The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using lsm700 axio examiner z 1 confocal microscope

1

Quantifying Bacterial Penetration of Gut Mucus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial penetration of the inner mucus layer was scored using the fluorescence-in situ-hybridization (FISH)-, anti-Muc2- and DNA-stained sections as described previously (S2 Table) [28 (link)]. The mucus layering score, focusing solely on the layering and structure of the inner, stratified mucus layer and the goblet cell filling score [16 (link)] were applied (S3 Table and S4 Table, respectively). Sections were scored independently by two blinded individuals, except for the naive controls which were scored by one blinded individual using the Eclipse E1000 and Eclipse90i (Nikon) fluorescence microscope as well as the Axiovert 200M microscope (Zeiss) with the EXFO X-Cite 120 Fluorescence Illumination System (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany). Micrographs were obtained using the LSM700 Axio Examiner Z.1 confocal microscope (Zeiss) with the ZEN 2010 software (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Staining of Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue specimens were washed in cold PBS, fixed in 10% formalin buffered saline for 2 hr, followed by incubation in 30% sucrose overnight. Tissue specimens were embedded in optimal tissue cutting medium and 6-µm-thick section were cut. Sections were rinsed in PBS followed by antigen retrieval in 0.05% citraconic anhydride (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), permeabilized in 0.05% Triton X-100 or 0.05% saponin (TGN46) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), washed in PBS, and blocked in 5% goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Sections were incubated with primary antibodies toward EEA1, Rab7 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), Lysozyme, TGN46 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), Rab3D (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), LAMP1, Calnexin (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), or VAMP-8 (gift from Prof Burton Dickey, University of Texas) at 4°C overnight, rinsed with PBS and incubated with goat anti rabbit or goat anti chicken Alexa Fluor conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at room temperature for 1 hr. Sections were counterstained with DAPI and imaged using an Axioskop 2 microscope, an LSM700 Axio Examiner Z1 confocal microscope, or an LSM900 with Airyscan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY). Acquired images were analyzed using Zen (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY) and Imaris (Bitplane, Belfast, Great Britain) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mucus Penetrability Assay for Colon Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mucus penetrability assay was performed on distal colon tissue as previously described [16 (link),37 (link)]. Briefly, the colonic explants were mounted in the perfusion chamber with basolateral Kreb’s glucose solution containing 1μg/ml Calcein violet tissue stain (CellTrace Calcein Violet, Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher) and a suspension of far red fluorescent beads (FluoSpheres Carboxylate-Modified Microspheres, 1.0 μm, red fluorescent (580/605), 2% solids, Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher) and Kreb’s mannitol solution was added to the apical side and allowed to sediment for 5 min before it was refilled with Kreb’s mannitol solution. The distribution of the beads in the mucus was investigated by acquiring confocal images in XY stacks (320 x 320 μm) 30min after tissue mounting. These were obtained using a LSM700 Axio Examiner Z.1 confocal microscope with Plan-Apochromat x 20/1.0 DIC water objective (Zeiss) and the ZEN 2010 software (Zeiss). Average bead distance from the tissue surface was calculated by combining bead fluorescence intensity data for each z-plane above the tissue surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spatial Transcriptomics of Gut Muscarinic Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SI and distal colon tissue specimens were dissected, fixed for 16 hr in 4% formaldehyde, followed by overnight incubation in 30% sucrose. Tissue specimens were embedded in optimal cutting medium, frozen, and 6 µm thick sections were cut. Cut sections were washed in PBS, followed by single molecule in situ hybridization of Chrm1 (probe: 483441-C2), Chrm3 (probe: 437701), or Chrm4 (probe: 410581-C2) according to manufacturer’s instructions RNAscope fluorescent reagent kit v2 (ACD, Bio-Techne, Abingdon, United Kingdom) visualized with Opal-570 (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA) or CF488A Tyramine (Biotium, Fremont, CA). Following the RNAscope protocol, tissue sections were stained with a primary antibody against Epcam (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) at 4°C overnight followed by incubation using a Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33528 and a subset of SI sections were stained with Alexa Fluor 555 conjugated WGA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and a subset of distal colon sections were stained with FITC conjugated UEA1 (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) to visualize GCs. Images were obtained by an LSM700 Axio Examiner Z1 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Intestinal Goblet Cell Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, FM 1–43FX was administered into the SI of ketamine/xylasine anesthetized mice. After 1 hr, mice were sacrificed and the SI was dissected, cut open along the mesenteric border, and washed with cold PBS before fixation in 10% formalin buffered solution for 2 hr, followed by incubation in 30% sucrose overnight. Tissues were embedded in OCT, and 6 μm sections were prepared. To evaluate the FM 1–43FX staining pattern in GC, sections were stained with Texas Red conjugated WGA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and DAPI to identify the nucleus, and imaged using an Axioskop 2 microscope. Images were analyzed using AxioVision (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY). To evaluate the FM 1–43FX staining pattern in GCs forming GAPs, FM 1–43FX and dextran-Alexa647 was administered into the SI lumen simultaneously. After 1 hr the mice were sacrified and tissue processes as described above. Tissue sections were stained with DAPI to identify the nucleus and imaged using an LSM700 Axio Examiner Z1 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY). Acquired images were analyzed using Zen (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY) and Imaris (Bitplane, Belfast, Great Britain) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunostaining and Imaging of Goblet Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded methanol-Carnoy-fixed sections were dewaxed, rehydrated and antigen-retrieved for immunostaining with different combinations of anti-Ido1 (Cell Signaling), anti-Epcam (Abcam), chicken monoclonal anti-Defa24, raised against a well characterized peptide(54 (link)), anti-Lysozyme (Genway) or anti-apoMUC2 (detecting the nonO-glycosylated mucin) antibodies (PH497 and PH1900 for mouse and human respectively (55 (link), 56 (link)). Bacterial FISH was performed as previously described (57 (link)) with counterstaining using fluorescently conjugated lectins. For RNA-in situ hybridization we used the RNA scope technique (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) according to manufacturer’s instruction on formalin-fixed tissue sections. GCs in formalin-fixed whole-mounted tissue from mouse or human biopsies were stained by lectins or an anti-human apoMUC2 and counterstained with CellMask Deep Red plasma membrane stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In all cases, DNA was counterstained by Hoechst-34580 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were recorded with an LSM700 Axio Examiner Z.1 confocal microscope (Zeiss) and further processed using the Imaris software (Bitplane) or ImageJ v1.52k (58 (link)). Scoring criteria for GC shedding are given in table S9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!