The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using nbp2 25208

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Macrophage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin sections were dewaxed sequentially in the order of 15 min for xylen I, 15 min for xylen II, 5 min for absolute ethanol I, 5 min for absolute ethanol II, 5 min for 90% alcohol, 5 min for 80% alcohol, and 5 min for 70% alcohol. Finally, the sections were washed with distilled water. After the sections were repaired with EDTA antigen recovery solution, they were incubated in 5% BSA for 30 min at room temperature. Gently shaked off the blocking solution, added anti-CD163 (ab182422, Abcam, 1:100), anti-CD206 (sc-58,986, Santa Cruz, 1:50), anti-CD86 (NBP2-25,208, Novus, 1:100), anti-HLA-DR (MA5-32,232, Invitrogen, 1:100). Then incubated overnight in a wet box at 4°C. The slices were placed in PBS (pH 7.4) and washed with decolorizing shaker for 3 times, 5 min each time. After the slices were slightly dried, the secondary antibody (dilution ratio: 1:200) corresponding to the primary antibody was dropped into the circle to cover the tissue, and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 50 min. DAPI counter-stained nuclei: the slices were placed in PBS (pH 7.4) and washed with decolorizing shaker for 3 times, 5 min each time. After the slices were shaken dried, DAPI dye solution was added dropwise to the circle, and incubated in the dark for 10 min at room temperature. Sealed the film and took pictures under the microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macrophage Phenotype Switching Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All specimens were decalcified in 10% disodium Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA‐Na2, Solarbio, Beijing, China) at room temperature for ≈30 days. Subsequently, the decalcified samples were longitudinally embedded in paraffin wax and cut into 5 µm sections.
In order to detect phenotype switching of macrophages in vivo, immunofluorescence staining was performed. Tissue sections of 4 and 7 days were incubated with primary antibodies of anti‐CD86 (2 µg mL−1, NBP2‐25208, Novus) and anti‐CD206 (10 µg mL−1, ab64693, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight followed by incubation with the corresponding fluorescently labeled secondary antibody (CD86: CoraLite594‐conjugated Goat Anti‐Mouse IgG, CD206: CoraLite488‐conjugated Goat Anti‐Rabbit IgG; 1:200; Proteintech) and DAPI. The fluorescent images were obtained with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus), Image J was used to quantify the fluorescence intensity of the stained markers and normalized to DAPI‐stained nuclei counts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Staining of Macrophage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used; rabbit anti-EMR1 (NBP231090, Novus, Littleton, CO, USA), mouse anti-CD206 monoclonal antibody (mAb; MAB25341, Novus), mouse anti-CD86 mAb (NBP2-25208, Novus), anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mAb (mouse IgG1, clone II-7, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), and FITC-conjugated anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) mAb (mouse IgG1, clone BerEP4, Dako) were used as primary antibodies. Mouse IgG, ready to use (Dako), rabbit IgG ready to use (Dako) and FITC-conjugated mouse IgG (F0313, Dako) were used as negative controls. ImmPRESS micropolymer HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (MP-7401, Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), ImmPRESS micropolymer HRP conjugated anti-mouse IgG (MP-7402, Vector laboratories), Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (ab150116, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (ab150078, Abcam) were used as secondary antibodies. The peroxidase substrate used was 3,3 -diaminobenzidine (DAB; Vector Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescent Macrophage Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence, frozen sections were labeled with unconjugated primary antibodies against MOMA-2 (1:200, MCA519G; AbD) and a M1 marker [iNOS (1:200, ab178945; Abcam) or CD86 (1:200, NBP2-25208; Novus)], or a M2 marker [Arg1 (1:200, ab60176; Abcam) or CD206 (1:200, ab64693; Abcam)] simultaneously overnight, followed by incubation with a fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min. The stained sections were mounted with DAPI-containing VectorShield mounting medium (Vector) and then viewed using an Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!