The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using discovery xt platform

1

Detecting NICD1 in GBM Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded GBM tissue on a Discovery XT platform (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ) using Ventana’s reagents, unless otherwise noted. Six µm-thick sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through graded alcohols. Heat induced antigen retrieval was performed in a BioCare Decloaking Chamber in Tris-EDTA buffer for 20 minutes at 120°C and 17 PSI and incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 4 min. NICD1 antibody (1:100, Abcam, ab8925) was incubated for 3 hours and detected using anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase multimer (OmniMap). Immune complexes were visualized with 3,3’-diaminobenzidene (DAB) and enhanced with copper sulfate (ChromoMap). Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted with permanent media.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Phospho-RIPK3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After collection, embryos and placentas were immersion-fixed in formalin and transferred to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before tissue processing. Tissues were then dehydrated in 70% ethanol followed by Flex 95 (Richard-Allan Scientific) and Flex 100 solutions, cleared in xylene, and routinely infiltrated and embedded in paraffin. Embryos and placentas were embedded in separate blocks.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were stained with rabbit anti-mouse phospho-RIPK3 antibody (5 μg/ml; GEN135–35-9, Genentech) recognizing phosphorylated residues Thr231, as previously described (18 (link)). Immunohistochemistry was performed on the Ventana Discovery XT platform with Cell Conditioning 1 standard antigen retrieval. The reaction was detected with the HQ amplification system (p-RIPK3) using 3,3′ diaminobenzidine as the chromogen and hematoxylin counterstain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Tumor Xenograft Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumors were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin embedded, and hematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) stained. Outgrowths were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the expression of biomarkers. Immunostaining was performed on a Discovery XT Platform (Ventana Medical System, Tucson, AZ, part of Roche Diagnostics) with antigen retrieval using either EDTA buffer, pH 8.0 (CC1, Ventana Medical System) or citrate buffer 10 mM, pH 6.0 (CC2, Ventana Medical System). Primary antibodies were mostly monoclonal rabbit antibodies, and paired slides immunostained with rabbit IgG were used as negative controls. Incubation and color development involved anti-rabbit multimer secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase complex) with DAB (3,30-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) as a substrate (ChromoMap Kit with Anti-rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System). The IHC slides were scanned using a Pannoramic SCAN II (3DHISTECH). We then used the HALO software (Indica Labs) to quantify the expression levels of ER, pAkt (S473), and p-S6riboprotein (S235/6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Glioblastoma Xenograft Model in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used male athymic nude mice (6 wk old; Central Lab. Animal Inc.). The mice were housed in micro-isolator cages under sterile conditions and observed for at least 1 week before study initiation, to ensure proper health. Lighting, temperature, and humidity were centrally controlled. Dissociated GBM TSs (5 × 105 per mouse) were implanted into the right frontal lobe of mice at a depth of 4.5 mm, using guide-screw system [35 (link)]. The mice were randomly allocated based on their body weights without blinding (n =  5 mice per group). If the body weight decreased by more than 15% relative to the maximum weight, mice were euthanized according to the approved protocol. For bioluminescence acquisition and analyses, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 100 μL D-luciferin (30 mg/mL; Promega) under 2.5% isoflurane anesthesia, 15 min before signal acquisition, and then observed using IVIS imaging system and Living Image v4.2 software (Caliper Life Sciences). For immunohistochemistry, sections (5 μm thick) were obtained using a microtome and transferred onto adhesive slides. Antigen retrieval and antibody attachment were performed using the Discovery XT platform (Ventana Medical Systems). Zeb1 was detected using a peroxidase/DAB staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical analysis of PKD1 in breast cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded breast tumors samples, obtained at the time of initial diagnosis, were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Biopathology at René Huguenin Hospital. Sections of 3 μm in thickness were cut with a microtome from the paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of normal breast tissue, pre-invasive lesions and IBCs (invasive breast cancer). Tissue sections were dewaxed and rehydrated through a series of xylene and ethanol washes. Immunostaining was performed on a Dako automated system. Primary antibody against PKD1 (Cell signaling, Danvers, MA) was incubated overnight at 4°C (dilution 1/100).
Patient-derived xenografts were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were immunostained in a Discovery XT Platform (Ventana Medical System, Tucson, Arizona, USA, part of Roche Diagnostics) using EDTA buffer pH 8.0 (CC1, Ventana Medical System) for antigen retrieval. Primary antibody against PKD1 (Cell signaling, Danvers, MA) was incubated during 30 min at 37°C (dilution 1/100). After incubation with anti-rabbit secondary antibodies, slides were covered with the chromogenic substrate diaminobenzidine (ChromoMap Kit with Anti rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System) and counterstained with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemistry of Colon Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded 5 μM sections of distal colon were deparaffinized, rehydrated through graded ethanol, and morphologically checked with H&E. For immunohistochemistry, sections were stained with the following antibodies: monoclonal mouse anti-human cytokeratin 20 (CK20, clone Ks20.8, M7019, Dako, 1:500) and monoclonal mouse anti-E-Cadherin (clone 36, 790-4497, Ventana). All immunostains were performed using Ventana Discovery XT Platform, using CC1 standard regime for CK20 and CC1 mild regime for E-cadherin. Primary antibodies were applied for 60 min followed by biotinylated anti-mouse secondary antibody also for 60 min (Vector, 1:200). Visualization was performed using Ventana DAB map kit. Quantitation of E-cadherin+ and CK20+ cells was done using Fiji software [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical analysis of RB1 and SLFN11

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumors were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunostaining was performed on a DISCOVERY XT Platform (Ventana Medical Systems, part of Roche Diagnostics). The slides were incubated with a monoclonal mouse antibody against RB1 (no. 9309, clone 4H1, Cell Signaling Technology) and a polyclonal rabbit antibody against SLFN11 (no. HPA023030, Sigma-Adrich). Slides immunostained with mouse and rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) were used as negative controls. Slides were incubated with anti-rabbit/mouse secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase complex) and DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) as the substrate for color development (ChromoMap Kit with anti-rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical Systems). Immunostaining of RB1 was performed as detailed in previous works (14 (link), 28 (link)). Expression of SLFN11 was quantified with the H-score: Sections were scored for intensity (0 to 3+) and extent (0 to 100%) of staining. By multiplying intensity and extent of staining, each tumor was assigned an H-score (range: 0 to 300). We considered a tumor SLFN11 negative with H-score = 0, SLFN11 low with an H-score between 1 and 60, and SLFN11 high when the H-score was higher than 60.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Immune Cell Populations in FFPE Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE specimens were sectioned at five-micrometers and stained on the DISCOVERY XT platform (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, U.S.A). TAM and microglia were identified using antibodies against IBA1. Antibodies targeting CD3 and CD8 stained the entire T cell population and cytotoxic T cells, respectively. Regulatory T cells were stained by antibodies against forkhead box P3 (FOXP3). Due to the lack of a validated antibody, the CD4+ T cell number was estimated to be the difference between the CD3+ and CD8+ T cell numbers according to published protocol.35 In six cases, the number of CD8+ T cells exceeded or was identical to the number of CD3+ T cells, so that the CD4+ T cell population was considered to be equal to the FOXP3+ T cell number, since the latter constitutes a subpopulation of CD4+ T cells. The following primary antibodies were used: Anti-IBA1 (1:500, rabbit polyclonal, #019–19741, Wako Pure Chemical Ind., Ltd., Osaka, Japan); anti-human FOXP3, clone 259D (1:100, mouse monoclonal, #320202, BioLegend, San Diego, U.S.A); anti-human CD8, clone C8/144B (1:100, mouse monoclonal, code M7103, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark); anti-human CD3 (1:100, rabbit polyclonal, code A0452, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Hemoglobin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections (4 µm) were cut with a Leica RM2245 Semi-automated Rotary Microtome and were adhered to Superfrost Plus slides (MICROM, Walldorf, Germany), deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated in a graded series of alcohol. Immunostaining was performed in a Discovery XT Platform (Ventana Medical System, Tucson, Arizona, USA, part of Roche Diagnostics) with antigen retrieval using EDTA buffer, pH 8 (CC1, Ventana Medical System) for primary antibodies anti-HbB (ref OM-B4339, purchased from Omics) and anti-HbA1 (ref GTX42177, purchased from Genetex). Incubation and color development used biotinylated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody, and streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase complex with DAB as substrate (DABMap Kit with Universal Secondary Antibody, Ventana Medical System).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HORMAD1 in Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumors were fixed in 10% neutral‐buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunostaining was performed on a Discovery XT Platform (VentanaMedical System, Cambdrige, UK, part of RocheDiagnostics), as previously detailed [15 (link)]. The slides were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against HORMAD1 (SIGMA, #HPA037850). Slides immunostained with rabbit IgG were used as negative controls. Slides were incubated with an anti‐rabbit secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase complex) and 3,30‐diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) as the substrate for color development (ChromoMap Kit with Anti‐rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System). HORMAD1 immunostaining was assessed by determining the intensity and distribution of stained cancer cells. Expression of HORMAD1 was quantified with the H‐score: Sections were scored for intensity (0–3+) and extent (0–100%) of staining. By multiplying intensity and extent of staining, each tumor was assigned an H‐score (range: 0–300). We considered a tumor HORMAD1 negative with H‐score = 0, HORMAD1 low with an H‐score between 1 and 70, and HORMAD1 high when the H‐score was higher than 70, 70 being the median H‐score.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!