The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistical analysis software

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. SPSS offers a wide range of statistical procedures, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing. The software is designed to be user-friendly and provides a graphical user interface for conducting analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

166 protocols using spss statistical analysis software

1

Comparing HBI Scores: Estimated vs. Reported

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistical analysis software (v. 24 for Windows, 2016, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics, mean (standard deviation) and frequencies, are reported for participant demographic characteristics. Paired-sample t-tests and Pearson’s correlations (r) were used to assess for differences and associations between (1) HBI-Q scores using estimated energy needs vs. reported energy intake, and (2) HBI scores via the HBI-Q vs. dietary recalls. A Bonferroni correction (11 variables) was applied to set the significance level at p ≤ 0.0045. A Bland–Altman analysis was also used to assess the agreement between HBI scores via the HBI-Q vs. dietary recalls. HBI scores were log-transformed due to non-normal data distribution for the Bland–Altman plots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Psychological Interventions Feasibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We conducted all analyses on SPSS statistical analysis software (V.25, IBM).
We calculated the mean recruitment, treatment completion, and retention
rates, mean subscale and total scores of the RCADS, and mean total scores of
the PCSC, SCSC, and IPT-Q at baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow-up,
and 3-month follow-up. We conducted a Wilcoxon Sign-Rank Test to compare
changes in scores between baseline and post-treatment/follow-ups. As a
feasibility pilot, we present 95% confidence interval (CI) estimations
instead of p-values (Lancaster et al., 2004 (link)). We
calculated standardised effect size (Cohen’s d) estimations with the formula
used by G*Power (Faul
et al., 2007
).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistical analysis software and visualised using either R version 3.3.1 (ggplot2, heatmapper). For the enrichment analysis the most significantly altered genes between groups belonging to enriched biological functions were visualised using the “GOPlot” R package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating HTGC Changes in NAFLD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample size was calculated based on change in HTGC from previous data in NAFLD12 (link); an 80% power of detecting a 10% relative difference between group change in liver HTGC with a SD of 9.0 and a 1-sided 0.05 significance required n = 11 per group. We recruited 13 per sample to allow 2 drop-outs per group. Normality was assessed using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and logarithmically transformed if not normally distributed. Between-group differences were evaluated using an unpaired t test and within-group differences using a paired t test (2 way). Treatment × time interactions were assessed using a 2-way analysis of variance. Analyses of covariance were used to test for between-group differences in outcome variables while controlling for baseline values. Bivariate correlations using Pearson rank correlations were conducted to investigate any associations between HTGC, body composition, triglyceride levels, glucose control, biomarkers of inflammation, and NAFLD fibrosis marking systems. Statistical significance was set at a P value of less than .05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical analysis software (version 19; IBM, Chicago, Illinois). All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Analysis of Participant Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participant demographics and symptom profiles were compared to those of the wider hospital (requested via clinical information services), routinely collected national child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) outcome data from the Child Outcomes Research Consortium (CORC) dataset [46 (link)] and data from a national initiative to improve children’s access to evidence-based psychological therapies (CYP IAPT) [23 (link),36 (link),47 ] by running chi-square tests of homogeneity using R statistical software, version 3.6.3 (R Project for Statistical Computing). Post hoc analyses involving pairwise comparisons using multiple z-tests of two proportions with Bonferroni correction was applied where chi-square tests were statistically significant (p < 0.05). As the amount of clustered data was small, with only six families of those allocated to an intervention containing more than one participant, we accounted for clustering by removing those six families from the analysis. All descriptive statistics were undertaken using SPSS statistical analysis software (version 25, IBM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired Student’s t test and the IBM SPSS statistical analysis software (version 23.0). All values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Sample size was determined based on the previous studies with similar experiments (n number noted in the specific figure legends).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of In Vitro and In Vivo Results

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical analysis software (ver. 24.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) with a confidence level of 95% (p < 0.05). The in vitro and in vivo results were analyzed by using the independent student’s t-test to determine the significance of differences between groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fingerprint Similarity Analysis of Berberidis Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fingerprint similarity of Berberidis Cortex was evaluated by Similarity Evaluation System for the chromatographic fingerprint of TCMs (version 2012, Chinese Pharmacopoeia Committee). The standardized fingerprint chromatograms were obtained based on the calibration and normalization of the common peak in ten batches of Berberidis Cortex SIMCA (14.1 Version, Umetrics, Sweden) multivariate statistical analysis software was used for Principal component analysis (PCA) by common peak area in ten batches. Taking the peak area as variables, the clustering analysis (CA) was calculated by SPSS statistical analysis software (21.0 Version, IBM Corp, United States) and GraphPad Prism (6.01 Version) for sample classification. Besides, verification of the accuracy and reliability of QAMS by comparing with ESM was performed to determine the other four active components in samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Screening Novel Variant in Sicilian Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test the frequency of novel c.398delC variant, two groups made up by 300 and 600 subjects, respectively, heterogeneous for age and gender, were collected. The first one was recruited in Fiumedinisi and sampling criteria include Fiumedinisi native ancestors by at least three generations, absence of consanguinity, and absence of inherited disabling ocular diseases. The second group was collected in the Sicilian area: Ionic and Tyrrhenian municipality in province of Messina, like Santa Teresa Riva, Roccalumera, Pace del Mela, were excluded due to their geographic localization, since destinations of the inhabitants of Fiumedinisi who have left their native town. For each population, the c.398delC allele frequency was calculated as [1 × (h + 2H)]/2 N, where h represents the heterozygous genotype, H thehomozygous genotype, and N the sample size for each population. Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was determined using the χ2test with 2 × 3 contingency tables and 1 degree of freedom. Analysis was performed by the IBM SPSS statistical analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Probit Analysis of Insecticide Toxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were repeated three times and performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed with SPSS statistical analysis software (version 22.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) using the probit analysis statistical method. The LC50 values (with 95% confidence limits) were calculated. Differences among the results were considered to be statistically significant when the p value was <0.05. MS Excel 2007 was used to determine the regression equation (Y = mortality; X = concentrations), and the LC50 was derived from the obtained best-fit line. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test and two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test and t test were applied to determine significant differences in teratogenicity, behavior, learning impairment assessment, and gene expression between exposed and control groups. Data are presented as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM), with significant differences relative to the control (p-values ≤ 0.05). GraphPad Prism statistical software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for all graphs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!