Spss 14 0 version 14

Manufactured by IBM

Sourced in United States

SPSS 14.0, version 14.0.1 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and presentation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Jmp version 12, by SAS Institute (4 mentions)

Spelling variants of this product

SPSS version (3082 citations) SPSS version 14.0 (336 citations) SPSS 14.0 (62 citations) SPSS version 14.0 for Windows (18 citations) SPSSTM (8 citations) SPSS 14.0 for Windows, version 14.0.1 (3 citations) SPSS 14.0 version (2 citations) SPSS software 14.0 version (2 citations) SPSS for Windows, Version 14.0 32 bit (2 citations) SPSS (version 14.0 J) (2 citations)

6 protocols using spss 14 0 version 14

Statistical Analysis of Patient Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Patient demographics and the other interventions characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, such as means, medians, ranges, and percentages. Values were compared using non parametric tests as Mann-Whitney test (M-W test), Chi square test, Fisher test. Differences between pre and post values were compared using Wilcoxon nonparametric test for two paired groups. The threshold for significance was p = 0.05.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 14.0, version 14.0.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and JMP, version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007).

Tassinari E., Mariotti F., Castagnini F., Lucchini S., Perdisa F., Bracci G., Cosentino M., Bordini B, & Traina F. (2021). Isolated arthroscopic treatment of intra-articular pathologies in mild hip dysplasia: a short-term case control study. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 8, 112.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Radiographic Evaluation Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The study variables were analyzed and compared among groups using nonparametric Mood’s median tests (SPSS 14.0, version 14.0.1; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Significance was set at P value < 0.05.
Ethical approval for the study has not been necessary since no additional clinical procedures have been performed beside the standard radiographic evaluation, and the anonymity of patients was preserved.
All patients provided written informed consent for the inclusion in the study, in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2000.

Digennaro V., Ferri R., Panciera A., Bordini B., Cecchin D., Benvenuti L., Traina F, & Faldini C. (2024). Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification and its impact on medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: exposing a unexpected external shift of limb mechanical axis in case of prearthritic constitutional valgus alignment: a retrospective radiographic study. Knee Surgery & Related Research, 36, 14.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Revision Surgery Survival Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Patients’ ages were compared using a t-test. Sex and implant-related features were compared using chi-square analysis. The survival rate of patients was calculated and plotted according to the Kaplan–Meier method. The end-point was stem or neck revision, whereas revision of the cup/insert was not considered as a failure, since it did not involve stem issues. Implants were followed until the last date of observation (date of death or December 31, 2016). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 14.0, version 14.0.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and JMP, version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA, 1989–2007).

Affatato S., Cosentino M., Castagnini F, & Bordini B. (2019). Registry study on failure incidence in 1,127 revised hip implants with stem trunnion re-use after 10 years of follow-up: limited influence of an adapter sleeve. Acta Orthopaedica, 90(5), 417-420.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Survival Analysis of Prosthetic Implants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 14.0, version 14.0.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and JMP, version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, 1989–2007). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, presented as median and mean with standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and as frequency with percentage (%) for categorical variables. Statistical significance was calculated using the Mann–Whitney test for clinical quantitative data. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Survival curves were calculated and plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prosthesis failure is defined as the revision of even one prosthetic component. Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between the survival time of implants and multiple predictive variables. Implants were followed until the last date of observation (date of death or date of visit).

Di Martino A., Coppola M.A., Bordini B., Stefanini N., Geraci G., Pilla F., Traina F, & Faldini C. (2021). Clinical and radiological outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients affected by Paget’s disease: a combined registry and single-institution retrospective observational study. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 22, 13.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Comparative Analysis of Study Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Study variables were analysed and compared among groups. Comparison among the groups was performed by using Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests (SPSS 14.0, version 14.0.1; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Significance was set at p-value < 0.05.

Di Martino A., Stefanini N., Brunello M., Bordini B., Pilla F., Geraci G., D’Agostino C., Ruta F, & Faldini C. (2023). Is the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Effective in Obese Patients? Early Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Retrospective Comparative Study. Medicina, 59(4), 769.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Long-Term Survival Analysis of Hip Implants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Demographics, implant features, and reasons for revision were recorded. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The primary endpoint was stem revision, with a focus on breakage and aseptic loosening. Ninety-five-percent confidence interval was established for all required distributions. Revision of the cup/insert was not considered as failure. Implants were followed until the last date of observation (date of death or 31st December 2017). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 14.0, version 14.0.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and JMP, version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, 1989–2007). Wilcoxon tests assessed the statistically significant differences between the survival curves: the significance threshold (p) was set at 0.05.
Approval of the institutional review board was not necessary, as RIPO respects the standard levels of ethics and conceals patients’ identity as a standard practice.

Pardo F., Bordini B., Castagnini F., Giardina F., Faldini C, & Traina F. (2021). Are powder-technology-built stems safe? A midterm follow-up registry study. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine, 32(1), 10.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!