The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mastercycler realplex2 system

Manufactured by Eppendorf
Sourced in United States

The Mastercycler Realplex2 system is a real-time PCR thermal cycler designed for quantitative analysis of nucleic acid samples. The system features a thermoblock that can accommodate a variety of sample formats and supports multiple detection channels for multiplexed analysis. The Mastercycler Realplex2 system is capable of performing real-time quantitative PCR experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using mastercycler realplex2 system

1

Strand-Specific RT-qPCR Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of cDNA was performed as described, using both oligo (dT) and random hexamers (15 (link)). For strand-specific RT-qPCR, the indicated reverse transcription primers were used in the RT reaction, followed by inactivation of the RT enzyme. The resulting cDNA was used in qPCR reactions with Biorad SYBR Green Kit (Biorad) on a Mastercycler Realplex2 system (Eppendorf) and analyzed as described (15 (link)). Error bars represent the SEM from at least two technical repeats and two biological repeats per experiment. To determine the statistical significance of observed differences, p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test with p-values <0.05 considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Target RNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determining target RNA levels upon induction of sRNA, overnight cultures of PAO1 or PAO1 sRNA deletion mutants, carrying either the empty plasmid pKH6 or pKH6-sRNA, were grown in LB with gentamicin. The following morning, the cultures were diluted to an OD600 0.02 and the bacteria were grown at 37°C with shaking. When OD600 reached 0.5, sRNA was overexpressed for 1 hr by adding L-arabinose to 0.2%. RNA extraction, DNA removal and cDNA synthesis were performed as described above. Quantitative PCR was carried out with the PerfeCTa SYBR Green FastMix (Quanta Biosciences) on a Mastercycler Realplex2 system (Eppendorf) according to the manufacture’s instructions. The primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Supporting Information Table S4. RNA level of genes relative to the housekeeping gene proC (Savli et al., 2003 (link)) were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Iron Metabolism Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was harvested using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) and 2 μg RNA were used to make cDNA. Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used on a Mastercycler Realplex2 system (Eppendorf). Actin was used as a control housekeeping gene. The ΔΔCt method was used to compare the variation of transcripts among samples. Specificity and efficiency were checked before using this method. Primers for mouse genes included Actin forward 5′-GACGGCCAAGTCATCACTATTG-3′, Actin reverse 5′-CCACAGGATTCCATACCCAAGA-3′, LcytB forward 5′- CGAGAATCGCACACCTCTACTC-3′, LcytB reverse 5′-TTTCAGGAGGCTTCGCAGCCAC-3′, Steap2 forward 5′-GAGCAACGCTTTGAACTGGAGAG-3′, Steap2 reverse 5′-GGCAAGAACGAAGTTTGGTGGTG-3′, Steap3 forward 5′- TCTTCAGCACCGCCAGTCTAAC-3′, Steap3 reverse 5′- CTGGCTGATCACTGCAGATGAG-3′, Steap4 forward 5′-GGGAATCACTTCCTTGCCATCAG-3′, Steap4 reverse 5′-TCCGCCATACACCAAAGTGTGG-3′, DMT1 forward 5′-TTGCAGCGAGACTTGGAGTGGT-3′, DMT1 reverse 5′-GCTGAGCCAATGACTTCCTGCA-3′, transferrin receptor 1 (Tfrc1) forward 5′-GAAGTCCAGTGTGGGAACAGGT-3′, Tfrc1 reverse 5'-CAACCACTCAGTGGCACCAACA-3', Fpn forward 5′- CCATAGTCTCTGTCAGCCTGCT-3′, Fpn reverse 5′-CTTGCAGCAACTGTGTCACCGT-3′,
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Mouse Testis mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mRNA samples were isolated from mouse testes using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) and reverse transcribed using the Verso cDNA synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). For quantitative PCR, primers were designed using online software (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and probes were purchased from Universal ProbeLibrary (Roche). Roche 480 LightCycler (Roche) was used for probe-based real-time PCR. GoTaq qPCR master mix (Promega, Madison, WI) was used for experiments using BRYT dye on the Mastercycler RealPlex2 system (Eppendorf, Westbury, NY). The relative fold change in gene mRNA level was calculated by the comparative cycle threshold (2–ΔΔCt) method using 18S rRNA for normalization of the expression data. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. The number of animals used in each group is shown in figure legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Pseudomonas aeruginosa RNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the determination of RNA levels by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), P. aeruginosa strains were grown with the indicated concentrations of either arabinose (depletion experiments) or antibiotics for either 4 or 6 h. RNA was then prepared from these cultures using the hot acid phenol procedure as described above. Primers were designed by the use of the GenScript real-time PCR primer design tool. cDNA was synthesized with a SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system for reverse transcription-PCR (Invitrogen) and random hexamer primers. RT-qPCR was carried out using PerfeCTa SYBR green FastMix (Quanta Biosciences) in a Mastercycler Realplex2 system from Eppendorf. Changes in transcript levels relative to the levels in the untreated control cultures were calculated. Growth and compound exposures for RNA extractions for the RT-qPCR experiments were performed twice (biological replicates) on different days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative RNA Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested in mid-log phase, resuspended in 1 ml of TRIzol (Invitrogen), and incubated for 5 min at room temperature before the addition of 200 μl of chloroform. Samples were centrifuged at 13,000 relative centrifugal force (rcf) for 10 min. The aqueous phase was mixed with 200 μl of 100% ethanol, and the mixture was transferred to Purelink RNA Mini columns (Invitrogen) for purification following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was treated with Turbo DNase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The KAPA SYBER FAST One-Step quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) kit (Kapa Biosystems) was used to measure mRNA abundance on the Eppendorf Mastercycler RealPlex2 system. Relative gene expression changes were calculated using the Livak method (55 (link)). The primers used for the detection of hcp-1 and ctxA are listed in Table S5. The reference gene used was gyrA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Antibiotic-induced RNA Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determination of RNA levels by quantitative PCR (qPCR), various concentrations of antibiotic were first tested in cultures grown in 20-ml volumes. The concentrations of antibiotics that were twice the lowest level required to inhibit growth, determined by measurement of the optical density (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), were selected, and in a subsequent experiment cells were incubated with those concentrations for 30 min. RNA was then prepared from these cultures with the hot acid phenol procedure as described above. Primers were designed by use of the GenScript real-time PCR primer design tool. cDNA was synthesized with a SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system for reverse transcription-PCR (Invitrogen) and random hexamer primers. The qPCR was carried out using PerfeCTa SYBR Green FastMix (Quanta Biosciences) in a Mastercycler Realplex2 system from Eppendorf. Changes in transcript levels relative to the levels in the untreated control cultures were calculated. The growth and exposure for RNA extractions for the qPCR experiments with 30-min compound exposures were performed twice (biological replicates) on different days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNeasy Mini Kit (74104; Qiagen, DE) was used to prepare RNA samples. Then, cDNA synthesis followed the manufacture’s guideline for the SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA; 18080093). Online supplemental table 1 and 2 show probes and primers, respectively. Data were collected and analyzed using an Eppendorf Mastercycler RealPlex2 system (Eppendorf, DE). The fold-change (FC) between reaction control, experimental control, and target groups was calculated using the 2-∆∆Ct method (Gapdh as a housekeeping gene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was purified from whole cell lysates using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. RNA was reverse-transcribed using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). Gene-specific primers in combination with Universal Probe Library probes and Universal Master mix (Roche) were run on a Mastercycler Realplex2 system (Eppendorf). Cycling conditions were 50°C, 2 min; 95°C, 10 min; followed by 40 (2-step) cycles (95°C, 15 sec; 60°C, 60 sec). Relative quantification to the control (cyclophilin B) was done using the comparative Ct method. The values plotted are the average from 3 PCR reactions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Leishmania infantum Parasitic Load

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMC DNA was extracted using a phenol-chloroform protocol [40 ]. Extracted DNA was analyzed on the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer for purity evaluation (260/280) and quantification.
For Leishmania infantum parasitic load quantification, qPCR was used, employing primers that amplify the intergenic spacer internal transcript (ITS1) segment of the parasite rRNA gene at a concentration of 10mM (5’TCCAGCACATTTTGCGA GTA3’ and 5’CCACACAGGTTTCTTCTTTATTTGG3’) [41 (link)]. qPCR reaction was standardized with 30 ng purified genomic DNA, 12.5 μL SYBR Green JumpStart Taq ReadyMix (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 5 pmol of each primer, and 9.5 μL of ultrapure H2O in a final reaction volume of 25 μL. We also generated a ten-fold standard curve using extracted DNA from Leishmania infantum promastigotes (MHOM/BR00/MER02) for parasite quantification. Reactions were performed using a Mastercycler RealPlex2 system (Eppendorf, CT, USA) under the following conditions: Initial heating of 94°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 15 s), annealing, and extension (58°C for 1 min). After these steps, a dissociation curve of the amplified fragment was determined (95°C for 15 s, then 60°C to 95° C at 15 s/°C). Parasitic DNA load was determined in each sample by comparing each sample to the standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!