The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

107 protocols using cyanine3 (cy3)

1

Microreactor Leakage Detection using Cy3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To check for leakage from the microreactors sealed with PSA tape, Cy3 (Q13108, GE Healthcare, IL, USA) was dissolved in buffer 1 (1 M 3-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid, 4 mM MgCl 2 , pH 7.0) to prepare a 1.8 μM Cy3 solution. This solution was sealed in the microreactors using 145RN packaging tape, and confocal microscopy (A1R, Nikon, Japan) was used for imaging and photobleaching of the reactors. The imaging interval after photobleaching was 10 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lectin Array Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lectin array analysis was performed as previously described (20 (link)). In brief, 35 kinds of commercially available lectins from the Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA) and the Sigma-Aldrich were immobilized onto a microplate. The total membrane proteins (2 mg) from HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues were labeled with fluorescent dye Cy3 (GE Healthcare; Buckinghamshire, UK) and about 10–15 μg protein was spotted for each individual spot on the lectin microplate. The Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) at 570 nm was determined on a SpectraMax® i3x microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA), and average backgrounds were removed. The lectin microarray data were normalized, and the fold change was evaluated by comparison of the data from HCC tissues with adjacent non-tumor tissues and then analyzed by using GraphPad Prism 9.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lectin Microarray Profiling of Cystic Fluid Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lectin microarrays were constructed and analysed by 37 commercial lectins from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA), Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Cystic fluid protein samples were labelled with the fluorescent dye Cy3 (GE Healthcare; Buckinghamshire, UK) and were applied to the lectin microarrays. The slides were incubated in a humidity-controlled incubator at 50% humidity overnight to allow lectin immobilization. After incubation, the slides were blocked with blocking buffer (50 mM ethanolamine, 2% (w/v) BSA and 500 mM glycine in 50 mM sodium borate buffer, pH 8) for one hour and were then rinsed three times with PBST (0.05% Tween 20 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4). This was followed by a final rinse in PBS (0.1 M phosphate buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4). Before use, the slides were dried by centrifugation at 600 rpm for 5 minutes. After incubation, the slides were scanned with a GenePix 4000B confocal scanner (Axon Instruments; Union City, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplexed RNA FISH with Cyclic Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We designed oligonucleotide probe sets using the Stellaris probe designer (Biosearch Technologies) and ordered them with an amine group on the 3′ end (sequences available in Supplementary Data 3). We pooled the oligonucleotides for each probe set and coupled them to either Cy3 (GE Healthcare), Alexa 594 (Life Technologies), Atto647N or Atto 700 (Atto-Tec). We performed RNA FISH as previously described30 (link) for each of the cycles of hybridization. We first fixed cells with formaldehyde and permeabilized with 70% ethanol. We next washed once with wash buffer (containing 10% formamide and 2X SSC) and then applied hybridization buffer (containing 10% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, and 2X SSC) with the specified pool of RNA FISH probes. We hybridized for 6–12 hours and then washed 2 times for 30 minutes with wash buffer.
After imaging, we applied 60% formamide with 2X SSC for 15 minutes on a heat plate kept at 37℃. We then washed the sample 3 times with 1X PBS for 15 minutes also at 37℃ to remove residual formamide, which we have found can inhibit further hybridizations. Lastly, we washed once with wash buffer to remove residual 1X PBS and prepare the samples for another RNA FISH hybridization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiplexed RNA FISH with Cyclic Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We designed oligonucleotide probe sets using the Stellaris probe designer (Biosearch Technologies) and ordered them with an amine group on the 3′ end (sequences available in Supplementary Data 3). We pooled the oligonucleotides for each probe set and coupled them to either Cy3 (GE Healthcare), Alexa 594 (Life Technologies), Atto647N or Atto 700 (Atto-Tec). We performed RNA FISH as previously described30 (link) for each of the cycles of hybridization. We first fixed cells with formaldehyde and permeabilized with 70% ethanol. We next washed once with wash buffer (containing 10% formamide and 2X SSC) and then applied hybridization buffer (containing 10% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, and 2X SSC) with the specified pool of RNA FISH probes. We hybridized for 6–12 hours and then washed 2 times for 30 minutes with wash buffer.
After imaging, we applied 60% formamide with 2X SSC for 15 minutes on a heat plate kept at 37℃. We then washed the sample 3 times with 1X PBS for 15 minutes also at 37℃ to remove residual formamide, which we have found can inhibit further hybridizations. Lastly, we washed once with wash buffer to remove residual 1X PBS and prepare the samples for another RNA FISH hybridization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Proteomics via 2D-DIGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-dimensional DIGE was performed at Applied Biomics (Hayward, CA, USA) following typical methods [19 ,20 (link)]. Briefly, cell lysates, were denatured by equal volume addition of lysis buffer containing 7M urea, 2M thio urea, 4% 3-((3-cholamidopropyl)dimethyl ammonio)-1-propanesulfonate(CHAPS) followed by addition of 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, at a 5:1 volume ratio lysis buffer: plasma. Lysate samples were normalized using total protein as determined by Lowry protein estimation method. Next, samples were labeled with CyDye DIGE fluors developed for fluorescence 2D-DIGE technology (Cy3 and Cy5, GE Healthcare, CT, USA) and incubated in dark on ice, 30 min. The labeled samples were then subjected to isoelectric focusing (IEF) on a 13-cm precast non-linear immobilized pH gradient strip (pH 3-10, Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) using an Amersham Pharmacia IPGPHOR unit with a power supply (EPS3501XL) in gradient mode. Next, the samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE) in the second dimension based on size. The gels were scanned using Typhoon Trioscanner (Amersham Biosciences) and fluorescent dye signals corresponding to individual samples converted to black and white images for analysis using Image Quant and DeCyder software (Amersham Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasma Protein Analysis in HF and HDF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma samples from HF and HDF patients (15 μg of protein) were separated and analysed by denaturating sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of 12% acrylamide (3% cross-linking). Low molecular weight calibration kit (GE Healthcare) for SDS-PAGE was used as molecular mass standards.
In DIGE experiments, plasma samples from HF and HDF patients (5 μg of protein) were labelled with Cy3 or Cy5 fluorescent dyes (GE Healthcare) according to the standard protocol for DIGE assay, as previously described21 (link). Labelling was performed in samples from HF and HDF patients (n = 9 per group) in a paired combination. A sample of HF (patient 1) was randomly discarded and the labelling was alternated between Cy3 and Cy5 in each group. After fluorescence labelling, HF and HDF samples were combined and analysed by SDS-PAGE as described above. In the Cy-labelled experiments for subsequent MALDI-TOF MS identification pools (n = 5) of both HF and HDF patients’ plasma samples were combined. A detailed protocol is included in the Supplementary Material.
Coomassie brilliant blue (R-250, BioRad) was used to stain the proteins in gels, that after were washed-out with 20% ethanol/7% acetic acid (vol/vol). Finally, gels were preserved in 10% ethanol until scanning and protein quantification, or extraction for subsequent identification by MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescent Labeling and FRET Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MFN1IM(C156S + A696C), MFN2IM(C390S + A706C), and related mutants were labeled with fivefold concentration of fluorescent dye Cy3 or Cy5 (GE Healthcare) for 60 min at 4 °C in a buffer containing (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). Free dye was removed by gel filtration chromatography using a Superdex 200 10/30 column. Cy3 was excited at 537 nm, with peak emission at 570 nm. Cy5 fluorescence emission was detected at 667 nm. Cy3- and Cy5-labeled proteins (1 μΜ each) were mixed in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 2% β-ME as previously described33 (link). Fluorescence was measured once every 1 min in a flat black 96-well plate for 40 min, then 2 mM indicated nucleotide was added and the measurement continued for another 60 min. FRET traces were calculated as: FRET = ICy5/(ICy3 + ICy5), where ICy3 and ICy5 are the instantaneous Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescence intensities, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptomic Analysis of Malaria Gametocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA microarrays (60-mer, Agilent Technologies, USA) based on the full P. falciparum genome as previously described [96 (link)] were used to assess global transcriptomic changes in gametocytes treated with JIB-04. Day 2 and day 3 gametocyte cultures (1–3% gametocytaemia, 4% haematocrit) were treated with 5 µM JIB-04 (Cayman Chemicals) for 24 h followed by isolation of gametocytes using 0.01% (w/v) saponin. Total RNA was isolated with a combination of TRIzol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and phenol–chloroform extraction and subsequently used to synthesise cDNA as previously described [96 (link)] for the untreated and JIB-04 treated day 2 and day 3 gametocyte samples. Sample cDNA was labelled with Cy5 dye (GE Healthcare, USA) prior to hybridisation to arrays with an equal amount (350–500 ng) of Cy3-labelled (GE Healthcare, USA) reference pool containing equal amounts of cDNA from each gametocyte sample and mixed stage 3D7 asexual parasites. After hybridisation, the slides were scanned on a G2600D (Agilent Technologies, USA) scanner and normalised signal intensities for each oligo were extracted using the GE2_1100_Jul11_no_spikein protocol and Agilent Feature Extractor Software (v 11.5.1.1) as described before [96 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

PBMC Proteomics Using Fluorescent Cyanine Dyes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMC protein samples were labeled with fluorescent cyanine (Cy) dyes (GE Healthcare, Singapore). Six FRDA patients and age- and gender-matched healthy controls were selected for proteomics analysis (six biological replicates). The internal standard was prepared by combining equal amounts of each of the 12 samples. Prior to fluorescent dye labeling, the pH of each sample was adjusted to around 8. For each sample, 50 μg of proteins was labeled with 200 pmol of either Cy3 or Cy5, using minimal labeling method (GE Healthcare). Dye swapping was done to ensure no biasing of Cy dyes for any protein sample. Internal standard was labeled with 200 pmol of the Cy2 fluorophore in each experimental set (Table 1). The labeling was performed in the dark and on ice for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 10 mM lysine and the samples were stored on ice for 15 min. Afterward, the Cy2, Cy3, and Cy5 sample were pooled in a single tube.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!