The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Medcalc15

Manufactured by MedCalc
Sourced in Belgium

MedCalc15.8 is a software application designed for statistical analysis and data management. It provides a range of functionalities for researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals to perform various statistical calculations and analyses on medical data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using medcalc15

1

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 17.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to evaluate the normality of the distribution of the dataset using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and to perform the chi-square test for the categorical data. The T test is used for normally distributed variables, and the Mann-Whitney test is used for non-normally distributed variables. The conditional forward stepwise selection method was applied for the multivariable logistic regression model. MedCalc15.8 software (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium) was used to assess the ROC curves for the diagnostic performance of the models, and differences between the various AUCs were compared with the DeLong test. R statistical software was used for all other statistical analyses. The “mRMRe” and “gbm” packages were used for mRMR and GBDT analyses, respectively. DCA plots were generated with the “dca. R” package. Two-tailed p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis for Biomedical Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 17.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for evaluating the normality of the distribution of the data, and the chi-square test for the categorical data. The likelihood ratio test with backward step-down selection was applied to the multivariate logistic regression model. VIFs were calculated using the SPSS 17.0 software. The MedCalc15.8 software (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium) was used to assess the ROC curves, and differences between various AUCs were compared with the DeLong test. The R statistical software Version 3.4.1 was used for all other statistical analyses. The “mRMRe” and “glmnet” packages were used for mRMR and LASSO analyses. Calibration plots and the radiomics nomogram were established with the “rms” package, and DCA with the “dca.R” package. Two-sided p < 0.05 were considered as being statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Mortality Prediction Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MedCalc 15.8 software (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium). Data were analyzed, and the continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and nominal variables were reported as total number and percentages.
Variables were first evaluated by One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as a normality test to choose the type of statistical tests –parametric or non-parametric test–, and the results showed that asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) levels ≤0.05 so we decided to use non-parametric tests. For statistical analysis, correlations between variables were evaluated for significance by using the Spearman’s rho test. Categorical variables were evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U test of contingency. In all analyses, a ‘p’ value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Apart from this, we established a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the ability of LC-1 and LC-2 to predict 30-day mortality. In this analysis, ROC-Area Under Curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify the accuracy of the predictive model. AUC value > 0.75 was appraised as satisfactory, AUC value > 0.8 was appraised as well, and AUC value > 0.9 was appraised as very good.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD and categorical as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were compared with the use of 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test when P-value was <0.05, or Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test followed by Dunn multiple comparisons test (for a P-value <0.05), when normality or an equal variance test failed. Categorical variables were compared with the use of the Pearson Chi-square (sigma stat). Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism software 6.0 (www.graphpad.com). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed using MedCalc 15.8 software (www.medcalc.be).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

APEH Gene Polymorphism and Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results for the analyzed gene genotyping were retrospectively linked with the patients’ OM and OS. The obtained results were statistically analyzed using MedCalc15.8 Software (Belgium). The result values of p < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. Chi Square (χ2) test was used to evaluate Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) balance, the occurrence and intensity of OM and the correlation between several demographic-clinical factors. Odds Ratio (OR) was used to evaluate the risk of OM development in relation to demographic-clinical factors distribution and polymorphic variants of APEH gene. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the probability of OS in relation to APEH genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!