The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using improm iitm reverse transcription system kit

1

Modulation of Glucose Transporters in Caco-2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Caco-2 cells were incubated with serum and glucose-free DMEM for 2 h and subsequent incubation with the LS extract (125–250 µg/mL) in serum-free medium for 16 h (Alzaid et al. 2013 (link)). Then, total RNA from Caco-2 cells was extracted using RiboZol reagent (Solon, OH, USA) and the cDNA was synthesized using an ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, VIC, Australia) based on the manufacturer’s instructions. SGLT1, GLUT2 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression were analyzed by CFX96TM Real-Time PCR (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, USA) using SsoFastTM EvaGreen® Supermix kit. Thermocycling conditions were set at an annealing temperature of 59.5 °C at 40 PCR cycles for GAPDH and at an annealing temperature of 56.4 °C for 60 PCR cycles for SGLT1 and GLUT2. Quantitative measurements of glucose transporter relative to GAPDH gene expression were derived using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The data were expressed as the relative to untreated control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gene Expression Analysis by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Residual DNA was removed by Deoxyribonuclease I (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK). The quality of extracted RNA was evaluated in a 2% agarose gel. RNA 2 µg were retro-transcribed into cDNA using the ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) was performed as described previously [55 (link)] and carried out using Green GoTaq q-PCR Master Mix (Promega). Primers (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for c-MYC, NANOG, SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, β-actin, and GAPDH are described in Supplementary Table S1 (see electronic supplementary material [ESM]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on 6‐ or 12‐well plates for at least 24 h before detaching them and centrifuging at 336.47 g to obtain pellets for RNA extraction using RNeasy Micro kit (Quiagen, 74004) according to manufacturer's instructions. RNA purity and yield were assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Retro‐transcription to cDNA was performed with the ImProm‐IITM Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, A3800) following manufacturer's instructions; a minimum of 50 ng of RNA per reaction was used. qRT‐PCRs were performed with the SYBR‐Green Real Time Master Mix (Promega; A600A) according to manufacturer's instructions using a BioRad CFX96 machine. qRT‐PCRs were performed in triplicate on samples from at least three independent experiments. Ct data were normalised to GAPDH (Stern‐Straeter et al, 2009 (link)). Data were presented as mean ± SEM of the fold change. Significance was assessed on the delta Ct values using Student's two‐tailed t‐test. List of primers used are available in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Total RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from P. major muscles using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. DNA was removed by incubating the isolated RNA with DNase I (Thermo Scientific, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Total RNA samples were subsequently purified using a GeneJet RNA Cleanup and Concentration Micro kit (Thermo Scientific, Inc.). Total RNA concentration and quality were quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (model 2000, Thermo Scientific, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA), and its integrity was further determined using an agarose gel electrophoresis. Total RNA was then proceeded to cDNA synthesis using an oligo(dT) as a primer and an ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). The amount of the synthesized cDNA was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Extraction and qPCR Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for RNA extraction and qPCR analysis were taken every day at the same time from two bioreactors for a period of 5 days. Volumes of 20 ml were sampled and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 3 min. The pellet was washed in 0.9% RNAse-free NaCl and frozen in liquid nitrogen. It was thereafter stored at -80°C until extraction. RNA was extracted from the pellets as described previously (Collart and Oliviero, 1993 (link)). RNA was DNAse treated with added RiboLock RNAse Inhibitor according to protocol provided by Promega (Fitchburg, Wisconsin). Total RNA was quantified using a NanodropTM 1000 Spectrophotometer, and the integrity of total RNA was checked on a 1.2% agarose gel both before and after DNAse treatment. RNA was of a good quality and was found to be free of genomic DNA. RNA (200 ng) was reverse transcribed to cDNA using PCR techniques according to directions supplied by the Promega ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System kit (Fitchburg, Wisconsin).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Total RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was extracted from 50 mg of the larvae, testes, or ovaries using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and subsequently treated with RNase-free DNase I (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of the total RNA using an ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot with Protein Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RbCl was obtained from Chem-Impex (#07221, Illinois, Wood Dale, IL, USA). TCA (#BP555), ECL kit (#34096), Trizol reagent (#15596026), 100X Halt™ phosphatase inhibitor Cocktail (#78420), RIPA buffer (#89900) were from Thermofisher Scientific (Massachusetts, Waltham, MA, USA). NaCl (#194848) and KCl (#194844) was obtained from MP Biomedicals (Ohio, Solon, OH, USA). Mannitol was from AppliChem (#142067.1210, Darmstadt, Germany). HEPES was obtained from Flow Laboratories (#15-884-15, California, Hyland Ave Costa Mesa, CA, USA). MgCl2 was purchased from Honeywell (#63020, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA). Nonidet P-40 was obtained from Helicon (Am-E109, Moscow, Russia). Secondary anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibodies (#AP132P) were obtained from Millipore (California, Temecula, CA, USA). Quick-RNA MicroPrep microkit columns was obtained from Zymo Research (#R1051, California, Irvine, CA, USA). The ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System kit was obtained from Promega, (#A3800, Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA). QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit was obtained from Qiagen (#28704, Maryland, Germantown, MD, USA). Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals were of the purest grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying CTSZ gene expression in blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from total blood was extracted using Trizol LS (GE Healthcare, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA was submitted to reverse transcription using the ImProm-II (TM) Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, USA). CTSZ and housekeeping genes were amplified using 2 µL of cDNA of each sample previously diluted 1:15, 5 µL of Power SYBR Green Master Mix (2X) (Thermo Scientific, USA), and 1.5 µL of primers sense and antisense (6 µM). The samples were amplified in the Applied Biosystems® 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, USA) for 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, followed by 60 s at 60°C. The following primer sequences were used: CTSZ sense: 5′ CATCCCTGACGAGACCTG 3′, CTSZ antisense: 5′ GCATGTCCCACATTGGTTAAA 3′; ribosomal protein 13a (RPL13a) sense: 5′ CCACCCTGGAGGAGA 3′ and RPL13A antisense: 5′ CCTGTTTCCGTAGCCTCAT 3′. All experiments were performed in triplicate for each sample. CTSZ mRNA expression was firstly normalized by the housekeeping gene RPL13a (2-ΔCt) and then corrected by the CTSZ mRNA expression from the healthy control group (2-ΔCt). RPL13a was previously used to correct CTSZ expression from the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fungal Genomic DNA Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two methods were used for fungal genomic DNA isolation based on two different purposes. A quick and easy genomic DNA extraction method was used for PCR-based screening of transformants (Chi et al., 2009 ). Genomic DNA was isolated from mycelia according to a standard protocol for southern hybridization (Sambrook and Russell, 2001 ). Southern DNA hybridization was performed with the selected transformants to ensure correct gene replacement events and absence of ectopic integration. Genomic DNA was digested with BamHI, PstI, XhoI and NheI, and blots were probed with 1-kb 5′-flanking or 3′-flanking sequences (Fig. S1). Southern DNA hybridization was performed using a standard method (Sambrook and Russell, 2001 ). To perform expression analysis using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), cDNA synthesis was performed with 5 μg of total RNA using the oligo dT primer with the ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer pairs used in this study were listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Expression Analysis of ddx4 and dnd1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of the total RNA extracted from the gills, heart, intestine, kidney, liver, muscle, skin, and stomach using the ImPromIITM Reverse Transcription System Kit (Promega). Two pairs of gene-specific primers were designed to determine the expression levels of ddx4 (Tpe-ddx4F2 and Tpe-ddx4R3) and dnd1 (Tpe-dndF1 and Tpe-dndR4). The beta actin gene (actb) served as an internal control, and a pair of primers (β-actinF and β-actinR; Table 1) was used. Reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis was performed in a total volume of 10 µL consisting of 1 µL of cDNA template, 1 µL of dNTP mix (2.5 mM each), 10 pmol of each primer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 5X GoTaq Flexi buffer, and 0.25 U GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega). The RT-PCR analysis was performed with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 reaction cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. The final elongation step was carried out at 72 °C for 5 min. The plasmids p3-ddx4, pdnd, and pActin, which contain partial cDNA of actb [39 (link)], were used as positive controls to determine ddx4, dnd1, and actb. The PCR products of ddx4, dnd1, and actb were verified using agarose gel electrophoresis and RedSafe™ Nucleic Acid Staining (JH Science, iNtRON Biotechnology, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!