The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse monoclonal anti flag m2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase

Manufactured by Merck Group

The mouse monoclonal anti-flag M2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and identification of proteins tagged with the FLAG epitope. It consists of a mouse-derived monoclonal antibody specific to the FLAG peptide sequence, conjugated to the enzyme horseradish peroxidase. This product can be used in various immunoassay techniques, such as Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA).

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using mouse monoclonal anti flag m2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase

1

Spo11-oligo Complexes Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysates and extracts were prepared as previously described48 (link). Immunoprecipitation of Spo11-oligo complexes was performed using 5 μg of mouse monoclonal anti-flag M2 antibody (Sigma). Precipitated Spo11-oligo complexes were end-labeled in NEBuffer 4 (New England Biolabs) containing 3–10 μCi of [α-32P]dCTP and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)48 (link). Twenty-five μl of reaction mixture was added to the beads, mixed, and incubated at 37°C for 1–2 hr. Spo11-oligo complexes were eluted by adding 25 μl of NUPAGE® loading buffer (diluted to 2× and supplemented with 83.3 mM dithiothreitol) (Invitrogen) and boiling for 5 min. End-labeled Spo11-oligo complexes were separated on a Novex® 4–12% gradient denaturing polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen) then transferred onto PVDF membrane using the iBlot protocol (Invitrogen) and visualized by phosphorimager. Blots were probed with mouse monoclonal anti-flag M2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma). Chemiluminescent detection was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (ECL+ or ECL Prime, Amersham). Protein quantity was estimated by separating 1 μl of extract on a Novex® 4–12% gradient denaturing polyacrylamide gel and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Mapping of Spo11-Oligo Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spo11-oligo complexes were extracted and detected as previously described (Supplemental Fig. S3A; Thacker et al. 2014 (link)). Briefly, Spo11-oligo complexes were immunoprecipitated from whole-cell extracts by using mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma). Precipitated Spo11-oligo complexes were end-labeled with [α-32P]dCTP in a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase reaction, resolved by SDS-PAGE, then transferred onto PVDF membrane and visualized by PhosphorImager. Blots were probed with mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma) and detected by chemiluminescent (ECL+ or ECL Prime, Amersham).
For Spo11-oligo mapping, sporulation cultures of different volumes (450 mL for homeologous strain; 300 mL for trisomic strain; 600 mL for all other strains) were harvested at desired time points after transferring to sporulation media. Maps were generated for this study in strains carrying SPO11-FLAG as described (Murakami et al. 2020 (link)) except for the trisomic strain carrying SPO11-PrA. Previously published wild-type maps (Thacker et al. 2014 (link); Mohibullah and Keeney 2017 (link)) were used as controls in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spo11-oligo Complexes Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysates and extracts were prepared as previously described48 (link). Immunoprecipitation of Spo11-oligo complexes was performed using 5 μg of mouse monoclonal anti-flag M2 antibody (Sigma). Precipitated Spo11-oligo complexes were end-labeled in NEBuffer 4 (New England Biolabs) containing 3–10 μCi of [α-32P]dCTP and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)48 (link). Twenty-five μl of reaction mixture was added to the beads, mixed, and incubated at 37°C for 1–2 hr. Spo11-oligo complexes were eluted by adding 25 μl of NUPAGE® loading buffer (diluted to 2× and supplemented with 83.3 mM dithiothreitol) (Invitrogen) and boiling for 5 min. End-labeled Spo11-oligo complexes were separated on a Novex® 4–12% gradient denaturing polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen) then transferred onto PVDF membrane using the iBlot protocol (Invitrogen) and visualized by phosphorimager. Blots were probed with mouse monoclonal anti-flag M2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma). Chemiluminescent detection was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (ECL+ or ECL Prime, Amersham). Protein quantity was estimated by separating 1 μl of extract on a Novex® 4–12% gradient denaturing polyacrylamide gel and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mapping Genome-wide Spo11 Oligonucleotides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spo11-oligo complexes were extracted and detected as previously described (Supplemental Fig. S3A) (Neale and Keeney 2009) . Briefly, Spo11-oligo complexes were immunoprecipitated from whole-cell extracts by using mouse monoclonal anti-Flag M2 antibody (Sigma). Precipitated Spo11-oligo complexes were end-labeled with [α-32P ] dCTP in a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase reaction, resolved by SDS-PAGE, then transferred onto PVDF membrane and visualized by phosphorimager. Blots were probed with mouse monoclonal anti-Flag M2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma) and detected by chemiluminescent (ECL+ or ECL Prime, Amersham).
For Spo11-oligo mapping, sporulation cultures of different volumes (450 ml for homeologous strain; 300 ml for trisomic strain; 600 ml for all other strains) were harvested at desired time points after transferring to sporulation media. Maps were generated for this study in strains carrying SPO11-Flag as described (Lam et al. 2017 ) except for the trisomic strain carrying SPO11-PrA. Previously published wild-type maps (Thacker et al. 2014; Mohibullah and Keeney 2017) were used as controls in this study. For the PCA and clustering analyses, we also included other wild-type and zip3∆ maps (Zhu and Keeney 2015; Mohibullah and Keeney 2017; Murakami et al. 2020) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!