The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lsm 510 or 710

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Canada

The LSM 510 and LSM 710 are high-performance laser scanning microscopes manufactured by Zeiss. These instruments are designed for advanced imaging applications, providing researchers with the tools to capture high-quality, detailed images of samples. The core function of these products is to enable confocal laser scanning microscopy, allowing for non-invasive, three-dimensional imaging of samples with exceptional resolution and contrast.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using lsm 510 or 710

1

Histological Analysis of Differentiated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentiated cell clusters or islets were fixed with 4% PFA for 1 hr at room temperature (RT), washed, embedded in Histogel (Thermo), and sectioned for histological analysis. Before staining, paraffin was removed from sections using Histoclear (Thermoscientific), rehydrated, and underwent antigen retrieval by treatment with 0.1M EDTA (Ambion) in pressure cooker (Proteogenix) for 2 hr. For staining, slides were blocked with PBS+0.1% Triton X-100 (VWR)+5% donkey serum (Jackson Immunoresearch) for 1 hr at RT, incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, washed, incubated with secondary antibody incubation for 2 hr at RT, and washed. For imaging, samples were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories), covered with coverslips, and sealed with nail polish. Representative images were taken using an Olympus IX51 Microscope or Zeiss LSM 510 or 710 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Drosophila Immunofluorescence Ciliary Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Drosophila immunofluorescence analyses were performed exactly as previously described [36 (link)]. For detection of mSmo in the primary cilium, Smo-/- cells stably transfected with vector control, mSmoWT or mSmoNQ4 plasmids were incubated overnight in culture media supplemented with 0.5% FCS plus SAG (100 nM). The following morning cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature followed by three 10 minute washes in 1xPBS. Fixed cells were permeabilized and blocked in PBGT (1xPBS+0.1% TritonX-100+5% Normal goat serum) for 1 hour, then incubated overnight with anti-Smo (SCBT) and anti- γ-tubulin (Sigma) antibodies. AlexaFluor 488 or 555 conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000; Life technologies) were used. Slides were mounted using Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Labs). Immunofluorescence data were collected using Zeiss LSM 510 or 710 and images were processed using Zen2009 and Photoshop CS6. For all immunofluorescence experiments, multiple cells were examined over a minimum of three experiments, and representative images are shown. For quantification of ciliary localization, 96–126 cells were counted over three experiments and the percent of cells showing Smo in the primary cilium was determined. The paired t-test was used to determine statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Neural Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free-floating sections were incubated (overnight, room temperature) with rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:1000, Leica, Cedarlane, Burlington, ON, Canada) or goat anti-doublecortin (DCX, 1:1000, Santa Cruz), then incubated in biotinylated species-specific secondary antibodies and the Avidin-Biotin complex (ABC kit, Vector laboratory). The immunoreactive material was detected in 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, brown precipitate). Immunoflurorescence staining with rabbit anti-calbindin (1:10000, Swant, Switzerland), anti-β-catenin (1:100, Santa Cruz), anti-Prox1 (1:3000, Millipore, Temecula, CA), or goat anti-DKK-1 (1:60, R&D system, Minneapolis) was detected with species-specific cyanin-3 (Cy3) or Alexa 594 (red) conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson Labs, West Grove, PA, USA). Sections (minimum 2-3/mouse) were observed under light microscopy or epifluorescence on a Leitz Aristoplan microscope (Leica, Montréal, QC, Canada), or confocal microscopy (LSM 510 or 710, Zeiss), digital pictures were taken and used for analysis. Staining specificity was confirmed by omitting primary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-Resolution Imaging of Dissociated Retinal Cones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For dissociated cones, z-stacks were acquired with a CCD camera
immediately before electrophysiological recording, stepping the
objective in 1-μm increments. Cones recorded in the retina were
imaged live or after fixation. Confocal z-stacks (steps of 0.4–1
μm, optical sections of 0.8–1.5 μm; Zeiss LSM 510
or 710) were acquired with a 40× water-immersion objective (1.0
NA, Zeiss) in live or fixed tissue. Imaging was generally performed
through the ganglion cell layer to avoid light scatter by photoreceptor
outer segments. Retinal position and Alexa fluorescence were used to
track individual cones from electrophysiological recording to imaging.
Comparing cones live and after fixation indicates that there is
negligible distortion of morphology by the latter. Cone dimensions were
consistent with expectations from prior examinations by electron and
light microscopy (Curcio et al.,
1990
; Drasdo et al.,
2007
; Hsu et al.,
1998
; Perry and Cowey,
1988
)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In vivo DAT-1::GFP Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vivo imaging of DAT-1::GFP was performed as previously described [20 (link)]. Briefly, transgenic animals were placed on a freshly prepared 2% agarose pads and immobilized using 225 mM 2,3 butanedione monoxime (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2.5 mM levamisole (Sigma-Aldrich) in 10 mM HEPES. A Z-stack of images was obtained using a Zeiss LSM 510 or 710 in the Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Core. By setting the gain of confocal illumination of synaptic regions just below the maximal gain of the microscope, we obtain the relative intensity of signal from cell soma and dendritic regions within the same animal. For quantification, imaging stacks obtained containing cell body, dendrites and synaptic regions were thresholded, and pseudo-colored using Metamorph (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Pixel densities were calculated after selecting the area of interest and then obtaining the average fluorescence intensity, with these values used to calculate the ratio of fluorescence in the synapse or dendrite relative to the cell body in the same animal. A minimum of ten animals per genotype was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!