The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1010 electron microscope

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, United States

The JEOL 1010 is a transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for high-resolution imaging of a wide range of materials. It features a LaB6 electron source and operates at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. The JEOL 1010 provides clear and detailed images of specimens at magnifications up to 1,000,000x.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

72 protocols using 1010 electron microscope

1

Mitochondrial Morphometry in Aging Hearts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation and the left ventricle apex was immediately dissected (3 months old, n = 3 per genotype and 20 months old, n = 3 per genotype). Heart samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES buffer for 4–5 hr. After buffer washes, samples were postfixed for 1 hr at room temperature in a 1:1 solution of 1% osmium tetroxide and 3% aqueous potassium ferrocyanide. Samples were rinsed in distilled H2O. Tissues were dehydrated through a graded acetone series and embedded in Spurr's low viscosity embedding mixture (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Ultra‐thin sections (60 nm) were then mounted on copper grids and stained with lead citrate. Samples were examined on a JEOL 10‐10 electron microscope through 1,500×, 5,000×, 40,000×, and 80,000× objectives. Mitochondrial morphometry, cristae area (2 images, 5,000×, per animal), and lipid droplets (50 images, 5,000×, per animal) were segmented manually and analyzed using Fiji (http://fiji.sc/Fiji) and ImageJ 1.48v software. The investigator was blinded to the group allocation when assessing the outcome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of Colitis Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Large intestine tissue samples from DSS-induced colitis mice were acquired at 24 hrs post administration of Dex-CeNP. Tissues were washed with cold PBS and then fixed in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde and 2 % paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) overnight at 4 °C. After subsequent buffer washes, the samples were fixed with 2 % osmium tetroxide for 1 hr at room temperature. After 1 hr, samples were rinsed with DI water prior to en bloc staining with 2 % uranyl acetate. Next, samples were dehydrated using graded ethanol series. The tissue was then infiltrated and embedded in EMbed-812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). The embedded tissue samples were sectioned using a DiATOME diamond knife. Thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined with a JEOL 1010 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histology and TEM Analysis of BAT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were fixed in 4% PFA overnight, washed in PBS, dehydrated in ethanol, paraffin-embedded and sectioned. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Images were captured on a Keyence inverted microscope. For transmission electron microscopy, BAT was fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) overnight at 4°C. Thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and analyzed with a JEOL 1010 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histology and TEM Analysis of BAT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were fixed in 4% PFA overnight, washed in PBS, dehydrated in ethanol, paraffin-embedded and sectioned. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Images were captured on a Keyence inverted microscope. For transmission electron microscopy, BAT was fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) overnight at 4°C. Thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and analyzed with a JEOL 1010 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Colonic Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was collected from the ascending colon of 5 animals from each group (controls and OB treated rats/each dose for each experimental set). We used colonic strips, 1 mm×3 mm long. These strips were immediately cut after the excision and fixed for 6 h in a solution of 2% glutaraldehyde 0.1 M in cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). After four rinses in the cacodylate-buffered solution containing 0.22 M sucrose, the strips were post-fixed for 1 h in 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M PBS. Dehydration was carried out in graded ethanol and the strips were then embedded in Epon using flat moulds to obtain sections with the circular muscle cut in cross-section. Semi-thin sections, obtained with a LKB-NOVA ultramicrotome (Stockholm, Sweden), were stained with a solution of toluidine blue in 0.1 M borate buffer and then observed under a light microscope to select areas away from the strip edges and with no apparent signs of mal-fixation or processing artefacts. Ultra-thin sections of these selected areas were obtained with the LKB NOVA ultramicrotome using a diamond knife and stained with a saturated solution of uranyl acetate in methanol (50∶50) per 12 min at 45°C, followed by an aqueous solution of concentrated bismuth subnitrate per 10 min at RT. At least 10–20 ultra-thin sections from all four strips of each animal were examined under a JEOL 1010 electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan) and photographed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of ApoE-/- Murine Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW 264.7 cells and aorta samples from treated ApoE−/− mice were prepared for TEM imaging using standard preparation techniques.67 (link) Cells and tissue were fixed in 2% PFA and 2.5% glutaraldehyde before staining and embedding. Samples were cut into 60 nm thick sections and mounted onto grids before viewing with a JEOL 1010 Electron Microscope at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the indicated treatments, 2.0 × 107 cells were fixed in a 2% glutaraldehyde solution for 30 min, post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 10 min, dehydrated with acetone, and embedded in Epon. Thin sections were cut and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The sections were examined with a JEOL 1010 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Bladder Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens of urothelium plus lamina propria and specimens of detrusor plus lamina propria were fixed in Karnowsky (paraformaldehyde 8% in distilled water and 0.2 M PBS containing 0.055 g/l NaPO4 and 0.04 M Lysine, added with 0.5% glutaraldehyde) ON at 4°C, and then post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PBS for 2 hrs at 4°C, dehydrated in graded series of acetone and embedded in Epon by using flat moulds. Semi-thin sections were obtained with a LKB NOVA ultra-microtome (Stockholm, Sweden), stained with a solution of toluidine blue in 0.1 M borate buffer and observed under a light microscope to check the presence of urothelium and detrusor muscle, respectively. Ultra-thin sections (50/60 nm thick) of the selected areas were obtained with the same ultra-microtome by using a diamond knife and stained with an alcoholic solution of uranyl acetate in methanol (50:50) per 12 min. at 45°C, followed by an aqueous solution of concentrated bismuth subnitrate per 10 min. at RT. At least 10–20 ultra-thin sections from all four samples of each animal were examined under a JEOL 1010 electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan) and photographed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tissue Preparation for Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anesthetized mice were transcardially perfused with 2% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). DRG and cervical spinal cords were dissected, and fixed for at least 4 more hours at 4 °C. The tissues were osmicated, dehydrated, infiltrated, and then embedded in Embed 812 mixture (Electron Microscopy Sciences) as previously described72 (link). For light microscopy, cross-sections were cut at a thickness of 1 μm on an American Optical Reichert Ultracut Ultra microtome, and stained with alkaline toluidine blue. For electron microscopy, cross-sections were cut at a thickness of 90 nm, and stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate. The ultra-thin sections were imaged using a JEOL 1010 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunodetection of Dermatan Sulfate on Collagen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the reactivity of the antibody for dermatan sulfate on collagen fibrils, immuno-electron microscopy was performed on lowicryl HM20 embedded rat kidney samples21 (link). The tissue was incubated for 3 h in Somogyi solution [0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) containing 4% formaldehyde, 0.05% glutaraldehyde and 0.2% picric acid]22 (link). After cutting, 200 μm sections were frozen in liquid propane at −190 °C. Using freeze-substitution (Leica-KF80) the sections were embedded in lowicryl HM20. Ultrathin sections were mounted on nickel grids. For immunostaining sections were blocked with 0.25% BSA in phosphate buffered saline (BSA/PBS), followed by an overnight incubation at 4 °C with antibody GD3A12 (5× diluted periplasmic fraction in BSA/PBS). After washing, bound GD3A12 was visualized using 10 nm gold-sphere labeled protein A (1:400 in BSA/PBS) prepared according to Slot et al.23 (link). Subsequently, sections were washed in PBS, post-fixed for 5 min in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), washed with distilled water, and post-stained with uranyl acetate. Sections were examined using a JEOL 1010 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!