed, and each biological replicate was tested using three technical replicates. Transcript levels were analyzed relative to two reference genes: actin–depolymerizing protein 1 (ADF1) and elongation initiation factor 4A (elF4A) (primers are listed in Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Silicon and Defense Hormone Genes in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relative expression pattern of silicon transporter genes viz. EcLsi1, EcLsi2, and EcLsi6 and defense hormone regulating genes viz. SAM (Ethylene), LOX (Salicylic acid), and PAL (Jasmonic acid) were analyzed using qPCR (CFX96TM Real-Time System, Bio-Rad, USA) using SSO Fast Eva Green Supermixes (BioRad, USA) following manufacturer’s instruction. The housekeeping gene, EcActin, was used as an internal control for normalization of data obtained. Reaction conditions for thermal cycling were 95 °C for 60 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 15 s, then 72 °C for 30 s. Fluorescence data were collected during the cycle at 60 °C. The melting curve was used as an internal check for assessing quality of the gene amplification. The experiments were repeated twice independently with three replicates each time. The threshold cycles (Ct) were used to find the relative expression level of all the genes over control using the comparative 2−ΔΔCt method62 (link). Gene specific primers used in this study are listed in Table S6 and S7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative PCR for BcoAT gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The number of copies of BcoAT genes was determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), using the methods described by Louis et al. [13 (link)] with modifications. The PCR reaction was performed in a total volume of 10 µL using the SsoFast EvaGreen® Supermixes (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with 500 nM of each of the forward [GCNGANCATTTCACNTGGAAYWSNTGGCAYATG] and reverse primers [CCTGCCTTTGCAATRTCNACRAANGC] and 1 µL of DNA samples. Amplification and detection of DNA by real-time PCR were performed with the BioRad CFX384 Real Time System in duplicate. The reaction conditions for amplification were 98 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 45 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Aortic Tissue RNA Extraction and qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The abdominal aorta was harvested, cleaned of perivascular adipose tissue, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80ºC. RNA was extracted using an QIAgen RNEASY kit as per manufacturer guidelines, and cDNA was synthesized using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative PCR was performed using SsoFast EvaGreen Supermixes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and Bio-Rad CFX™ Real Time system. The 2−ΔΔCt was used to quantify relative gene expression. Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying MICU1 mRNA Knockdown in HEK293 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell RNA was extracted from HEK 293 cells grown in 6-well plates using TRIzol. Residual DNA was removed using the TURBO DNA-free kit (Life Technologies). First strand cDNA synthesis was performed with 1 μg RNA using M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (NEB), following manufacturer’s instructions. The sample was subsequently digested with RNaseH (NEB). qPCR was performed with SsoFast EvaGreen Supermixes (BIO-RAD), using 0.5 μM β-actin or MICU1 primers, and 0.5, 2.5, 5, or 10 ng RNA for producing a standard curve. Detection of the PCR product was done with a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (BIO-RAD), using the following protocol: 95°C for 30 s, 50 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 57°C for 5 s. The sequence of the primers is provided in Supplementary file 1.
ΔCt was calculated by subtracting the Ct for β-actin from the Ct for MICU1, with 3 independent RNA extractions and qPCR measurements using 2.5 ng whole RNA. ΔΔCt was calculated by subtracting the mean ΔCt for control WT cells from the mean ΔCt for each stable MICU1 knockdown cells. The results were presented as the percentage of MICU1 mRNA in MICU1 knockdown cells relative to MICU1 mRNA in WT control, using the equation% mRNA = 1/2|ΔΔCt|.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultra-fast EvaGreen-based qPCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ultra-fast PCR analyzes on the same principle as SYBR green based real-time PCR, except that Evagreen dye is used instead of SYBR green as an intercalating dye.
The PCR analysis was performed on the GENECHECKER UF-150 Ultra-fast Real-Time qPCR system (Genesystem, Daejeon, Korea) with Rapi:chip™. For the final reaction volume 10 µL, 5 µL of SSO Fast™ EvaGreen Supermixes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Berkeley, CA, USA), 1 µL of each forward and reverse primer (0.8 µM), and 2 µL of the DNA template were used. All ultra-fast PCR assays were performed under the following conditions: 1 cycle of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s; annealing at 58 °C for 5 s; extension at 72 °C for 5 s; 1 cycle of elongation at 72 °C for 5 s. No template control (NTC) was used as the negative control in the ultra-fast PCR reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

mRNA Quantification through qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total mRNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. mRNA was converted into cDNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Quantitative PCR was performed on 96‐well plates using SsoFast EvaGreen Supermixes (Bio‐Rad) with the Bio‐Rad CFX™ Real‐Time System. Gene expression was normalized to 18s, and fold change was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences are provided in the Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Murine Papillomavirus Transcript Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, DNA from mice tails was collected via swabbing the challenge site with buccal swabs and extracted as described in http://home.ccr.cancer.gov/lco/VirionExtraction.htm. PCR reaction assays were performed with primers forward 5’-GGTCAAAAGGGCAGCGTCTA-3’, reverse 5’-TGCTTCCCCTCTTCCGTTTT-3’ and were run using SsoFast EvaGreen Supermixes (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Primers were assessed for specificity and sensitivity (S3 Fig). Analysis of MusPV E1^E4 mRNA transcript by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed as described in [33 (link)]. Briefly, mouse tail tissue specimens were flash frozen and stored at -80°C. Tissues were disrupted using a frozen mortar and pestle and homogenized with QIAshredders (Qiagen). RNA for qRT-PCR was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). cDNA was generated using iScript Advanced cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad) and run using TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Primer sequences were E1^E4-forward, 5′-CATTCGAGTCACTGCTTCTGC-3′; E1^E4-reverse, 5′-GATGCAGGTTTGTCGTTCTCC-3′; E1^E4-probe, 5′-6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM)-TGGAAAACGATAAAGCTCCTCCTCAGCC-6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA)-3′. Beta-actin primers (Life Technologies) was used to normalize DNA collection. Triplicate reactions were performed for each primer-probe set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!