The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

225 protocols using dna purification kit

1

DNA Labeling and Enrichment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hME-Seal was described previously18 (link). Briefly, genomic DNA was first sonicated to 100–500 bp and mixed with 100 ml solution containing 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.9), 25 mM MgCl2, 250 mM UDP-6-N3-Glu, and 2.25 mM wild-type β-glucosyltransferase. Reactions were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. DNA substrates were purified via Qiagen DNA purification kit. 150 mM dibenzocyclooctyne modified biotin was then added to the purified DNA, and the labeling reaction was performed for 2 h at 37 °C. The biotin-labelled DNA was enriched by Streptavidin-coupled Dynabeads (Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin T1, Life Technologies) and purified by Qiagen DNA purification kit for library preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Improved 5hmC Enrichment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5hmC enrichment was performed as previously described with an improved selective chemical labeling method (Song et al., 2011 (link)). 5hmC labeling reactions were performed in a 100 μL solution containing 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.9), 25 mM MgCl2, 300 ng/μL sonicated genomic DNA (100–500 bp), 250 μM UDP-6-N3-Glu, and 2.25 μM wild-type β-GT. Reactions were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. DNA substrates were purified via Qiagen DNA purification kit or by phenol-chloroform precipitation and reconstituted in H2O. Click chemistry was performed with the addition of 150 μM dibenzocyclooctyne modified biotin into the DNA solution and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Samples were purified by Pierce Monomeric Avidin Kit (Thermo) following manufacturer’s recommendations. After elution, biotin-5-N3-gmC-containing DNA was concentrated by 10K Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL Centrifugal Filters (Millipore) and purified by Qiagen DNA purification kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative 5-hmC Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 5-hmC labelling reactions were performed in a 20-μl solution containing 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.9), 25 mM MgCl2, 3 μg sonicated genomic DNA (100–500 bp), 100 μM UDP-6-N3- Glc, and 1 μM β-GT. The reactions were incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. After the reaction, the DNA substrates were purified with DNA purification kit (Qiagen) and eluted in H2O. The click chemistry was performed with addition of 150 μM dibenzocyclooctyne modified biotin into the DNA solution, and the reaction mixture was incubated for 2 hours at 37 °C. The DNA samples were then purified by DNA purification kit (Qiagen). 600 ng labeled genomic DNA sample was spotted on an Amersham Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare). DNA was fixed to the membrane by Stratagene UV Stratalinker 2400 (auto-crosslink). The membrane was then blocked with 5% BSA and incubated with Avidin-HRP (1:40,000) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), which was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. Quantification was calculated using a working curve generated by 1–8 ng of 32 bp synthetic biotin-5-N3-gmC-containing DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Whole Genome Sequencing of bla(NDM)-positive A. baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from all blaNDM-positive A. baumannii isolates using QIAGEN DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). This was further manipulated by Nextera DNA Sample Preparation kit (Nextera, United States) for preparation of the DNA library according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Sequencing was performed using the paired end 2×150bp reads sequencing technology on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States). Reads quality was assessed using FastQC v0.11.9 (Brown et al., 2017 (link)) before trimming with Trimmomatic v0.35 to cut away remaining adaptors and low-quality reads (Bolger et al., 2014 (link)). Trimmed reads were de novo assembled using SPAdes 3.14.1 (Bankevich et al., 2012 (link)) with default parameters. The quality of genomes assembly was evaluated using QUAST v5.0.2 (Gurevich et al., 2013 (link)). Functional annotations of the draft genomes were generated during submission to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome database using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP; Tatusova et al., 2016 (link)). Plasmid sequences were identified using plasmidSPAdes (Antipov et al., 2016 (link)) and Unicycler (Wick et al., 2017 (link)) for raw reads assembly and Bandage (Wick et al., 2015 (link)) for visualization of circular contigs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Recombinant DNA Manipulations and Molecular Biology Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recombinant DNA manipulations were conducted according to standard procedures [24 ] and the recommendations of the enzyme manufacturer (Thermo Scientific). Plasmid and chromosomal DNA were isolated using the Qiagen Miniprep kit (Qiagen) and the Qiagen DNA purification kit (Qiagen), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Transformation of B. subtilis competent cells, PCR amplifications and DNA sequence analyses were performed as previously described [17 (link)]. Primers were purchased from Evrogen (Moscow, Russia). All constructions involving a PCR step were verified by DNA sequencing. Chromosomal deletion of yutF was confirmed by PCR (S1 Fig) and DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Plasmid Construction by Gibson Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids were constructed by Gibson Assembly for which primers were designed using NEBuilder (https://nebuilder.neb.com/#!/). DNA was amplified from WT genomic DNA by PCR using Advantage 2 Polymerase (#639202, Takara Bio, USA). Plasmid backbones were double digested with the necessary restriction enzymes and purified using the Qiagen DNA purification kit (#28704 × 4, QIAGEN GmbH, Germany). DNA inserts were cloned into the digested vectors using the NEBuilder Hifi DNA Assembly Mastermix (#E2621L, New England Biolabs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping of Spinocerebellar Ataxias

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples were extracted from peripheral leukocyte by phenol-chloroform method or using QIAGEN DNA purification kit (QIAGEN, CA, USA). Fluorescently-labelled PCR of the expanded repeat alleles of the ATXN1 (ataxin 1), ATXN2, ATXN3, CACNA1A (alpha 1A subunit, P/Q type voltage-dependent calcium channel: SCA6), ATXN7 and ATN1 (atrophin 1: DRPLA) genes were performed by using primer sets as previously described methods [9 (link),11 (link),25 (link)-28 (link)]. The allele sizes were then determined by running the PCR products on Beckman CEQ8800 DNA Analysis System (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). Sizes of CAG repeat of both normal and pathological alleles of each chromosome were calculated by comparing results with the size of a normal control sample, of which the sizes were prior defined by direct sequencing. In order to avoid a false negative result caused by a very large expanded allele failing to be amplified by using regular PCR [29 (link)]. all samples whose results showed patterns of homozygous wild-type alleles of ATXN1, ATXN2 and ATXN3, were subsequently re-analyzed by performing long-range PCR using LA Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Chiba, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples of all participants were collected and stored at −80°C until use. Genomic DNA was extracted from the whole blood using a commercial kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Patients’ DNA was purified by Qiagen DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genotyping was identified by MassArray method (Sequenom, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole Genome Sequencing and Plasmid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After DNA extraction using the QIAGEN DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and library preparation using the Nextera DNA Sample Preparation kit (Nextera, USA), WGS was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Pre-assembly processing of the generated reads was carried out by FastQC (Andrews, 2010 ) for quality assessment and Trimmomatic v0.32 (Bolger et al., 2014 (link)) for the trimming of low-quality reads. De novo assembly of trimmed reads was carried out using SPAdes 3.14.1 (Bankevich et al., 2012 (link)). Post-assembly metrics were generated by QUAST v5.0.2 (Gurevich et al., 2013 (link)). Draft genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (Tatusova et al., 2016 (link)). Plasmids were assembled from Illumina reads using PlasmidSPAdes (Antipov et al., 2016 (link)), a software for reading coverage-assisted plasmid identification. Assembly graphs (Fastg files) generated by PlasmidSPAdes were visualized on a bandage (Wick et al., 2015 (link)). Plasmid sequences were extracted from circular contigs or groups of contigs forming circular paths containing plasmid replication and/or mobilization genes. Contigs forming circular but overlapping paths were BLASTed for closest plasmids that were subsequently used for reference mapping using the short reads mapping tool BWA-MEM (Li and Durbin, 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bacterial Genome Sequencing and Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using a Qiagen DNA purification kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and the quality of the extracted DNA was evaluated using a Nanodrop™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, United States) (Zheng et al., 2014 (link)). Then the genomic DNA was sent to Novogene (Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for WGS using Illumina HiSeq 4,000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) combined with the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform (Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom) (Xiaoliang et al., 2019 (link)). The sequencing process was up to 48 h long, and raw fast 5 files were generated using the MinKNOW software (Vijayakumar et al., 2020 (link)). De novo assembly was performed using Unicycler (Wick et al., 2017 (link)) and SPAdes genome assembler (Prjibelski et al., 2020 (link)). Finally, a complete and accurate genome assembly was generated by Pilon (Walker et al., 2014 (link)), and the quality, completeness and contiguity of it were verified using QUAST (Gurevich et al., 2013 (link)). The whole-genome sequence of DY1928 was deposited in GenBank1 under the following accession numbers: CP090429 for the chromosome and CP090430 for the plasmid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!