The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Li 300

Manufactured by LI COR
Sourced in United States

The LI-300 is a compact and portable leaf area meter designed for accurate measurements of leaf area. It features a large LCD display, intuitive user interface, and built-in memory for storing measurement data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using li 300

1

Compound Analysis of Transplanted Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At transplant and three weeks after transplant (harvest), height from the substrate surface to the meristem, leaf area of two (seedling) or four (harvest) most recently fully expanded leaves (measured with LI-300; LI-COR Biosciences), stem diameter (harvest reps 2 and 3) at the base, and shoot fresh mass were recorded. Additionally, the number of branches >2.5 cm and node number (rep 2 and 3) were recorded at harvest. Tissue was placed in a forced-air oven maintained at 75°C for at least 3 d, weighed, and dry mass was recorded. Three weeks after transplant, the two most recent, fully mature leaves of five plants from each treatment were detached, frozen, and stored at -20°C until gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) analysis as reported in Walters et al. [25 (link)] from a method derived from [26 (link)] Schilmiller et al. Tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen, and compounds were extracted with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) with a tetradecane internal standard. Samples were analyzed using an Agilent 7890A GC and single quadrupole MS with 5975C inert XL MS detector (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Compound concentrations were normalized to the sample internal standard and leaf dry weight, then quantified using the standard calibration curves of 1,8 cineole, eugenol, linalool, and methyl chavicol with a tetradecane internal standard (Millipore Sigma; St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluation of Nutrient Quality in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 53 days after sowing, plants were harvested, and the leaf angle, leaf number, total leaf area, root length, leaf and root fresh weights, and leaf and root dry weights were measured. Total leaf area was determined using a leaf area meter (LI-300; Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA), and the dry weights of leaf and root were measured after oven-drying at 80°C for more than 72 h.
As a measure of the nutrient quality, the ascorbic acid and nitrate contents in the outer and inner leaves (all leaves in each group of layers were cut into pieces, and the 1 g fresh samples were used for measurements) of plants in each treatment were quantified by using an RQ Flex plus reflectometer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), following the method of Pantelidis et al. (2007) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biomass, Carbohydrates, and Leaf Area in Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five plants with average tillering number of each plot were harvested at heading and maturity stages in 2017 and 2018. Plant samples were separated into green leaves, stems, senescent organs, and panicles, and their dry weights were determined after oven-drying at 105 °C for 30 min and then at 85 °C to constant weight to calculate total biomass. The oven-dried samples of stem, which included culms and leaf sheaths, were used for determination of non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentrations (mg g−1 dry weight) according to the method reported previously by Fu et al. (2011) (link). The total mass of NSC stored in stems (g plant−1), apparent transferred mass of NSC from stems to grains during grain filling (g plant−1), and apparent ratio of transferred NSC from stems to grains (%) were calculated according to the method of Li et al. (2018a) (link). The total green leaf area of each plant was measured using a leaf area meter (LI-300, Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) in 2018. The leaf area index (LAI) was calculated by the ratio of the total green leaf area of each plant to the area of the ground covered (17 cm × 25 cm). We also measured the length and width of the flag and second leaves on the main stems in 2017 and 2018.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Plant Growth Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of experiment (60 days), plant height was measured from the base of the main stem from the soil surface to the tip of the uppermost shoot using a ruler, and the ground diameter was measured at the internode 1-cm above the ground with vernier calipers; these measurements were conducted on each seedling in all treatments. Roots were elutriated with water to remove soil. One intact plant (above-ground shoot and below-ground root) from five replicates per treatment was harvested for biomass determination. The dry mass, including roots, stems, and leaves was obtained after oven drying at 80°C until a constant mass. The leaf area (LA) was measured with a LA meter (LI-300, Li-Cor, Lincon, NE, USA). Leaf mass ratio (LMR) was calculated by leaf dry mass divided by total biomass for each plant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Leaf Growth Analysis of Clematis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After three months of the differential irradiance treatments, one intact plant from each replication of each treatment was selected to observe and record the growth conditions of the whole plant. The leaf samples of Clematis from all treatments were collected for growth analysis. The leaf mass was weighed by electronic scale, and the leaf area was measured by an LA meter (LI-300, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). The leaves were killed by keeping them at 105 °C for 15 min and then dried in an oven at 80 °C until they reached a constant dry weight. Specific leaf weight (SLM) was calculated by leaf dry mass divided by the leaf area for each plant25 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Leaf Growth Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six plants were harvested at 14, 28, and 35 DAS. Number of leaves, total leaf area, and leaf FW were evaluated. Total leaf area was determined using a leaf area meter (LI-300; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Then, plant tissues were dried at 80°C for a minimum of 72 h and the leaf DW was measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Monitoring Eucalyptus Pest Diversity in Brazil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were collected in commercial plantations of Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla during the period from January 2014 to January 2016 in the cities of Feliz Natal, Lucas do Rio Verde, Sorriso and Vera. In Feliz Natal (12º 20' 67" S, 55º 01' 06" W) and Vera (12º 19" 63" S, 55º 19' 01" W) the plantations were located in the border of the Highway MT 225; in Sorriso (12º 51' 98" S, 55º 52' 93" W) and Lucas do Rio Verde (12º 51' 22" S, 55º 52' 33" W) they were located in the border of Highway BR 163, in Mato Grosso State (Figure 1).
The areas were monitored with yellow sticky traps (10 × 12 cm), trademark BIOTRAP  and, light traps model "Luíz de Queiroz", with UV fluorescente lamp (black light), 15 watts, powered by 12-volt battery. All the sampled material was taken to the Laboratory of Energy and Pests from Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Institute of Federal University of Mato Grosso for screening, identification, and fixation of specimens. Collected leaves in the field were conducted to the laboratory, 40 apical, middle and basal leaves were sampled, in three-year-old plantations bordered by native forested fragment, eucalyptus plantation and crops (soybeans) in Feliz Natal City, to obtain the real leaf area and consumed, with the aid of the photoelectric meter Li-Cor Li-300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!