The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using lt07 118

1

Generation and Quality Control of hiPSC Line

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human induced pluripotent stem cell line (hiPSC) SB Ad3.1 was previously generated and obtained through the IMI/EU sponsored StemBANCC consortium via the Human Biomaterials Resource Centre, University of Birmingham (http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/hbrc). Human skin fibroblasts were obtained from a commercial source (Lonza CC-2511, tissue acquisition number 23447). They had been collected from a Caucasian donor with no reported diabetes with fully informed consent and with ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Service South Central Hampshire research ethics committee (REC 13/SC/0179). The fibroblasts were reprogrammed to pluripotency as previously described44 (link) and were subjected to the following quality control checks: SNP-array testing via Human CytoSNP-12v2.1 beadchip (Illumina #WG-320-2101), DAPI-stained metaphase counting and mFISH, flow cytometry for pluripotency markers (BD Biosciences #560589 and 560126), and mycoplasma testing (Lonza #LT07-118).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Generation and Quality Control of hiPSC Line

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human induced pluripotent stem cell line (hiPSC) SB Ad3.1 was previously generated and obtained through the IMI/EU sponsored StemBANCC consortium via the Human Biomaterials Resource Centre, University of Birmingham (http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/hbrc). Human skin fibroblasts were obtained from a commercial source (Lonza CC-2511, tissue acquisition number 23447). They had been collected from a Caucasian donor with no reported diabetes with fully informed consent and with ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Service South Central Hampshire research ethics committee (REC 13/SC/0179). The fibroblasts were reprogrammed to pluripotency as previously described44 (link) and were subjected to the following quality control checks: SNP-array testing via Human CytoSNP-12v2.1 beadchip (Illumina #WG-320-2101), DAPI-stained metaphase counting and mFISH, flow cytometry for pluripotency markers (BD Biosciences #560589 and 560126), and mycoplasma testing (Lonza #LT07-118).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Line Characterization and Use

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell line HEK-293T (Homo sapiens), ATCC, cat no. CRL-3216, cells were used by passage 7 in all experiments for this paper, mycoplasma-free (Lonza, LT07-118, control: LT07-518). The cell line NIH-3T3 (Mus muscles), ATCC, cat no. CRL-1658, used by passage 5 in all experiments for this paper, mycoplasma-free (Lonza, LT07-118, control: LT07-518)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Generation and Characterization of hiPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Written informed consent for patient participation was obtained by a qualified investigator (protocol 12-N-0095 approved by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health). α-Dystroglycanopathy patient hiPSCs were reprogrammed from dermal fibroblasts using an hOKSML mRNA reprogramming kit (Stemgent, 00-0067). Control-1 hiPSCs were reprogrammed in the same manner from BJ foreskin fibroblasts (ATCC, CRL-2522). Immunocytochemical validation of germ layer differentiation was performed off-site (Stemgent). Control-2 hiPSCs were reprogrammed from control foreskin fibroblasts (ATCC, CRL-2097) using the CytoTune-iPS 2.0 Sendai reprogramming kit (Thermo Fisher, A16517). Control-3 hiPSCs (NC15) were previously generated by lentiviral reprogramming of adult dermal fibroblasts (Grunseich et al., 2014 (link)). Karyotype analysis was performed after at least 10 passages (WiCell), and all cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination (LT07-118, Lonza).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Human Gastric Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human gastric cancer cell lines were obtained from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) core facility (BROAD Institute, Cambridge), which obtained them directly from commercial sources and authenticated the lines using standard short tandem repeat analysis. RPE and MDA-MB-468 cells were obtained from ATCC. RPE1 cells were grown in DMEM-F12 (Life Technologies, #10565042) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, HGC27 cells were grown in DMEM (Life Technologies, #11965118) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. AGS, KE39, GSU, NUGC3 and MDA-MB-468 were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, #11875119) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells lines were maintained in humidified 37 °C the incubator with 5% CO2 and routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination (Lonza #LT07-118).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Routine Culture of CHO Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For routine cell culture, CHO cells (ATCC #CCL-61) were cultured in 100 mm cell culture dishes (Corning Falcon #353003) at 37 °C, in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 in F-12K medium (Kaighn’s modification of Ham’s F-12 medium, ATCC #30-2004) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco #16140-071) and penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 U/ml) (Gibco #15140122). Cells were obtained from ATCC, and routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination (Lonza #LT-07-118).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Organoid-Based Niraparib Sensitivity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organoids were established from tumors collected and processed under IRB approval from both participating institutions University of Pittsburgh and the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Organoid lines were generated from tumors following Sachs et al.’s protocol69 (link) with the addition of estradiol supplementation for ER+ tumors. Established organoids were dissociated into single cells and seeded in organoid media with 5% of Cultrex® Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Matrix, type 2 (BME, Trevigen, 3533-001-02) for the intervention experiment. 24hrs after seeding, organoids were treated with vehicle or niraparib (N = 4–8). Cell viability was measured 7 days post-treatment using CellTiter-Glo® 3D Cell Viability assay (Promega). MDA-MB-436 (ATCC) cells were utilized as positive control. Cells used were authenticated (SourceBioScience) and regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination (LT07-118, Lonza).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MCF7 cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in Minimum Essential Medium Eagle (MEM) (M2279, Sigma) supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine (G7513, Sigma) and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (F7524, Sigma). The LY2 cells were a gift from Robert Clarke (Georgetown, USA) and were cultured as previously described [17 (link)]. Each cell line was tested for mycoplasma contamination (LT07-118, Lonza) and genotyped (Source BioScience) according to ATCC guidelines. T347 cells were derived from an ER+ PR− HER2+ brain metastatic tumour from a breast cancer patient as previously described [18 (link)]. AI resistant LetR cells were generated as previously described [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gastric Cancer Cell Line Culturing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human gastric cancer cell lines were obtained from the CCLE core facility (BROAD Institute, Cambridge), which obtained them directly from commercial sources and authenticated the lines using standard short tandem repeat analysis. RPE1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). RPE1 cells were grown in DMEM-F12 (Life Technologies, #10565042) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. HGC27 cells were grown in DMEM (Life Technologies, #11965118) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. AGS, GSU, KE39, and NUGC3 were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, #11875119) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells lines were maintained in a humidified 37°C incubator with 5% CO2 and routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination (Lonza #LT07-118).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Culture and Characterization of Prostate Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human prostate tumor cell line CW22Rv1 (22Rv1) was purchased from ATCC and grown in RPMI-1640 supplemented with either 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) or 3% charcoal-stripped FBS (for palmitic acid and cholesterol treatment where indicated), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all components from Thermo Fisher). Human androgen-refractory prostate cancer cells of the ARCaPM cell line were gifted to us from Leland Chung (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), and grown in DMEM, supplemented with 5% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin [24 (link)].
Human primary fibroblasts were grown from prostatectomy specimens at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center or the Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs under their respective institutional review boards [42 (link)]. The tumor-inductive status of fibroblasts was determined by tissue recombination with BPH1 (a non-tumorigenic human prostate epithelial cell line, as previously described [32 (link)]). CAF was cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 5% FBS, 5% Nu-Serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 10−9 M testosterone (Sigma-Aldrich), and 4 μg/mL insulin (12585014, Fisher Scientific). All cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. All cells were tested for mycoplasma (LT07118, Lonza, Rockland, ME, USA) every 1 month and were negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!