The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vmax229d

Manufactured by Cardinal Health
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Vmax229D is a piece of laboratory equipment designed for performing spectrophotometric analysis. It measures the absorbance or transmittance of light passing through a sample to determine the concentration of a specific substance.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using vmax229d

1

Standardized Lung Function Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry was performed according to the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society using a Vmax 22 system (SensorMedics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) or a PFDX machine (MedGraphics, St Paul, MN, USA). FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC values were determined as absolute values. Lung volume was measured by body plethysmography (V6200; SensorMedics or PFDX). Diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide was measured using the single-breath method and a Vmax229D (SensorMedics) or a Masterlab Body (Jaeger AB, Würtsburg, Germany). We used equations obtained from a representative Korean sample to obtain the percent predicted FVC and FEV1 values.26
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized Pulmonary Function Assessments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method for pulmonary function tests have been described previously15 (link). Spirometry was performed by using a Vmax 22 (Sensor-Medics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) or a PFDX (MedGraphics, St. Paul, MN, USA). To assess post-bronchodilator FEV1 increases, spirometry was performed before bronchodilation and 15 minutes after inhalation of salbutamol 400 µg through a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer. Bronchodilator reversibility was evaluated by measuring post-bronchodilator FEV1 increase in liters. Lung volumes were measured by body plethysmography (V6200; Sensor-Medics or PFDX). Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) was measured by the single-breath method using a Vmax229D (Sensor-Medics) or a Masterlab Body (Jaeger AB, Würtsburg, Germany). All pulmonary function tests were performed as recommended by the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lung Function Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry was performed according to the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS), using a Vmax 22 (Sensor-Medics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) or a PFDX (MedGraphics, St. Paul, MN, USA) [21 (link)]. The percentage predicted values (% predicted) for FEV1 and FVC were calculated from equations obtained in a representative Korean sample [22 (link)]. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) was measured by the single-breath method using a Vmax229D (Sensor-Medics) or a Masterlab Body (Jaeger AB, Würtsburg, Germany), following recommendations of the ATS/ERS protocol [23 (link)]. The predicted values of DLco were calculated from Park’s equation formulated using data from a healthy Korean population [24 ]. The six-minute walking distance test (6MWD) was performed according to the ATS guideline [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Pulmonary Function Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry, maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), and inspiratory capacity (IC) at rest were performed on a V-MAX 229d (Sensormedics Inc., Yorba Linda, CA, United States). A certified 3-L syringe was used for calibration. Flows and volumes were reported according to BTPS conditions (body temperature, ambient pressure, saturated with water vapor). Spirometry was done according to the standards of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society, and Crapo reference equations were used (Crapo et al., 1981 (link); Miller et al., 2005 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detailed Food Intake and Energy Expenditure Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Food models were employed to estimate the consumed food quantities. Furthermore, an experienced dietitian analyzed food diaries via the Food Processor Program (version 7.4, ESHA Research, Salem, OR, USA), including local-traditional food references [42 (link),43 (link),44 (link),50 (link)]. ICC ranged from 0.850 to 0.901. Participants’ physical activity and energy expenditure during the 7-day recording period were evaluated through Garmin Vivoactive 3 smartwatch activity tracker (Digital Tracer Electronics S.A., Alimos, Attika, Greece; ICC: 0.92) [42 (link),43 (link)]. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER), were evaluated through indirect calorimetry (Vmax 229D, Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA), with participants in a prone position for 20 min [50 (link)] (ICC: 0.897; 95% CI: Lower = 0.85, Upper = 0.94; p < 0.0001, n = 10).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ramp Incremental Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants underwent a ramp incremental CPET on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (Ergoline 800; Sensor Medics, Anaheim, CA, United States), before and after completion of the program. Individualized workload increments were estimated according to the equation of Hansen et al[20 (link)]. Gas exchange was measured with the patient breathing through a low resistance valve, with the nose clamped, using an ergospirometry system (Vmax229D; Sensor Medics) calibrated with a known gas mixture before each test. Respiratory indicators (breath-by-breath oxygen uptake [VO2], carbon dioxide output [VCO2] and ventilation [VE]) were measured. Peripheral O2 saturation was monitored continuously by pulse oximetry. Heart rate and rhythm were monitored by a MAX 1, 12-lead electrocardiographic system (Marquette Electronics, Milwaukee, WI, United States) and blood pressure was measured every 2 min with a mercury sphygmomanometer. All patients were verbally encouraged to exercise to intolerable leg fatigue or dyspnea. CPET variables employed in the study were VO2peak and peak workload (Wpeak). VO2peak was determined as the average value of VO2 data measured at the final 20-s period of the exercise phase, and Wpeak as the corresponding work rate[20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Pulmonary Function Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry and DLco were performed using Vmax229D instrument (SensorMedics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) recommendations and extrapolated to ages over 7 years [14 (link), 16 (link)]. Reference equations from a study by Morris et al. were used for spirometric parameters and from Polgar et al. for DLco [17 (link)]. We considered a percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) less than 80% to be abnormal [18 (link)]. Patterns of spirometry abnormality were defined as follows: normal [FEV1/FVC ≥ lower limit of normal (LLN) and FVC ≥ LLN], restrictive, (FEV1/FVC > LLN and FVC < LLN), obstructive (FEV1/FVC < LLN, FVC > LLN and FEV1 < LLN), and mixed (FEV1/FVC < LLN and FVC < LLN) [19 (link)]. Corrected DLco (adjusted for Hb, as recommended by the ATS/ERS [14 (link)]) less than 80% was defined as a significant diffusion defect [20 (link)–22 (link)]. The severity of the corrected DLco of 60 to 80%, 40 to 60%, and less than 40% were classified as mild, moderate, and severe abnormalities, respectively [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Lung Function in Asthma Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry was performed using a Vmax 22 instrument (Sensor-Medics; Yorba Linda, CA, USA) or a PFDX machine (MedGraphics, St Paul, MN, USA), as recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society.12 FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC were evaluated both before and 15 min after inhalation of 400 μg albuterol. Lung volume was measured by body plethysmography (V600, Sensor-Medics, or PFDX). DLCO was assessed by the single-breath method using a Vmax229D (Sensor-Medics) or a Masterlab Body (Jaeger AB, Wurtsburg, Germany) instrument. Absolute values of FVC and FEV1 were obtained, and the percentage of the predicted value (% predicted) for FEV1 and FVC was calculated from equations formulated using data from a population of healthy non-smoking Koreans.13 Spirometry was conducted at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Treadmill Test for VO2max Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The players performed an incremental (0.5 km/h increase each 1 min step) treadmill (Technogym Runrace, Gambettola, Italy) test until voluntary exhaustion to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), maximal heart rate (Polar Electro, Finland) and running speeds corresponding to 55 and 95% of VO2max. Expired respiratory gas fractions were measured using an open circuit breath-by-breath automated gas-analysis system (Vmax 229D, Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Standardized Pulmonary Function Assessments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method for pulmonary function tests have been described previously5 . Spirometry was performed by using a Vmax 22 (Sensor-Medics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) or a PFDX (MedGraphics, St Paul, MN, USA). To assess post-bronchodilator FEV1 increases, spirometry was performed before bronchodilation and 15 minutes after inhalation of salbutamol 400 µg through a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer. Bronchodilator reversibility was evaluated by measuring post-bronchodilator FEV1 increase in liters. Lung volumes were measured by body plethysmography (V6200; Sensor-Medics or PFDX). Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) was measured by the single-breath method using a Vmax229D (Sensor-Medics) or a Masterlab Body (JaegerAB, Würtsburg, Germany). All pulmonary function tests were performed as recommended by the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!