The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gt3x monitor

Manufactured by ActiGraph
Sourced in United States

The ActiGraph GT3X+ monitor is a compact and versatile wearable device designed for activity and sleep monitoring. It features a triaxial accelerometer that measures physical movement in three dimensions, providing detailed data on an individual's activity levels and patterns. The GT3X+ is capable of continuous data collection and can be used to track a wide range of physical activities, from sedentary behavior to high-intensity exercise.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using gt3x monitor

1

Actigraphy Monitoring of Light Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ActiGraph™ GT3X+ monitors (Actigraph™; LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA) with lux meters were used to gather exposure to light in our participants. These actigraphy monitors include triaxial accelerometers that identify movement, steps, kilocalories, as well as lux. The monitors have 512MB of memory and activity and light collection occurred at 30 Hz. Participants wore the monitor for seven consecutive days and nights on their non-dominant wrist. Typical lux level estimates for the GT3X+ were as follows (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Objective Physical Activity Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physical activity was objectively measured using Actigraph GT3X monitors over a 7-day period. Participants were instructed to wear the monitor on their waist during waking hours. Only participants with ≥4 valid days of ≥10 h/day were included. Non-wear was defined as ≥90 min with 0 counts/min, allowing up to 2 consecutive min of <100 counts/min [27 (link)]. Physical activity was categorised as sedentary (<100 counts/min), light (100–2019 counts/min), and moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) (≥2020 counts/min) [28 (link)]. Total MVPA and bouts of ≥10 MVPA min were examined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Activity and Energy Expenditure in Monkeys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Activity levels and energy expenditure were measured for 24 hours during month 4 of the baseline phase and during months 11 and 28 of the treatment phase. Prior to data collection, the monkeys were sedated (15 mg/kg ketamine HCl), outfitted with ActiGraph GT3X monitors (ActiGraph, Pensacola, Florida) in the pocket of the mesh jacket, and allowed to recover for 24 hours before recording. Activity was expressed as the mean of the counts summed over 24 hours as previously described (16 (link),17 (link)). Energy expenditure was calculated as energy expenditure = 0.045 cal × BW × activity (17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ActiGraph-Based Physical Activity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physical activity was assessed by ActiGraph GT3X tri-axial accelerometers (Actigraph LLC., Pensacola, FL, U.S.A.). Participants were asked to wear the ActiGraph GT3X monitors all day on an elastic belt on their waist, for seven consecutive days, and to remove the monitors when showering, bathing, and swimming and for bed at night. The data collection interval was set at one second epoch with a minimum of 10 hours of wear constituting a valid monitored day. One valid day was required to be included in the analysis (23 (link)). Monitor wear logs were used to confirm wear dates and define the waking day, and the Choi algorithm was used to estimate non-wear time during this period. The vertical axis total activity counts per day (TAC/d) variable was defined as the mean daily activity counts accumulated on valid monitoring days. Mean activity counts per minute (CPM/d) were also computed for the vertical axis and as vector magnitude. CPM/d has been shown to be a valid proxy for total physical activity volume (24 (link)). Total physical activity (minutes/day) was also calculated as mean acceleration counts per minutes >100 during wear time. A mean of approximately 6 (SD = 1.6) valid days (90.2% of sample with ≥4 valid days) of accelerometer data with 14 (SD = 1.3) hours per day of wear time were available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Parkinson's Disease Motor Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The University’s Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures and participants provided informed consent. Participants completed a single session in the lab, whereby each participant completed a demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire followed by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for identifying contraindications for physical activity. Participants underwent a brief examination for scoring the Movement Disorder Society version of the Motor Examination of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale(MDS-UPDRS-III) as a measure of disability and walking status[7 (link)]. Participants were fitted with the ActiGraph GT3X+ monitors, and completed the over-ground walking bout followed by a rest period and the treadmill walking bout. Participants were remunerated $25.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Wearable Accelerometer and Indirect Calorimetry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ActiGraph GT3X+ monitors were mounted on participants’ right wrists. These lightweight accelerometers record accelerations in units of gravity (1 g) in perpendicular, anterior-posterior, and medio-lateral axes. They were configured to collect data at 100 Hz sampling rate. Energy expenditures was measured in parallel using a portable indirect calorimetry system, Cosmed K4b2 [14 (link)]. Respiratory gas exchange data were collected breath-by-breath through a fitted mask. Data were converted to MET values defined as the oxygen uptake (VO2 = ml/min.kg) during steady state rate expressed as a function of 3.5 ml/min.kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Anthropometric Measurements and Wrist-Worn Accelerometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants’ height was measured barefoot to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable stadiometer (Seca Stadiometre, Seca Ltd., Birmingham, UK), and weight was measured barefoot with light clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on electronic scales (Seca Digital Scales, Seca Ltd.). From measured stature and body mass, a BMI z-score was calculated relative to the UK 1990 BMI population reference data.39 (link) Thereafter, all participants wore 1 ActiGraph GT3X+ monitor on their nondominant wrist for 7 days. Verbal confirmation of each participant's nondominant wrist was noted, and device placement was demonstrated. All participants were fitted with their device before leaving the testing session. Before testing, each accelerometer was synchronized with Greenwich Mean Time and initialized to capture data at 80 Hz. Each accelerometer was programmed to commence data collection at 06:00 on the day after participants received the devices. The low-frequency extension was not enabled. Participants were instructed to wear the device at all times (i.e., 24 h/day) for 7 days, except during any water-based activities such as swimming or bathing. Because poor compliance and subsequent selection bias and misclassification is often cited as a limitation of hip-worn accelerometer studies,36 (link) we used the 24-h wear time protocol to encourage compliance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Objective Physical Activity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physical activity level was determined objectively using the Actigraph GT3x monitor (Actigraph, Pensacola, Florida) at the start and by the end of the intervention period. Accelerometers were worn with an elastic belt around the hip for a whole week as previously described [19 (link)]. The monitor had to be worn for at least four days with at least 10 h per day to be included in the data analysis. Total accelerometer counts over registered time (counts per minute, CPM) were calculated and expressed as habitual physical activity level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Accelerometry-Based Physical Activity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Accelerometry data were collected on all children and parents at baseline and 36 months using the ActiGraph GT3X + monitor. Participants were instructed to wear the monitor on the right hip for seven complete days, including during sleeping and water activity (e.g., bathing, swimming, showering). Wear-time criteria were developed by NIH’s Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research Consortium and were 4 days (3 weekdays and 1 weekend day) of at least 6 h of activity 05:00–23:59. Before physical activity variables (including wear time and valid wear days) were derived, a previously validated algorithm was applied to remove nonwear time based on specific patterns of consecutive zero counts (Choi et al., 2011 (link), Choi et al., 2012 (link)). The cut-points that categorized child movement into minutes of SRT and MVPA were based on previously validated algorithms for preschoolers (Butte et al., 2014 (link)). Percentage MVPA or SRT were computed by dividing mean daily minutes of MVPA or SRT by the total mean daily wear time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Accelerometer-based Physical Activity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used an ActiGraph GT3X monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA) to assess the PA. The GT3X is a small and light monitor device that provides activity counts as the outcome measure of PA. Larger counts stand for the higher level of activity. This is a reliable and valid instrument based on previous data from healthy populations.23 (link) The accelerometer monitor was placed on the right hip using an elastic belt for 1 week.24 (link) Caregivers and teachers were asked to record the times that children woke up, wore the ActiGraph on/off and went to bed on a 7-day time sheet. The accelerometery data collected from waking hours were employed to analysis using the ActiLife™ software (ActiGraph). Based on previous studies, the accelerometers were programmed to collect data in 1 min intervals and the output was expressed based on vector magnitude (VM) score as counts per minute (cpm) or overall PA.25 Other variables were provided by dividing the overall PA into 2 categories based on day-time, in-school (08:00–14:00) and after-school (16:00 to bedtime), seeking to examine time–activity patterns. To control for school's finish time, a 2 h gap between 14:00 and 16:00 was considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!