The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Picogreen dsdna quantitation assay

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation assay is a fluorescence-based method for quantifying double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in solution. The assay uses a proprietary dye that binds to dsDNA and emits a fluorescent signal, allowing for the sensitive and selective detection of dsDNA in a sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using picogreen dsdna quantitation assay

1

High-Quality DNA Isolation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA isolation was performed using a high molecular weight genomic DNA purification kit as described by the manufacturer (Qiagen). DNA was quantitated using the Picogreen® dsDNA quantitation assay (Molecular Probes/Life Technologies) using a microplate reader (Wallac 1420 VICTOR™ F) with a 535 nm excitation filter and a 485 nm emission filter. A standard curve with a Lambda DNA was constructed in order to determine the correct DNA concentration of the samples. Before performing the DNA damage analysis, DNA samples (100 ng) were visualized by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide to ensure that no degradation occurred during the isolation procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA-seq and DNA Sequencing from FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), total RNAs were extracted from additional FFPE tissue sections from the same patients, and cDNA were synthesized according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Non-tumorous samples were used as controls for RNA-seq. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Maxwell (R) 16 FFPE Plus LEV DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and quantified with PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation assay (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). All samples passed the in-house quality control criteria of next-generation sequencing library. The library preparation was performed through Agilent SureSect V5 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and TruSeqProtocol with TruSeq Exome Enrichment (Illumina, San Diego, CA). DNA sequencing and RNA-seq was performed using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 100 bp×2 paired-end reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Methylation-based Medulloblastoma Subtyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples, where DNA was of sufficient quantity and quality as assessed by PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation assay (Life Technologies), were processed on the 450K methylation array (Illumina). Subgrouping according to methylation status was achieved using established methods (Hovestadt et al., 2013; Schwalbe et al., 2013 ). Consensus nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering of a 225 member primary medulloblastoma training cohort was used to define four methylation-dependent disease subgroups by identifying subgroup-specific metagenes. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier to assign subgroup for additional diagnostic and relapsed medulloblastoma samples, based on their projected metagene profiles (Tamayo et al., 2007 (link)), was developed using previously published methods (Schwalbe et al., 2013 (link)). Confidence of the classifier call made for these samples was assessed by repeated sampling of 80% of the training cohort to rederive the classifier. Mutational analysis of CTNNB1 (Table S1) (Taylor et al., 2012 (link)) was performed as previously described (Ellison et al., 2005, 2011 ) (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Extracellular Matrix Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanically tested samples were bisected and weighed, and half of each construct was lyophilized and digested in 0.5 mg/mL proteinase K solution (Fisher Scientific) overnight at 56 °C (Hollander et al., 1994 (link); Kelly et al., 2006 (link)). Sulfated GAG content was determined by dimethylmethylene blue spectrophotometric assay (Farndale et al., 1986 (link); Kelly et al., 2006 (link)), collagen content was assessed by orthohydroxyproline assay of acid-hydrolysates of proteinase K digests (Kelly et al., 2006 (link)) assuming a 1:7.64 OHP-to-collagen mass ratio (Hollander et al., 1994 (link)), and DNA content was determined by PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation assay (Life Technologies) using lambda bacteriophage standard. sGAG and collagen contents were expressed as a percentage of the constructs’ final wet weights (%/ww), and DNA content was used to estimate cellularity assuming 7.7 pg DNA/cell (Kim et al., 1988 (link); McGowan et al., 2002 (link)). Aliquots of spent media, taken at the time of each media change, were also assayed for sGAG content. Cumulative masses of media sGAG over the culture period were calculated and normalized to the day-0 volume of the constructs (mg/mL). Additionally, sGAG retention fractions were computed based upon the formula:
R.F.=mass(sGAG)constructmass(sGAG)construct+mass(sGAG)media×100%
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Extracellular Matrix Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were lyophilized, weighed, and digested overnight at 60°C in 0.125 U/ml papain from papaya latex (Sigma-Aldrich). GAG, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and collagen contents were measured using the 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay, the PicoGreen® dsDNA Quantitation Assay (Life Technologies), and the hydroxyproline assay (Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. For the hydroxyproline assay, we used a hydroxyproline:collagen ratio of 1:7.64 [44 (link)]. Biochemical content was normalized by pre-decellularization sample wet weight (WW) or post-decellularization sample dry weight (DW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Cellular DNA Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were analysed for their chromosmal DNA content before ICP-MS measurements. DNA was quantified by the PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation assay (Invitrogen). PicoGreen (50 μl per well, 200 × diluted in 10 mM Tris+1 mM EDTA buffer) was added to 50 μl of DNA sample and the fluorescence signal was determined by spectrofluorometric analysis (484 nm excitation/520 nm emission) using an automated reader (SpectraMax5e, Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Proliferation Quantification by PicoGreen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine changes in the cell number a PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation assay (Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA) was performed. Prior to exposure to the testing materials, 10,000 cells per cm2 were seeded as duplets into 24-well plates. Subsequently, the medium was changed to differentiation medium and the PMMA samples were given to the cells. Cells without testing material served as a negative control. At day 1, 7 and 21 after addition of material cells were lyzed with 1% Triton X-100 in phosphate buffered saline, before removing the testing material. The lysates were frozen at −80°C, thawed and centrifugated. The supernatants were transferred as triplets to a 96-well plate and mixed with the PicoGreen working solution. The samples were excited at 485 nm and the fluorescence emission intensity was measured at 528 nm using the Synergy HT Microplate Reader.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 1.5 g of the surface-sterilized plant sample was frozen with liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder in a sterilized and precooled mortar. DNA was extracted using a Plant DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, USA) and the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplified using Bac 341f (5′-CCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTN-3′) and Univ 805r (5′-GACTGGAGT TCCTTGGCACCCGAGAATTCCA-3′) primers. The 50 μl PCR reaction mixture contained 100 ng of DNA extract, 1× Taq reaction buffer, 20 pmol of each primer, 200 μM each dNTP and 1.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Sangong Biotech, China). DNA aliquots were PCR-amplified with 5 min denaturation at 95 °C, 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 50 s at 55 °C, and 72 °C for 1 min, after which a final elongation step at 72 °C for 5 min was performed. All samples were amplified. Replicate PCR products of the same sample were assembled within a PCR tube. Then they were visualized on agarose gels (2% in TBE buffer) containing ethidium bromide, and purified with a DNA gel extraction kit (Sangong Biotech, China). After purification, the concentration of the PCR products was measured on Qubit®2.0 Fluorometer using the PicoGreen® dsDNA quantitation assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). DNA concentration was adjusted to 1 ng/ml. The amplicon libraries were prepared by pooling 10 ng of each PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Genomic DNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted and quantified (PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation assay; Invitrogen) and quality assessed (Genomic DNA ScreenTape; Agilent). 100-500 ng of genomic DNA was sheared (Covaris E220evolution Focused-ultrasonicator), and fragment size was assessed (Agilent 2200 TapeStation, High Sensitivity DNA Kit). Library preparation was performed using the optimized “with-bead” protocol (KAPA). PCR primers were removed (AMPure PCR Purification kit; Agencourt Bioscience) and samples quantified (KAPA Library Quantification Kit). Equimolar quantities of DNA were pooled (2-6 samples per pool) and captured (NimbleGen SeqCap EZ v3.0 Enrichment Kit). Captured libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq 4000 Illumina Sequencer on a version 3 TruSeq paired end flowcell for 2 x 100 paired end reads. BCL files were demultiplexed using CASAVA 1.8.2 with no mismatches.
We called variants using the BETSY system using a consensus-based pipeline previously described (36 (link),37 (link)). In short, reads were aligned to hg19 using BWA, pre-processed using the GATK Best Practices workflow, and variants called with six callers, accepting ones found by at least 2 callers not seen in high discrepancy regions (38 (link)), using custom software. We annotated variants with Annovar and found copy number alterations using FACETS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

16S Amplicon Sequencing of Jellyfish Compartments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pooled samples (eight for each of the three jellyfish compartments M, A, U) were gathered over the course of field samplings carried out in July 2016 and February 2017 for 16S amplicon sequencing analyses. All pools were stored at −20 °C, and then lyophilized (FreeZone® 12 L; Labconco, Kansas City, MO). Three hundred milligrams of each freeze-dried sample were subjected to the DNA extraction using the FastDNA SPIN kit for soil (BIO 101, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Qualitative and quantitative DNA assessment was carried out using the PicoGreen® dsDNA quantitation assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) and agarose gel (1%) electrophoresis. DNA extraction blanks (sterile distilled water) were prepared and processed together with the jellyfish samples in order to exclude any contaminations related to the extraction reagents and procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!