The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using axs d2 phaser

1

XRPD Analysis of Posaconazole API Polymorphism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For identification of the polymorphism of the Posaconazole API in oral suspensions, an X-ray Powder Diffractometer (Bruker AXS D2 Phaser 2nd Gen, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used, equipped with a standard Bragg Brentano geometry with fixed primary and linear LYNXEYE (1D mode) detector. Ceramic X-ray tube KFL Cu-2K, 0.4 mm × 12 mm, with a Ka spectral line (λ = 1.54184 Å) was used as the incident radiation. The tube worked with 300 W (30 kV voltage and 10 mA current). The scan mode was continuous, and a locked coupled scan type was used. The step size was 0.02° (2θ), the scan speed varied while the region of 2–40° (2θ) was scanned. No rotation was applied for recording the XRPD patterns. A 0.6-mm primary divergence slit, a 3-mm air scatter screen, an 8-mm anti-scatter slit, a 2.5° soler slit and a 5° (2θ) opening for the Position Sensitive Detector (PSD), were used. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) XRPD sample holders with a 25-mm diameter and a 0.5-mm-deep circular cavity for spreading the sample were used. The background of the XRPD patterns was subtracted using the software DIFFRAC.SUITE EVA V4.1.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Thermal and Structural Analysis of CA-HPβCD Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal analysis of prepared samples was carried out with DSC apparatus TA Instruments DSC Q20, with the heating speed at 10 °C/min in the range 30–180 °C. The FT-IR spectra of systems, as well as pure substances constituting a given system along with their physical mixtures, were recorded with FT-IR Bruker IFS 66v/S with DTGS detector. The samples were put in KBr pills in a 1:100 ratio by applying 8 metric tonnes of pressure in a hydraulic press. The ATR spectra were obtained with ATR BRUKER VERTEX 70 with a DLaTGS detector directly on powder. The vibrational infrared spectra were measured between 400 and 4000 cm−1. The identification of the CA–HPβCD system was carried out via X-ray powder diffraction (PXRD). The XRD patterns of the samples were recorded on a Bruker AXS D2 Phaser diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å). The operating voltage and current were maintained at 30 kV and 10 mA, respectively. The samples were scanned from 5 to 45° 2θ. Selected higher-quality scans were made with a step size of 0.02°, with a counting rate of 2 s/step with the sample spinning. A 1 mm slit module was used during measurements. The acquired data were analyzed using the Origin Pro software [25 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Crystalline Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystalline phase of each sample was analyzed by powder X-ray diffractometry (XRD, Bruker AXS D2 Phaser, Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The powder sample mounted on poly (methyl methacrylate) holder was scanned from 5 to 80° (2θ) with 0.1 mm equatorial slit and 1.0 mm air scattering slit. For measurement of hydrodynamic radius of materials, aqueous suspension of each sample (1 mg/ml) was subjected to dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument (ELSZ-1000, Otsuka, Japan). The particle size and morphology of powder samples were examined with field emission-scanning electron microscope (SEM; Quanta 250 FEG, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Each powder was loaded on carbon tape and coated with Pt/Pd for 60 s before SEM measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Analysis via X-ray Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) experiments were performed with a Bruker AXS D2 Phaser diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å). The operating voltage and current were maintained at 30 kV and 10 mA, respectively. The samples were scanned from 20° to 85° 2θ. Selected higher-quality scans were made with a step size of 0.02°, with a counting rate of 2 s/step with the sample spinning. A 1 mm slit module was used during measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphologies of the samples were observed with a S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). The distribution of elements on the samples was determined by EDS Mapping. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were carried out using a Bruker AXS D2 PHASER, Germany. Keyence VK-X150 laser microscope was used to record the 3D surface topography of samples. A universal UTM2203 tensile testing machine (Sun Technology Co., Ltd.) was used for mechanical tests. Water permeability tests were carried out using the W3-060 Water Vapor Transmission Rate Test System (30, 35, and 40 °C, 80 RH%). Water contact angles were recorded by a video optical contact angle meter (OCA15EC). UV analyses were carried out using an ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2700), Japan. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was performed with a Thermofisher Nicolet iS50 FTIR. Electromagnetic shielding properties were studied utilizing a Keysight N5234B PNA-L Network Analyzer using a 2-port network analyzer in the range of 8.2–12.4 GHz (X-band). Electrophysiological signals of human were collected with a commercial biosignal collection kit (Plux Wireless Biosignals).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Determination of Cellulose Crystallite Size via XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed using “Bruker AXS D2 Phaser”. The X-ray generator was equipped with a Cu tube operating at 30 kV and 10 mA and irradiating the sample with a monochromatic CuKα radiation with a wavelength of 1.54 Å. XRD spectra were acquired at room temperature over the 2θ range of 5°–50° with sampling at 0.03° increments and with a measurement time of 1 s per 2θ intervals. The average crystallite size was calculated from the Scherrer equation (Eq. 1), by using the diffraction pattern obtained from the 002 lattice planes of cellulose. D=57.3kλ/βcosθ where: D is the mean diameter of crystal, k is the crystal shape factor (0.94), λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.54 Å), β is the FWHM (full width at half maximum) of peak diffraction corresponding to the crystallographic plane 002, and θ is the Bragg angle corresponding to the (002) plane. A factor of 57.3 was applied in the equation in order to convert β from degrees to radians.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Bioactive Glass Nanorods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of BG nanorods was visualized using a Zeiss Leo 1540XB SEM (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at 5 mm working distance and 3 kV of electron beam voltage. The specimens were coated with Osmium in an Osmium Plasma Coater (OPC80T, Filgen Inc., Nagoya, Japan). Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) instrument attached to the SEM was used for elemental analysis. XRD was performed using an X-ray diffractometer AXS D2 PHASER (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) operating on CuKα radiation with λ = 1.5418Å. The measurements were conducted in 30 kV and 10 mA in 2θ range 10–60° with steps of 0.049°. For FTIR analysis, BG nanorods were ground in a planetary ball mill to get a fine powder. FTIR spectra of this powder were obtained using a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a resolution of 4 cm−1 with a sample scan of 32 to identify specific functional groups. All spectra were analyzed using OMNIC series software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KBr pellets were used to examine the FTIR spectra with a SHIMADZU FTIR-8400s spectrophotometer. A Bruker AXS D2 PHASER was employed to record XRD patterns with Cu Kα radiation. A NETZSCH STA 449F3 system was used to conduct TGA studies under air, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min up to 800 °C. SEM with a JSM-6701F system and TEM with a Tecnai F20 system equipped with EDX were used to analyze the morphologies and elemental distributions of the photocatalysts. A Micrometrics ASAP-2460 Surface Area and Porosimetry Analyzer was used to measure the BET-specific surface areas. A Thermo Fisher ESCALAB 250Xi system was used to obtain the XPS data. The PL spectra were obtained at room temperature with a Hitachi F-4700 spectrophotometer with an excitation wavelength of 350 nm. A CS310H electrochemical workstation was used to assess the electrochemical performance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analytical Characterization of Graphene Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photoluminescence properties were measured using a Horiba FluoroMax®-4 spectrofluorometer, which allows for the correction of inhomogeneities in the instrument and detector response as well as differing lamp intensity, and absorbance spectra were taken with an Agilent Cary 4000 spectrophotometer. Thus, the fluorescence intensities are quantitavely comparable. AFM measurements were performed using the tapping mode of a Veeco 3100 with SiO2 as substrate. XPS data were measured using a PHI 5000 Versaprobe II XPS microprobe instrument with Au as substrate and TEM images were taken with the Titan G3 50-300 PICO48 on ultra thin amorphous carbon TEM grids. Raman spectra were obtained on a Bruker MultiRAM-FT Raman spectrometer equipped with a ND:YAG-laser (excitation wavelength 1064 nm). GQDs were measured in water dispersion in a mirrored cuvette with a laser power of 950 mW for 5000 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1. Water reference spectra were obtained using the same settings. Solid-state spectra of citric acid were collected at 75 mW for 2500 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The diethylenetriamine reference Raman spectrum was measured in an NMR tube at 400 mW for 2500 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1. PXRD patterns were recorded on a Bruker AXS D2 Phaser using Cu-Kα1/α2 radiation with λ = 1.5418 Å at 30 kV. Elemental analyses were conducted with a PerkinElmer CHN 2400 Analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The grinded catalyst was placed inside a quartz-glass sample holder and flattened before each testing. X-ray diffraction was carried out on a Bruker AXS D2 PHASER, using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). The diffraction patterns were collected from 10 to 90° with a step of 0.02°. The 2θ angles were calibrated with a micrometer-scale alumina disc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!