The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Plasmid extraction kit

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States

The Plasmid Extraction Kit is a laboratory product designed to isolate and purify plasmid DNA from bacterial cultures. It provides a reliable method for extracting plasmid DNA from samples, which can be used for various downstream applications, such as cloning, sequencing, or transfection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using plasmid extraction kit

1

Validation of miR-133a-RAC1 Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The binding site of miR-133a and RAC1 was predicted using bioinformatics software and a website, http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71/. PC12 cells were lysed with TRIzol, and 5 μL of the cell lysate was mixed with firefly luciferase buffer and 5 μL of the substrate to measure the fluorescence intensity. Then, the luciferase activity of Renilla luciferase was measured by mixing the cell lysate with the Renilla luciferase buffer and 5 μL of enterococcin substrate. The psiCHECK-2 vector was used to analyze the firefly luciferase activity as an internal reference, and the expression of psiCHECK2-RAC1-3′UTR wild type (WT) served as the control. The targeting relationship and binding site between miR-133a and RAC1 were then predicted. The RAC1 3′UTR sequence containing the binding site for miR-133a was synthesized and RAC1 3′UTR WT plasmid (RAC1-WT) and mutant plasmid (RAC1-MUT) were constructed as per the Plasmid Extraction Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). RAC1-WT and RAC1-MUT plasmids were mixed with mimic NC and miR-133a mimic, respectively, and co-transfected into PC12 cells. Luciferase activity was determined using a luciferase detection kit (BioVision, San Francisco, CA, USA) and a Glomax 20/20 luminometer (Promega).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cloning and Expression of LEPA-HIS Fusion Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For lepa over-expression, the CDS sequence of lepa was cloned into the constructed pTol2-actin-egfp plasmid (the promoter was β-actin from zebrafish) to produce pTol2-actin-lepa-egfp. Due to the lack of a specific lepa antibody, we also introduced the His-tag before the lepa termination codon to produce the LEPA-HIS fusion protein. In this way, we could use commercial HIS antibodies to detect LEPA protein expression for convenience. The expression plasmids then were transferred into E. coli DH-5α competent cells, plated on culture dish containing 100 μg⋅mL–1 kanamycin (Sangon, Shanghai, China) and cultured in a 37°C incubator for 12 h before analysis via individual bacterial colony PCR. The positive clones obtained via sequencing underwent expansion culturing, and plasmids were extracted using a plasmid extraction kit (Promega, Wisconsin, United States) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −20°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating miR-218 Regulation of MITF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bioinformatics website (http://www.targetscan.org) was adopted to predict the targeting relationship between miR-218 and MITF and binding sites of miR-218 to MITF. MITF 3′untranslated region (UTR) promoter sequence containing miR-218 binding sites were synthesized. MITF-3′UTR-wild type (WT) plasmid was constructed. According to this plasmid, binding sites were mutated to construct MITF-3′UTR-mutant type (MUT) plasmid based on the instructions of plasmid extraction kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Cells at logarithmic growth phase were inoculated in the 96-well plate. When cell confluence reached 70%, transfection was performed based on the instructions of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). MITF-3′UTR-WT and MITF-3′UTR-MUT plasmids were mixed with miR-218 mimics and mimics NC were co-transfected into the 293T cells. The miR-218 mimics and mimics NC were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). After transfection of 48 h, cells were harvested and lysed. The luciferase activity was determined by using a dual-luciferase reporter gene assay kit (BioVision, San Francisco, CA, USA). The experiment was conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Apoptosis Pathway Monitoring Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal antibodies against Bcl-2, Bax, P53, P21, Mcl-1, and GAPDH were purchased from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibodies against CytC, Fas, FasL, and TRAIL were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Mouse anti-γ-H2AX antibody was from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). DMEM medium and FBS were purchased from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY, USA). FITC annexin V Apopotosis Detection Kit was from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA). Caspase-Glo 3/7, 8, and 9 assay kits and Plasmid extraction kit were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) and Reactive Oxygen Species Assay Kit were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). LipofectamineTM 2000, Dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), MitoSOXTM Red, MitoTracker Deep Red FM, MitoTracker Green FM and Hoechst 33342 were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Trypan Blue Staining Cell Viability Assay Kit was from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Jiangsu, China). Tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) was from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Z-LEHD-FMK, Z-IETD-FMK, Z-DEVD-FMK were from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Colorimetric TUNEL Apoptosis Assay Kit was from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Mitochondria/Cytosol Fractionation Kit was from BioVision (San Francisco, CA, USA). DL-2000 DNA Marker was from TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bacterial Plasmid Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial plasmids were extracted using a Promega Plasmid Extraction Kit (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI, USA). The plasmids were digested with HindIII restriction endonuclease and subjected to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel, using a HindIII restriction enzyme digested λ DNA as the standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

miR-103a Regulation of BDNF Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bioinformatics software (http://www.targetscan.org) was used to predict the targeting relationship between miR-103a and BDNF and the binding sites between miR-103a and BDNF 3′UTR. The sequence of BDNF 3′UTR promoter containing miR-103a binding site was synthesized, and the BDNF 3′UTR wild-type (WT) plasmid was constructed. On the basis of this plasmid, the BDNF 3′UTR mutant (MUT) plasmid was constructed at the mutation binding site. According to the methods of the plasmid extraction kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin USA), the cells in the logarithmic growth were inoculated into 96-well plates and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 at about 70% cell confluence. BDNF-WT and BDNF-MUT were mixed with mimics NC and miR-103a mimics (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China)) respectively, and then co-transfected into 293T cells. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were collected and lysed. The luciferase activity was detected by luciferase detection kit (BioVision, San Francisco, CA, USA) and Glomax 20/20 luminometer (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin USA). The experiment was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Validating miR-27a Binding to SFRP1 3'UTR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bioinformatics software (http://www.targetscan.org) was used to predict the targeting relationship between miR-27a and SFRP1 and the binding sites between miR-27a and SFRP1 3′UTR. The sequence of SFRP1 3′UTR promoter containing miR-27a binding site was synthesized, and the SFRP1 3′UTR wild-type (WT) plasmid was constructed. On the basis of this plasmid, the SFRP1 3′UTR mutant (MUT) plasmid was constructed at the mutation binding site. According to the methods of the plasmid extraction kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin USA), the cells in the logarithmic growth were inoculated into 96-well plates and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 at the cell density of about 70%. The plasmids of SFRP1-3′UTR-WT and SFRP1-3′UTR-MUT were mixed with mimics NC and miR-27a mimics (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China), respectively, and then co-transfected into 293T cells. The cells were collected and lysed after 48 h of transfection. The luciferase activity was detected by luciferase detection kit (BioVision, San Francisco, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Validation of miR-92a Binding to TCF21

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bioinformatics software http://www.targetscan.org was used to predict the targeting relationship between miR-92a and TCF21 and the binding sites of miR-92a to TCF21 3′UTR. TCF21 3′UTR promoter sequence containing miR-92a binding site was synthesized and TCF21 3′UTR wild type plasmid (TCF21-WT) was constructed. On the basis of this plasmid, the mutant type plasmid TCF21 3′UTR (TCF21-MUT) was constructed. The procedure was carried out according to the instructions of plasmid extraction kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The cells in the logarithmic growth were inoculated into the 96-well plate and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 when the cell density was about 70%. TCF21-WT and TCF21-MUT were mixed with mimics NC and miR-92a mimics (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China)) respectively, and then co-transfected into 293T cells. After 48 h of transfection, luciferase activity was collected and lysed. The luciferase activity was detected by a Glomax20/20 luminometer (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) with a luciferase detection kit (BioVision, San Francisco, CA, USA). The experiment was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Investigating miR-26a-5p and its Regulatory Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bioinformatics software (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/panGeneDiffExp.php) was used to predict the target relationship between miR-26a-5p and SNHG6 as well as the binding site. The SNHG6 sequence containing the binding site of miR-26a-5p was synthesized and inserted into the pMIR-REPORTTM Luciferase vector (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) to construct the SNHG6 wild-type plasmid (SNHG6-WT). In this plasmid, the binding site was mutated to construct the SNHG6 mutant plasmid (SNHG6-MUT). Plasmid extraction was carried out according to the instructions of the plasmid extraction kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). SNHG6-WT and SNHG6-MUT were mixed with mimic NC and miR-26a-5p mimic (Shanghai GenePharma Biological Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), respectively, followed by co-transfection into 293T cells, which were obtained from ATCC, using LipofectamineTM 2000. Luciferase activity was measured by a luciferase detection kit and a GloMax 20/20luminometer (Promega). As described above, the target relationship between miR-26a-5p and FUBP1 as well as the binding site was predicted by http://www.targetscan.org, and the plasmids FUBP1-WT and FUBP1-MUT were constructed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

AMP Expression in Lactococcus lactis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ORFs of the AMPs (Table S1), codon-optimized for Lactococcus lactis, were cloned into the pTKR plasmid (Fig. S1), an L. lactis/E. coli shuttle vector developed in the Kearney Lab from the L. lactis plasmid, pT1NX (38 (link)) by adding an E. coli ori site and kanR gene for propagation and selection of E. coli clones. This plasmid includes the P1 acid-inducible promoter and the usp45 signal peptide for transport out of the cell. The ORFs were amplified from a gBlock (IDT) by PCR (1 minute melting at 95°C; 35 cycles of 15 seconds melting at 95°C, 15 seconds annealing at Tm + 3°C, 30 seconds extension at 72°C; and 5 minutes elongation at 72°C) using respective primers and pasted into the pTKR plasmid using restriction enzyme cutsites post agarose gel purification. The recombinant plasmid was electroporated into E. coli 10β cells and plated out on LB agar (Thermo Scientific) plate with kanamycin (MP Biomedicals) to pick successfully cloned colonies. Post-colony-PCR screening, cloned colonies were picked and propagated in LB liquid media with kanamycin (25 µg/mL; Thermo Scientific). The pTKR plamids with AMPs cloned were extracted from the pelleted liquid culture using the Plasmid Extraction Kit (Promega) and electroporated into L. lactis MG1363 (LMBP 3019) cells, followed by erythromycin selection on GM17 plates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!