The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using bwa4c

1

Basophil and Mast Cell Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow-derived basophils (BMBAs) and bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) were generated as described previously [20] (link), [21] with minor modification. In brief, mouse bone marrow cells were cultured with 10 ng/mL murine IL-3 and 2 ng/mL murine SCF for 40 days to obtain BMMCs while they were cultured with 0.1 ng/mL IL-3 for 7 days to obtain BMBAs. In case of BMBAs, the basophil fraction in cultured bone marrow cells was purified with positive sorting of CD49b+ cells by using MACS pro system (Miltenyi Biotec). The purity of basophils (CD49b+CD200R3+cKit-) in the BMBA preparation and mast cells (CD200R3+cKit+) in the BMMC preparation was >90%. Identity of basophils and mast cells was verified by their selective expression of Mcpt8 and Mcpt6 mRNAs encoding serine proteases mMCP-8 and mMCP6, respectively [20] (link), [22] , [23] . BMBAs and BMMCs were sensitized overnight with 1 μg/mL of hapten 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl (TNP)-specific IgE (IGELb4, ATCC-TIB141), and then incubated with 10 ng/mL TNP-conjugated ovalbumin (TNP12-OVA, Biosearch Tech.) or control ovalbumin (OVA, Invivogen) for indicated time periods. In some experiments, before stimulation, cells were pretreated for 10 min with of 3 μmol/L of inhibitors, including BW-A4C (5-LOX inhibitor, Sigma), SC-560 (COX-1 inhibitor, Cayman Chemicals), and celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Oocyte Maturation Modulation by Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For treatment with inhibitors, INDO (Selleck Chemicals, TX, USA; Cat#: S5010), BWA4C (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA; Cat#: B7559), Sesamin (Selleck Chemicals, TX, USA; Cat#: S2392), and Curcumin (Selleck Chemicals, TX, USA; Cat#: S1848) solutions were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and then diluted to yield a final concentration in maturation medium as needed. GV oocytes were in vitro cultured in M16 medium containing different doses of inhibitor for further analysis. Correspondingly, 0.1% DMSO was included as a control. To assess the effects of PUFAs on oocyte maturation, fully grown GV oocytes were cultured in M16 medium supplemented with different concentrations of ARA, DHA, and EPA. The relevant phenotypes were examined at the indicated time points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lipoprotein Depletion and Lipid Signaling Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AA-861, BWA4C, α-tocopherol, linoleic acid, arachidonic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide were from Sigma. CAY10566, Mead acid, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, erastin, ferrostatin-1, and (1S,3R)-RSL3 were from Cayman Chemical. SC560, SC236, MK886, Zileuton, BAY-X1005, PD146176, and deferoxamine were from Tocris Bioscience. PSI-7977 (Sofosbuvir) and Glecaprevir were from Chemscene. Cell viability was determined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (DOJINDO, Japan). Lipoprotein-deprived serum (LPDS) was prepared by incubating the heat-inactivated FBS with fumed silica (Sigma, S5130) overnight, followed by removal of the silica by centrifugation at 2,000g for 20 min and filtration using a 0.22 μm filter device.
Primary antibodies to SCD (1:500 dilution, #2438) was from Cell Signaling Technology; FADS1 (1:1,000 dilution, #27533) was from Cayman Chemical; FADS2 (1:1,000 dilution, A10270) were from ABclonal; FADS2 (1:1,000 dilution, 28034–1-AP) was from Proteintech; HCV NS3 (1:500, ab13830) was from Abcam; GAPDH was from Wako (1:4,000 dilution, 016–25523). IRDye 680 or 800 secondary antibodies including #926–32211, #926–32212, #926–32214, #926–68020 and #926–68073 (1:20,000) were from LI-COR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!