The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tissuefaxs imaging system

Manufactured by TissueGnostics
Sourced in Austria, United States

The TissueFAXS imaging system is a high-performance microscopy platform designed for the acquisition and analysis of digital images of tissue samples. It provides a comprehensive solution for capturing, processing, and managing digital images of tissue sections.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using tissuefaxs imaging system

1

Multiparametric Immunofluorescence Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of sections, antigen retrieval and blocking was performed as described previously [12 (link)]. Sections were incubated overnight with rabbit-anti human CD103 mAb, washed and incubated with Envision-HRP anti-rabbit followed by fluorophore tyramide amplification diluents (TSA KIT Perkin Elmer, MA, USA 1:50) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Next, slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti-human CD8 (DAKO, Heverlee, Belgium, clone C8/144B, 1:25 in blocking buffer) and rabbit anti-human pSMAD2/3 (D27F4, Cell signaling, 1:50 in blocking buffer). Sections were subsequently incubated with goat-anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA GαM-AF555, 1:150) and goat-anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA 1:150). Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Sections were embedded in prolong Gold anti-fade mounting medium (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA) and scanned using a TissueFaxs imaging system (TissueGnostics, Vienna, Austria). Processed channels were merged using Adobe Photoshop. Analysis was performed using Fiji [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following de-paraffinization, antigen retrieval and blocking of peroxidase activity, whole slides were stained overnight at 4°C with primary antibody against TIA-1 (1:50, ab2712, Abcam). Sections were subsequently incubated with anti-mouse Envision+ reagent (K4000, DAKO) for 30 minutes and HRP visualized using cyanine 5 tyramide signal amplification (TSA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PerkinElmer). Next, whole slides were stained overnight with primary antibody against CD8 (1:25, clone C8/144B, DAKO) and a biotinylated antibody against fibronectin (1:50, ab6584, Abcam). Slides were incubated with GaM-AF555 (1:150 Life Technologies) and streptavidin-dylight488 (1:150, Thermo Scientific), counterstained with DAPI (Life Technologies) and mounted in prolong gold mounting medium (Life Technologies). Immunofluorescent slides were scanned using a TissueFaxs imaging system (TissueGnostics, Austria). Processed channels were merged using Adobe Photoshop CS5 (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Immunostained Skin Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stained skin tissue sections were acquired using the TissueFAXS imaging system (TissueGnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria) on an Axio Observer Z1 microscope equipped with an LD Plan-Neofluar 20 × /0.4 objective (Zeiss). Data from the acquired photos were processed with TissueQuest image analysis software 6.0 and StrataQuest (TissueGnostics GmbH). Matched isotype controls were included for analysis of background staining. Biopsy specimens were read in a blinded fashion by an independent investigator who was not involved in the collection or staining of the tissue sections. The epidermis and dermis were analyzed separately. In each biopsy, an area of 5 mm2 of the upper dermis and the epidermis (at a length of 5 mm basement membrane) was tagged. Labeled cells within the tagged area were expressed as the number of cells/mm2. Additionally, the percentage and the absolute numbers of labeled cells within the selected area were also gathered. Only cells clearly positive for the antigen were counted. Artifacts, blood vessels and adnexa were excluded from the areas of interest.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry Analysis of Periodontal Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mIHC was performed using an Opal 7-plex fIHC kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA)). Human gingival tissue Sect. (4 μm) from healthy individuals and patients with periodontitis were labeled with primary antibodies against CD68, CD86 CD206, PGRN, and TNFR2, followed by secondary antibodies. The antibodies were listed in Table 1 (in Supporting Information). Subsequently, the fluorophore-conjugated tyramide amplification system (PerkinElmer) was used for signal amplification, and DAPI was used to counterstain the nuclei. Slides were scanned using the TissueFAXS imaging system (TissueGnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Tissue Imaging Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed materials and methods are provided in supplementary material, Supplementary materials and methods, including immunofluorescence for murine lesions with CD31 staining, immunohistochemistry for human endometrial tissues and murine lesions with Ki‐67, and active caspase‐3 staining. Images of the stained tissue were captured by the TissueFAXS imaging system (TissueGnostics, Tarzana, CA, USA) and were then processed using TissueQuest for immunofluorescence and HistoQuest for immunohistochemistry (TissueGnostics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CD206, IL-32, and DAPI Immune Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For CD206/IL-32/DAPI triple staining, slides were stained with rabbit anti-human CD206 (Servicebio, GB11062, China) and mouse anti-human IL-32 (BioLegend, 513501, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sections were scanned by a TissueFAXS imaging system (Tissue Gnostics, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Osteogenic Mineralization of hMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were employed for detection and quantification of mineralisation occurred at 14 and 28 days after culturing hMSCs in the presence and absence of osteogenic factors on different surfaces. The cells were washed gently with PBS then fixed for 20 min with 4% PFA. After washing with distilled water and carefully removing the entire liquid, the samples were incubated with Alizarin Red S solution (ARS) (40 mM, pH 4.1–4.3) at room temperature for 10 min, repeatedly washed with PBS and microscopically visualised using a TissueFAXS imaging system (Tissue Gnostics, Vienna, Austria). For quantification, Alizarin red staining was extracted for 15 min at room temperature using a solution of 20% methanol and 10% acetic acid in water. Subsequently, the liquid was transferred to 96-well plates and the absorbance read at 450 nm using a Mithras LB940 Berthold spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying FGL1 expression in tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarray for FGL1 IHC staining was obtained from the tissue bank at Urology Department of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. The standard protocols were followed as previously described (23 (link)). Slides were scanned using Axio Image Z2 Microscope (Zeiss) and TissueFAXS imaging system (TissueGnostics GmbH, Austria). All images were analyzed by TissueQuest and StrataQuest software (TissueGnostics GmbH, Austria). As previously described (24 (link)), staining intensity was scored as follows: 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong), whereas the staining range was scored as: 0 (0%), 1 (1%–24%), 2 (25%–49%), and 3 (50%–100%). The IHC staining score was obtained by multiplying the intensity scores with staining range. The IHC staining score ranged from 0 to 9. Scores less than two were considered as negative staining, 2–3 indicated weak staining, 4–6 was moderate staining, and >6 was strong staining. Patients with an IHC staining score ≥4 were included in the high expression group, whereas those with an IHC staining score <4 were included in the low expression group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tube Formation Assay for CTEPH Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tube formation assays were performed based on experiments described previously [26 (link)]. Each well of a pre-cooled 48-well plate was briefly coated with 150 μL Matrigel matrix (Corning, Tewksbury, MA, USA) and allowed to polymerize for 5 minutes at room temperature followed by 30 minutes at 37°C. Primary HPAECs or CTEPH-EC isolated from CTEPH patients (3 x 104 cells per well) were seeded to the coated plate and incubated for 5h30min in EGM-2 alone or EGM-2 containing 50μM VER-155008 in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% of CO2. Five images were obtained from each well using TissueFAXS imaging system (TissueGnostics, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescent Staining and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were cultured in Lab-Tek 8-chambered coverglass slides (Thermo Scientific, #155409). After treatment, cells were washed in warm PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) plus 4% sucrose in PBS for 15 min. Cells were then incubated with PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 2 min and then blocked in 5% BSA in PBS for 1 hour at RT. After blocking, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated Phalloidin (1:500) and Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated Deoxyribonuclease I (1:500) diluted in 1% BSA in PBS for 1 hour at RT. Finally, cells were washed in ddH2O and mounted with ProLong® Gold antifade. Sections were imaged using the TissueFAXS imaging system (TissueGnostics).
Mean fluorescence intensity of phalloidin and DNAse I stainings were digitally analysed with ImageJ. Following a 300 px background subtraction, images were thresholded and the integrated density per area from the appropriate channel was calculated, using the perimeter of the cell boundary. For each data set, each replicate represents the mean of eight analysed cells. Values are expressed as arbitrary units (a.u.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!