The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using sequencher software version 4

1

Phylogenetic Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequences were assembled using Sequencher software, version 4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, USA). Nucleotide alignments were constructed using the ClustalW program embedded in MEGA version 7 software [11 (link)]. Phylogenetic trees were generated by means of the Maximum likelihood method with the Kimura 3-parameter as an evolutionary model using MEGA version 7 software [12 (link)]. A bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates was performed. The nucleotide sequences identified in this study have been submitted to the GenBank database with accession numbers KY357920-KY357974.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Influenza A/H1N1pdm09 HA Gene Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The complete influenza A/H1N1pdm09 HA gene was amplified directly from clinical specimens using the SuperScriptIII One-Step RT-PCR amplification kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) and specific primers (available upon request). Purified PCR products were sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle-Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) in an ABI Prism 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Sequences were assembled using the Sequencher software, version 4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, USA). Nucleotide alignments were constructed using the ClustalW program embedded in the MEGA version 5 software [16 (link)]. Phylogenetic trees were generated by means of the Maximum likelihood method with the Kimura 3-parameter as an evolutionary model using MEGA version 5 software [16 (link)]. A bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates was performed. Sanger sequences originated in this study have been submitted to GenBank database with accession numbers KY345117-KY345168.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phylogenetic Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences were assembled using Sequencher software, version 4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Nucleotide alignments were constructed using the ClustalW program embedded in MEGA version 7 software [36 (link)]. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was inferred using the IQ-Tree web server (version 1.6.8) [37 (link)] and the robustness of branches was evaluated using the ultrafast bootstrap approximation tests with 1000 replicates. The nucleotide sequences identified in this study have been submitted to the GenBank database with accession numbers MK829607-MK829639, MK829789-MK829811, MK949213-MK949280 and MK949286-MK949339.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Detection of Malaria Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amino acid positions pfdhfr 16–185, pfdhps 436–632 and k13 407–689 were amplified using previously described PCR protocols and then sequenced commercially [13 (link), 15 (link), 23 (link)–26 (link)]. The Sequencher™ software version 4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used for sequence analysis. The P. falciparum 3D7 clone sequences obtained from NCBI database were used as references for pfdhfr, pfdhps and k13.
Previously described multiplex PCR–RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) methods with minor modifications were used to identify pfdhfr N51I, C59R and S108N and pfdhps S436F/A, A437G and K540E when sequencing failed and pfcrt K76T and pfmdr1 N86Y SNPs [23 (link), 27 (link), 28 (link)].
PCR and restriction products were resolved on 2% agarose gels (Amresco, Solon, OH, USA). All gels were stained with a nucleic acid gel stain (GelRed™, Biotium Inc, Hayward, CA, USA) and visualized under UV transillumination (GelDoc®, Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). PCR products were purified and sequenced commercially (Macrogen Inc, Seoul, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HIV-1 Resistance Genotyping in Panama

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples from HIV-1 seropositive individuals were collected by venipuncture at Gorgas Memorial Institute or received from local hospitals located at different provinces of Panama between mid-2007 to June 2013. HIV-1 pol region sequences were obtained using the Viroseq system (Celera Diagnostics, Alameda, CA) or an “in-house” assay (described below) drug resistance genotyping method. Sequence chromatograms from a total of 754 samples were retrieved from the HIV-1 Resistance Genotyping Test computers and carefully re-evaluated with Sequencher Software, version 4.5 (GeneCodes, Michigan, USA). From the 754 sequences obtained, 655 (404 sequences from Viroseq system and 251 sequences from the “in-house” assay) were selected based on sequence length and only one sequence per studied subject. The epidemiological information from the selected subjects was recovered from the Drug-Resistance Genotyping Test form, sent with the sample by an authorized infectious diseases specialist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identification and Analysis of CXCR6 Gene Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequence data were assembled and analyzed for the presence of SNPs and indels using SEQUENCHER software version 4.5 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Assembled sequences were aligned with each other and the published GenBank sequence (accession: EF064741.1) using SEQUENCHER, to identify polymorphisms. The GenBank NCBI SNP database (dbSNP) was searched for all reported SNPs in the CXCR6 gene to determine whether polymorphisms detected in this study had been previously reported. The first nucleotide of the CXCR6 translational start site was designated as +1 and the nucleotide immediately upstream from that as -1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BRAF Mutation Detection in FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each MA case, tumor genomic DNA was isolated from FFPE tissue blocks using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Commercially available male human genomic DNA (G1471; Promega, Madison, WI) served as a wild type BRAF exon 15 control, while genomic DNA isolated from SK-MEL-5 cells (HTB-70; ATCC, Manassas, VA) using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) served as a positive BRAF V600E control. BRAF exon 15 was PCR amplified from 50 nanograms of genomic DNA using flanking sequence-specific primers (forward: 5′-M13-TTTGTGAATACTGGGAACTATGAAA-3′; and, reverse: 5′-TCATCCTAACACATTTCAAGCC-3′) and HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes; 45 cycles of 94°C for 60 seconds, 50°C for 60 seconds, and 72°C for 60 seconds; and, final extension at 72°C for 7 minutes. After confirming the expected amplicon size by standard agarose gel electrophoresis, all PCR products were incubated with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) prior to bi-directional Sanger sequencing by the University of Michigan DNA Sequencing Core using the M13 forward and BRAF exon 15 PCR reverse primers. The resulting chromatograms were analyzed with Sequencher software, version 4.5 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI), and compared to reference sequence for BRAF exon 15 (NM_004333.4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Identifying Alternatively Spliced Isoforms in Barley

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify AS isoforms, BLAST searches were performed using barley clock genomic sequences identified previously [60 (link)] against GenBank and barley RNA-seq transcript databases [61 (link)]. For the RNA-seq data set, AS discovery analyses were carried out using the TABLET program version 1.14.10_20 [62 (link)]. To detect novel AS events and determine the sequences of unknown alternatively spliced isoforms, RT-PCR and cloning of amplified products was carried out. Sequences were analysed using Sequencher software version 4.9 (Gene Codes Corporation), which allowed trimming and cleaning of the sequences before alignment using the ClustalOmega software [63 (link)] on to genomic contigs to identify alternative splicing events and define the splice sites used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

APOE Genotype DNA Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frontal lobe tissue of subjects with APOEε3/ε4 genotypes were selected for this experiment. Bisulfite converted genomic DNA was PCR amplified by bisulfite-specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) using HotStarTaq DNA PCR master mix (Qiagen) with a profile of 95°C for 15min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 50°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 1 min, ending with 72°C for 5 min. PCR fragments were purified using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-Up kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) and were cloned into Xhol and Hindlll double-digested pGL4 vector (Promega, Madison, WI) using In-Fusion HD Cloning Plus kit (Clontech). The recombinant DNA was then transformed into Stellar competent cells (Clontech). A minimum of 19 clones from each sample were randomly selected and their inserts were PCR amplified using pGL4 vector-specific forward and reverse primers (Supplementary Table 1). PCR products were treated with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) overnight at 37°C to remove the residual primers and deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates prior to sequencing. PCR fragments were sequenced by the pGL4_R1 primer (Supplementary Table 1) using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) on a 3130xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were analyzed by Sequencher software version 4.9 (Gene Codes Corp, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!