The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using piperacillin tazobactam

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of A. baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MIC90 for colistin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, #C4461), polymyxin B (Sigma, #P0972), penicillin (Sigma, #5161), streptomycin (Sigma, #S9137), ampicillin (Sigma, #171254), vancomycin (Sigma, #SBR00001), doxycycline (Sigma, #D1822), cefepime (Sigma, #Y0000633), meropenem (Sandoz, Basel, Switzerland, #0781-3000-94), piperacillin/tazobactam (Sigma, #93129, #T2820), imipenem (Sigma, #I0090000), and levofloxacin (Sigma, #40922) was determined for wza# and wza-Rev. Briefly, A. baumannii strains were grown to OD600 of ~0.4, washed twice with PBS, resuspended at an OD600 of 0.4 (~1 × 108 CFU/mL), and diluted 1:100 in RPMI supplemented with 10% TSB. Antibiotics were serially diluted two-fold from 250 μg/mL to 1.95 μg/mL. Bacteria were added to the diluted antibiotics and grown for 20 h. MIC90 was determined as the concentration at which inhibited 90% or more growth relative to untreated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing for Respiratory Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AST was limited to antibiotics used for the treatment of respiratory infections, which were selected according to the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines [43 (link),44 (link),45 (link)]. Antibiotics were added to TGV medium at respective maximal concentrations that could be achieved at the site of infection according to literature data: amikacin, 9 µg/mL [46 (link)]; azithromycin 8 µg/mL [46 (link),47 (link)]; aztreonam 22 µg/mL [48 (link),49 (link),50 (link)]; cefepime 24 µg/mL [46 (link),49 (link),50 (link)]; gentamicin 5 µg/mL [46 (link),51 (link)]; levofloxacin 12 µg/mL [46 (link),52 (link)]; linezolid 25 µg/mL [53 (link),54 (link)]; meropenem 10 µg/mL [55 (link)]; piperacillin-tazobactam (25 for piperacillin and 3.5 for tazobactam) µg/mL [56 (link)]; vancomycin 12 µg/mL [46 (link),57 (link)] (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Probes were incubated at 37 °C, for 4, 8, and 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the broth microdilution method, following the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations and breakpoints [67 ]. The following antimicrobials (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were tested: ampicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, tigecycline, colistin, polymyxin B, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and chloramphenicol. E. coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Minimal inhibitory concentrations were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute® (CLSI) M07-A10 (CLSI, 2015 ) in 96-well plates. Breakpoints interpretation were made according to the M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing 28th edition (CLSI, 2019 ). Antibiotics included were amikacin (Sigma Aldrich A1774), gentamicin (Sigma Aldrich G3632), aztreonam (Sigma Aldrich PZ0038), ceftazidime (Sigma Aldrich C3809), cefepime (Sigma Aldrich PHR1763), ciprofloxacin (Sigma Aldrich 17850), levofloxacin (Sigma Aldrich 28266), doripenem (Sigma Aldrich 32138), imipenem (Sigma Aldrich I0160), meropenem (Sigma Aldrich M2574), colistin (Sigma Aldrich C4461), and piperacillin/tazobactam (Sigma Aldrich P8396/T2820). P. aeruginosa ATCC® 27853 was used as control as according to CLSI (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic-Resistant P. aeruginosa Clones: Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed with P. aeruginosa UCBPP-PA14 (Rahme et al., 1995 (link)) and clones obtained from four antibiotic-resistant populations: CAR-10, GEN-4, PIT-1 and STR-2 (Barbosa et al., 2017 (link)). The resistant populations were previously selected for high levels of resistance against protein synthesis inhibitors from the aminoglycoside family, gentamicin (GEN; Carl Roth, Germany; Ref. HN09.1) and streptomycin (STR; Sigma-Aldrich, USA; Ref. S6501-5G), or alternatively cell-wall synthesis inhibitors from the β-lactam family, carbenicillin (CAR; Carl Roth, Germany; Ref. 6344.2) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIT; Sigma-Aldrich, USA; Refs. P8396-1G and T2820-10MG). Resistant clones were isolated by streaking the resistant populations on LB agar plates supplemented with antibiotics and picking single colonies after an overnight growth at 37°C. Antibiotic stocks were prepared according to manufacturer instructions and frozen in aliquots for single use. Evolution experiments and resistance measurements were performed in liquid M9 minimal media supplemented with glucose (2 g/l), citrate (0.5 g/l) and casamino acids (1 g/l).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antimicrobial agents were determined by using the agar dilution method16 . The tested compounds included ampicillin, aztreonam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, colistin sulfate (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) and tigecycline (Wyeth, Puerto Rico).
According to the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Standing Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (Version 14.0, 2015), the susceptible MIC breakpoint for colistin against Enterobacteriaceae is ≦2 μg/mL and it is considered resistant if MIC > 2 μg/mL. The breakpoints for tigecycline against Enterobacteriaceae are ≦1μ g/mL as susceptible and >2 μg/mL as resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pseudomonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of various antibiotics including gentamicin, amikacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem and meropenem (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) against P. aeruginosa was determined. Innoculum was prepared by adjusting the overnight culture to 0.5 McFarland's standard. The MIC assay was performed at a concentration of each antibiotics ranging from 0.03 µg/mL to 256 µg/mL by micro broth dilution method; using Muller-Hinton Broth (MHB, HiMedia, India) as described in Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI, 2015) guidelines. Briefly, 10 µL of culture was inoculated into MHB containing different concentration of antibiotics and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The MIC was determined visually by the highest concentration showing the absence of growth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of ESBL E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The E. coli isolates were considered potential carrier of ESBL enzyme when they showed resistance to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. The MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of fourteen antibiotics including ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, cefepime, cefixime, gentamicin, amikacin, meropenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, colistin, and piperacillin/tazobactam (Sigma Chemical Co., Germany) for resistant E. coli strains was determined by the agar dilution method [3 ]. The MIC was determined on Mueller Hinton agar with twofold dilutions of antibiotics concentration (from 0.5 μg/mL to 256 μg/mL and 10 μL of microbial suspension). Microbial growth was observed and documented after 24 hours of incubation at 35°C. The result was reported according to CLSI 2011 guidelines and divided into three categories: resistant, intermediate, and susceptible. The ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were considered resistant to both cefotaxime and ceftazidime if their MIC was ≥2 μg/mL in accordance with CLSI criteria [17 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Salmonella Serotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Salmonella isolates were serotyped via the slide agglutination assay according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer of the Salmonella antisera (Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark). The serovars of the isolates were determined using the Kauffmann-White scheme (Grimont and Weill, 2007 ).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella isolates was performed using the agar dilution method for ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefuroxime, cefotetan, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, aztreonam, imipenem, amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, United States). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain in each run. The breakpoints for determining susceptibility or resistance to antimicrobials were determined by the guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI, 2018 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Preparation and Dilution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aztreonam, meropenem, and polymyxin B were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals. Cefepime was purchased from Kemimac(s) Pte Ltd. Piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Doripenem was obtained from Shionogi and Co. Aliquots of stock solutions of all antibiotics were prepared in sterile water and stored at −80°C. Before each experiment, the aliquots were thawed and diluted to the desired concentrations with cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (Ca-MHB).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!