The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Signa hdxt system

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The Signa HDxt system is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner developed by GE Healthcare. It is designed to produce high-quality images of the body's internal structures and functions. The Signa HDxt system utilizes advanced technology to enable efficient and accurate data acquisition, processing, and visualization. Its core function is to provide healthcare professionals with the necessary tools for diagnostic and clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using signa hdxt system

1

Multimodal MRI Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI scans were performed using a 1.5-Tesla GE Signa HDxt system (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a maximum gradient amplitude of 33 mTm-1 and a proprietary head coil. Patients were neutrally positioned in the head coil using an alignment marker at the nasal bridge to standardise head position. Foam pads and a Velcro strap across the forehead were used to minimise head movement during the scan.
The imaging protocol lasted approximately 45 minutes and included the following scan sequences which all provided whole head coverage: I. axial Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR): repetition time (TR) = 9000ms, echo time (TE) = 130ms, inversion time (TI) = 2200ms, 28 slices of 5mm thickness without slice gap, field of view (FOV) = 240x240mm2, matrix = 256x192; II. coronal T1-weighted spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR): TR = 11.5ms, TE = 5ms, 176 slices without slice gap, FOV = 240x240mm2, matrix = 256x192, flip angle = 18°, providing 1.1mm3 isotropic voxels; and III. axial single shot spin echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging: TR = 15600ms, TE = 93.4ms, 55 slices without slice gap with isotropic voxels of 2.5mm3, FOV = 240x240 mm2, matrix = 96x96, 8 non-diffusion-weighted images (b = 0 smm-2) followed by diffusion-weighted volumes with diffusion gradients applied (b = 1000 smm-2) in 25 non-collinear directions and the negative of these.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MRI-based Total Gray Matter Volume Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Among adults, we obtained 842 T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with two 3T General Electric platforms: 411 scans were obtained using a GE 3T Signa HDxt scanner with an eight-channel head, and 431 scans using a GE 3T Discovery 750 scanner with a 32-channel head coil. Among adolescents, 85 T1-weighted MRI scans were obtained using the same scanners: 49 scans were acquired using the GE Signa HDxt system and 36 scans were acquired using the GE Discovery 750 system. The acquisition sequences used are described in online Supplementary material.
In order to obtain the TGMV, all MRI scans were processed using FreeSurfer v6.0 (Fischl, 2012 (link)). TGMV was calculated as the sum of the cerebral cortical volume, the subcortical grey matter and the cerebellum grey matter (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MorphometryStats). Quality inspection and editing was performed by trained research assistants following standard FreeSurfer procedures (McCarthy et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

T2-weighted MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects were scanned at 3 T using T2-weighted, axial acquisition sequences with a scan time of 5 min and 8 s. MRI data was acquired on either a Siemens TrioTim system or GE Medical Systems SignaHDxt system. The resolution ranged from 0.49 mm × 0.49 mm × 2.0 mm to 0.94 mm × 0.94 mm × 3.0 mm, TR (repetition time) ranged from 3000 to 4500 ms, TE (echo time) ranged from 11 to 105.98 ms, flip angle was either 90° or 150°, and matrix size ranged from 204 × 256 × 48 voxels to 512 × 512 × 84 voxels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Imaging Protocol for Cancer Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the imaging exams were performed in the same technical equipment.
CT scans were performed using a 16-section multidetector row CT scanner (Philips Brilliance Big Bore, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH). Head and neck CT was performed after administration of 80–120 mL of a nonionic contrast (Optiray 320; Mallinckrodt). MRI examinations were performed at 1.5 T MR scan (SignaHDxT system, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). MRI protocol included axial T1-and T2-weighted images, coronal T2-weighted fat saturated images and T1-weighted images after intravenous administration of gadolinium-based paramagnetic contrast agent (10 ml of gadoversetamide, Optimark® Mallinckrodt). Two experienced medical radiologists reviewed all CT and MRI images.
Whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed 60 minutes after intravenous injection of 0.154 mCi/Kg of 18F-FDG (IPEN-CNEN). Patients with normal blood glucose levels were injected at rest and after at least 4 hours of fasting. Both low dose CT and dedicated PET imaging protocols, starting from the head to the proximal thigh, were acquired in a 64 channel PET/CT (Gemini TOF, Philips Medical Systems). Nuclear medicine specialists with 15 and 25 years of experience reviewed images and SUV data in concordance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

3D Breast Tumor Modeling from MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A retrospective single-institute study was conducted at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Twenty-five breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included from October 2015 and October 2017. Approval from the medical ethics committee was obtained before the start of the study (MEC 2015-647) . Patients were only included after informed consent and if the lesion was entirely inside the breast tissue (tumor stage < cT4). For the current study, and after receiving approval from the medical ethics committee (MEC-2019-0531), fully anonymized contrast enhanced MRI data of the 25 breast cancer patients were evaluated to generate 3D electromagnetic breast models. 3D models were generated from the available 3D Fat-suppressed T1-weighted Gradient Echo sequences with the following MRI parameters: fl3d sequence, TE = 6.02 ms, TR = 12.20 ms, FOV 360 mm, slice thickness 1.0 mm, flip angle 10°, acquisition size 448 × 380 × 144, reconstruction matrix size 512 × 512 × 144, and averaging 1 on a 1.5 T Siemens Avanto system; and VIBRANT sequence, TE = 2.48 ms, TR = 5.23 ms, FOV 340 mm, slice thickness 2.2 mm, flip angle 12°, acquisition size 512 × 360 × 82, reconstruction matrix size 512 × 512 × 82, and averaging 1 on a 1.5 T GE Signa HDxt system. The MRI device used for each patient was chosen based on clinical routine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!