The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using anti mouse antibody

1

Liver Protein Immunoblotting Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver tissues were homogenized and treated with RIPA lysis buffer (1 mM PMSF, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 8 μg/mL leupeptin, and 1.5% Nonidet P-40, and 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4) with phosphatase and protease inhibitors. The samples (30 μg of proteins) were separated in 4–15% polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to PVDF membrane (0.2 mM) by Trans-Blot Turbo (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Nonspecific binding sites on the blots were blocked by incubation in 5% BSA for 1 h, and the membranes were then incubated overnight with primary antibodies and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h. Immune complexes were detected by the ECL chemiluminescence system (Amersham Pharmacia, Little Chalfont, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primary antibodies used were anti-LPS (Abcam) and anti-β-actin antibody (1:20,000; Sigma). The secondary antibodies used were HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (Abcam) and anti-mouse antibodies (Abcam). The chemiluminescent blots were acquired by Chemidoc and analyzed using ImageJ software. The protein expression levels were standardized relative to the level of β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Quantification and Oxidative Stress Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Renal tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mmol/L NaCl,
50 mmol/L Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 10 mg/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride).
Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay. Equal amounts (50 μg
protein/lane) of proteins were loaded onto 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, electrophoresed, and transferred to
polyvinyl difluoride membranes. Membranes were blocked with a 5% nonfat milk for
1 hour and then incubated with antimouse antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge,
Massachusetts) against 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT at 1:1400 dilution),
4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE,1:50), collagen IV (Col IV,1:500), and fibronectin
(FN,1:5000) overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed to remove the unbound
antibodies with Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.2), containing 0.05% Tween 20 3 times
and then incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody. Antigen–antibody
complexes were visualized by electrochemiluminisence, and the resulting image
was analyzed with Bio-Rad Quantity One (Hercules, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metformin's Protein Impact on Breast Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Post‐treatment with different doses of metformin, total protein of MCF‐7 and BT‐474 cells were extracted by using RIPA lysis buffer. The same amount of total protein for each sample was running in SDS‐PAGE gel. The primary antibodies including anti‐HMGA2 and anti‐β‐actin were purchased from GeneTex Inc. (Irvine, USA) and Proteintech (Chicago, USA). The secondary antibodies including goat anti‐rabbit (Abcam, USA) or anti‐mouse antibody (Abcam) were incubated with western blots and the membrane was then visualized by ECL (Millipore). Image J software was used to quantify the intensity in western blotting analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence and Biochemical Analysis of DNA Damage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uninfected normal and E6E7 HPV16 positive 3D cultures were processed by both IF and biochemical analysis.
In vitro cultures slides were ON incubated at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-γH2A.X (clone JBW301, working dilution 1:400, EMD Millipore Corp., USA, distributed by Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and rabbit polyclonal anti-53BP1 (ab36823, working dilution 1:1000, abcam).
For antigens retrieval, all sections were incubated in 1 mM EDTA pH 8 for 50 min at 95 °C. γH2A.X and 53BP1 incubations were respectively followed by the addition of Alexa Fluor 568 and 488 dyes conjugated specific secondary antibodies, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and TSA signal development (Fig. 3A-C, C’, C″).
Protein extracts were then obtained, run, transferred and detected as above described. Membranes were probed with the following primary antibodies: anti-γH2A.X (working dilution 1:1000), anti-53BP1 (working dilution 1:1000) and anti-tubulin as internal control (Fig. 3B). A peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit (working dilution 1:2000, abcam) or anti-mouse antibody (working dilution 1:2000, abcam) incubation was made. Antigens were then revealed as above described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating TAZ Expression in Lung Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed in lung cancer cells with different treatments. After aspirin administration, total proteins were obtained from the different cell groups and the proteins in equal measure from each group were examined. The primary antibodies used in this study, anti‐TAZ or anti‐β‐actin, were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (USA) or Santa Cruz Biotechnology (USA). The secondary antibodies including goat anti‐rabbit (Abcam, USA) or anti‐mouse antibody (Abcam) were incubated with the blots and visualized through an enhanced ECL chemiluminescent substrate kit (Roche, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Vascular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were isolated from whole tissue using radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer as described earlier [22 (link)]. Protein concentration was determined with Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad, USA). 30 μg/µl of protein was loaded on 12% SDS-PAGE gel and electrophoresis was done. Later, proteins were transferred to a nitro cellulose membrane. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by placing the membranes in 5% BSA in TBS for 1 h. Primary antibody was added and incubated at 4°C for overnight with mild shaking. Primary antibodies in this study were used in following dilutions, anti Hey2 antibody (1:500), anti Dll4 antibody (1:1000), anti Ephrin B2 antibody (1:500), anti COUP-TFII antibody (1:800), anti Endoglin antibody (1:1000), anti KLF2 antibody (1:1000), anti GGTP antibody (1:1000) and anti GLUT1 antibody (1:1000). Subsequently, membranes were probed with horse radish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies (Anti-rabbit (1:5000), Abcam, U.K and Anti-mouse antibody (1:5000), Abcam, U.K). Finally, the bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Bio-Rad) and the band was transferred to Kodak X-ray film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BrdU Proliferation Assay in U251 and U87 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BrdU assay was performed according to a previous study [23 (link)]. U251 and U87 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates. After cells reached 80% confluence, the cells were labeled with BrdU (Cat#: ab126556, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 12 h. After washing twice with PBS, the cells were permeabilized and incubated with BrdU antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Then, the cells were incubated with anti-mouse antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 1 h and subjected to a multimode-plate-reader at OD 450 nm (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoblotting Reagents and Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents. Mouse monoclonal anti-Bcl-2, anti-GAPDH, and anti-Hsp90β antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Anti-mouse antibody was purchased from Abcam, Inc. (Cambridge, MA, USA). Mercaptoethanol, iodoacetamide, and HCl were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!