The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tracefinder

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

TraceFinder is a software platform designed for analytical laboratories. It provides a comprehensive workflow solution for data acquisition, processing, and reporting of analytical data from various laboratory instrumentation. TraceFinder's core function is to efficiently manage and streamline the analysis of samples, enabling laboratories to improve their productivity and regulatory compliance.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

70 protocols using tracefinder

1

Proteinogenic Amino Acid Isotopolog Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The incorporation of 13C-label into proteinogenic amino acids (listed in Supplementary data 6) was analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, using an Ultimate 3000 HPLC system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to an LTQ Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a heated electrospray ionization probe described in detail by Heuillet et al., 2018 [44 (link)]. Full scan HRMS analyses were performed in positive FTMS mode at a resolution of 60,000 (at 400 m/z), using the following source parameters: Capillary temperature, 275 °C; source heater temperature, 250 °C; sheath gas flow rate, 45 a.u. (arbitrary unit); auxiliary gas flow rate, 20 a.u.; S-Lens RF level, 40%; source voltage, 5 kV. Metabolites were identified by extracting the exact mass with a tolerance of 5 ppm. The raw MS isotopic profiles of proteinogenic amino acids were then quantified using Tracefinder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The isotopic profiles (Carbon Isotopologue Distributions) were obtained after correcting for natural isotopic abundances using IsoCor 1.2 [27 (link),28 (link)] (https://github.com/MetaSys-LISBP/IsoCor (accessed on 20 May 2020)). The raw MS data are available from Metabolights (accession number MTBLS2188).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolite Extraction and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolite extraction and analysis was performed as previously described10 (link), 29 (link). Briefly, cells were washed with PBS once and extracted with ice-cold extraction solvent (Acetonitrile/MeOH/ H2O (30/50/20)), shaken for 5 min at 4 °C, transferred into eppendorf tubes and centrifuged for 5 min at 18k G. The supernatant was transferred in LC-MS glass vials and kept at −80 °C until measurement. Formate extraction and derivatization was performed as described in10 (link) using a Methylchloroformate derivatization approach. Derivatized formate was analyzed using GC-MS (Agilent). Heavy labeled M + 2 formate was used as internal standard for quantification.
LC-MS analysis was performed as described previously10 (link) using HILIC chromatography and a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Raw data analysis was performed using TraceFinder (Thermo Fisher Scientific) software. Peak areas were normalized to cell volume in case of in vitro experiments, or to wet weight (mg) tissue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiomics Data Integration Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following software and algorithms were used in this report: In-gel/in-blot fluorescence scanning and normalization; Image Lab software (Bio-Rad). MS1 and MS2 file conversion; RawConverter (RawConverter). MS data protein search algorithm; ProLuCID (Integrated Proteomics Applications – IP2). MS data lipid search algorithm; LipidSearch (Thermo Fisher Scientific). MS data acquisition; Xcalibur (Thermo Fisher Scientific). MS data protein analysis; Skyline-daily (MacCoss Lab Software). MS data lipid analysis; TraceFinder (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Super-resolution microscopy image analysis – Fiji (ImageJ). Confocal microscopy image analysis – CZI (Zeiss). Sequence alignment software; Clustal Omega (EMBL-EBI). Statistical analysis calculation; Prism (GraphPad). Hierarchical clustering analysis; R (RStudio).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chemical Profiling of Piper longum Linn

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characterization chemical ingredients of P. longum Linn were carried out as described previously study [23 (link),24 (link)]. Dionex UltiMate 3000 system (LabX, Midland, ON, Canada) with a Thermo Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (UHPLC-MS/MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used for analysis. All tested compounds were separated using an Acquity BEH C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) with water and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid. The mass spectra of P. longum Linn analyzed using a heated electrospray ionization source. The full scan mass spectra were acquired in positive ion mode at a scan range of 100–1500 m/z in data-dependent MS2 scan mode. Data acquisition and analysis were based on Xcalibur and TraceFinder software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The reference standards, magnoflorine and piperine, were purchased from Targetmol (Wellesley Hills, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasma Metabolite Quantification by GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human plasma samples were thawed on ice, and 100 ul were extracted with 900 ul of cold extraction buffer containing 40:40:20 methanol:acetonitrile:water [v:v:v]. After 30 min in an orbital mixer at 4°C, samples were sonicated for 10 min in an ice-cooled bath-type sonicator and centrifuged for 10 min at 16000xg at 4°C. Supernatants were collected and dried in a SpeedVac until complete dryness. Standard curves of Nam were prepared with concentrations ranging from .005 to 50 ug/ml (expected limit of detection .1–.5 ng/ml). Standards were processed in the same way as samples. Dried down samples and standards were derivatized using methoxyamine and MSTFA/FAMEs solution (N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoracetamid/Fatty acid methyl esters) following standard procedures (Lisec et al., 2006 (link); Caldana et al., 2013 (link)). After that, samples were analyzed in a GC-EI-MS (Q Exactive GC Orbitrap system, ThermoFisher) using a 30-m DB-35M capillary column. Representative fragments from the GC-EI-MS analysis of Nam were extracted using TraceFinder (Version 4.1, ThermoFischer) and quantified using the linear range of the obtained standard curve. All analysis were performed using peak areas, transformed into Z-scores, for easier comparison among experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Ebastine in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (0.5 x 106) treated with 15 μM ebastine were suspended in 500 μl distilled H2O and total protein concentration was measured using Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit. Aliquots of 20 μl were extracted using 200 μl of acetonitrile (ACN), adding 8 μl of internal standard (1 μM terfenadine) for the quantitation. Samples were shaken for 10min at 4°C using an Eppendorf ThermoMixer C (Eppendorf Instrument GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) followed by centrifugation at 10000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C for protein precipitation. Supernatant was transferred into a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and the solvent was evaporated. Sample were resuspended in the adequate solvent for the liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) starting conditions. The quantitation was performed using a (U) HPLC UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano System interfaced on-line to quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer Q-Exactive (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a Triart C18 reverse phase column 150 x 0.5, 1/16”, 5 μm particle size (YMC CO., LTD, Japan).
Parallel reaction monitoring for the specific fragments 167.0858 (ebastine) and 436.3002 (terfenadine) was used for the quantitation of ebastine. The data analysis was performed using TraceFinder (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Prism GraphPad. All solvents for the extraction were HPLC grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ginsenoside Identification via MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TraceFinder (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used for extracting peaks based on the ginsenosides database. The strategies for confirming non-reference ginsenosides are shown in Figure 1. The filter used selected the peaks that met the following conditions for further processing: precursor mass within a 5-ppm mass tolerance window, a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) threshold larger than 20, isotopic confirmation used, and a scan number of each peak greater than 8. The negative MS/MS spectra obtained from the deprotonated molecular [M-H] ions were used to confirm the ginsenosides according to MS/MS (fragment ion) information from reference standards and literatures. Components of different samples appeared the same when they showed similar retention times with a tolerance of 0.15 min, accurate mass weights with a tolerance of 0.05 Da, and ion fragments. Peak integration was calculated automatically and supplemented manually.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intracellular Metabolite Extraction and LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initially, 3 × 106 cells were pelleted (300g for 2 min at room temperature) and the medium aspired followed by immediate addition of 1.5 mL ice-cold 80% MeOH and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were subsequently thawed on ice, vortexed for 30 s before being snap-frozen again and the procedure repeated for a total of three cycles. Finally, any undissolved fractions were pelleted (12,000g for 10 min at 0 °C) and the supernatant dried under a light flow of N2 before the samples were resuspended in 30 μL 50% acetonitrile (pH 9) and diluted two times in 10 mM ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile (pH 9). Analysis of the intracellular metabolites was performed by MS-Omics. Overall, the LC–MS method was modified from Hsiao et al.42 (link) using a Thermo Scientific Vanquish LC coupled to a Thermo Q Exactive HF MS with a heated electrospray ionization interface operated in negative and positive ionization mode. For the untargeted analysis peak areas were extracted using Compound Discoverer (vers: 3.0.0.294, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), while the targeted analysis was conducted using TraceFinder (vers 4.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UPLC-Orbitrap Metabolic Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polar substance extraction and analysis were performed as previously described (56 (link)) with some modifications: cell extracts were mixed with a precooled (−20°C) homogeneous methanol:methyl-tertbutyl-ether (TMBE), 1:3 (v/v) mixture. The tubes were sonicated for 30 minutes in an ice-cold sonication bath. Then, UPLC grade water:methanol (3:1, v/v) solution (0.5 mL) containing internal standards (a mixture of 13C- and 15N-labeled amino acids, from Sigma) was added to the tubes, followed by centrifugation. Then, the polar phase was reextracted. Finally, samples were lyophilized and the pellets were dissolved using 0.15 mL water:methanol (1:1), and centrifuged twice prior to loading onto the LC/MS system. Metabolic profiling was performed using Acquity I class UPLC System combined with a mass spectrometer (Thermo Exactive Plus Orbitrap). LC separation was performed using a SeQuant Zic-pHilic column with the SeQuant guard column. The mobile phases used were 20 mmol/L ammonium carbonate with 0.1% ammonium hydroxide in water:acetonitrile (80:20, v/v; mobile phase A) and acetonitrile as mobile phase B. The flow rate was kept at 0.2 mL per minute and the following gradient: 0–2 minutes 75% of B, 14 minutes 25% of B, 18 minutes 25% of B, 19 minutes 75% of B, for 4 minutes. For data processing, we used TraceFinder (Thermo Fisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Non-targeted Screening of Chemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatographic data
was processed by peak detection, retention time alignment, and peak
integration followed by isotope ratio filtering. This resulted in
a processed dataset with peak areas from extracted ions at specific
retention times corresponding to different compounds. Data processing
was done in Tracefinder (version 4.1, Thermo Scientific, MA, U.S.)
using the analysis mode for unknown screening, which enables nontargeted
screening of data. Peak picking was done with the deconvolution plugin
(version 1.3, Thermo Scientific, MA, U.S.). The retention time alignment
window was set to 10 s, the accurate mass tolerance to 10 ppm, the
signal-to-noise (s/n) threshold to 5, the total ion-chromatogram intensity
threshold to 500,000, the ion overlap window to 90–99%, and
the response threshold to 10,000.
The extracted peaks were automatically
time-aligned and integrated in the unknown screening view using the
Avalon detection algorithm and the nearest RT detection method with
seven smoothing points. Data representing compounds present in blank
samples were manually removed from each crude HD dataset. The datasets
for spiked soil and textile samples were processed and manually merged
after removing peaks found in blank samples. The variation in the
spiked matrix data was higher than in the crude HD data, so the m/z deviation threshold was increased to
0.01 to permit merging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!