The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Polycarbonate membrane filter

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom

Polycarbonate membrane filters are a type of laboratory equipment used for filtration purposes. They are designed to effectively remove particulates, bacteria, and other contaminants from liquids or gases. The core function of these filters is to provide a reliable and consistent method of separation and purification for various applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

38 protocols using polycarbonate membrane filter

1

Viral DNA Extraction from Lake Water

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lake water samples were collected and filtered through 3.0 μm and 0.2 μm polycarbonate membrane filters (Millipore, MA, USA). 50 L of the filtrate was added to 2.5 mL of 10 g/L Fe Stock (FeCl3) Solution. After shaking and settling, the mixed water was filtered through 0.8 μm polycarbonate membrane filters (Millipore, MA, USA). The 0.8 μm polycarbonate membrane filters were stored at – 80°C (John et al., 2011 (link)).
The viral particles on the filters were resuspended in fresh 0.1 M EDTA-0.2 M MgCl2 buffer (pH 6.0) at 4°C. Viruses were concentrated by centrifugal ultrafiltration into 400 μL. The QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) was used to extract DNA from the concentrated solution following manufacturer handling instructions. Library construction and next generation sequencing of the viral DNA was carried out by Novogene (Nanjing, China) using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (pair-end sequencing, 2 × 150 bp). In this study, the RNA component of the viromes was not considered as only DNA was extracted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Nitrogen Fixation Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze nifH gene abundance, at most stations, 3–4 L (500 mL at station OA-5) of seawater from each one of the triplicate carboys was collected following the incubation by filtration under low vacuum pressure onto 47 mm 0.2 µm polycarbonate membrane filters (Millipore). At station OA-2, 4.5 L of the surface seawater was directly collected for nifH gene analysis without incubation. For Trichodesmium ppnK gene transcription analysis, 3–4 L of seawater was subsampled from the incubations at stations TM-3, TM-4, TM-5, OA-3, OA-4, and OA-5. All filters were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C until DNA/RNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tiaoxi River Water and Sediment Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initially, 25 sampling locations were selected covering the East and West, and junctions of the Tiaoxi River with other tributaries, extending to approximately 100 km of the mainstream river (Figure 1); samples were collected from these locations in three seasons (autumn 2014, winter, and summer 2015). Locations comprising domestic, agricultural, and industrial areas were selected for sampling and the land use pattern of the sampling locations was reported in our previous study (Vadde et al., 2018 (link)); the details are also provided in Supplementary Table S2. Water samples were collected in sterile 5 L polypropylene containers and sediments were collected using a sediment sampler; the samples in triplicate were transferred to sterile 50 ml tubes. Water and sediment samples were transported to the laboratory on ice and were processed within 8 h. Sediment samples were frozen at -20°C and the water samples (250 ml) were filtered through 0.22 μm polycarbonate membrane filters (Millipore, United Kingdom) and stored at -20°C prior to DNA extraction. The DNA was extracted from membrane filters (water samples) and sediment samples using PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Inc., Carlsbad, CA, United States) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Liposome Formulation and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All liposomes were made using
a 57:38:5 molar ratio of distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC) (Avanti
Polar Lipids), cholesterol (Sigma-Aldrich), and polyethylene glycol-2000-distearoyl
phosphoethanolamine (PEG–DSPE) (Avanti Polar Lipids). Ligands
conjugated to PEG–DSPE were included in the 5% PEG–DSPE.
To assemble the liposomes, chloroform solutions of DSPC, cholesterol
and PEG–DSPE were mixed together. Excess chloroform was evaporated
using N2 (g) and DMSO solutions of ligand–PEG–DSPE
were added to the dried liposome mixture. The liposomes were lyophilized
overnight then hydrated in PBS, pH 7.4 (Corning) to achieve a final
liposome concentration of 1–2 mM. To get the liposome mixtures
into solution, the mixtures were sonicated in a water bath 3×
for 30 s. Liposomes were extruded at room temperature using a miniextruder
(Avanti Polar Lipids) through polycarbonate membrane filters with
400 and 100 nm pore sizes (Millipore) 20 times each. Liposomes for
functional assays were purified over a Sepharose CL-4B column (Sigma-Aldrich)
upon extrusion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation and Characterization of LUVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of 10 mg/ml stock lipid solutions in chloroform were mixed and chloroform was removed under nitrogen stream; the mixtures were held thereafter in a vacuum desiccator overnight. The dried lipid mixtures were re-hydrated with 150 mM KCl, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 to a final concentration of 1 mM lipid for 60 min on ice with gentle agitation every 15 minutes. The lipid-buffer solutions were then vortexed for 30 seconds to fully homogenize the sample and passed through lipid extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.) using polycarbonate membrane filters (Millipore) with the pore sizes of 200 and 100 nm, sequentially. Liposomes’ size and polydispersity were determined for each lipid composition and preparation by light scattering using Zetasizer Nano-ZS90 (Malvern). Homogeneous populations of Large Unilamellar Vesicles (LUVs) of 100 ± 26 nm diameter with a polydispersity <0.2 were used in FCS measurements. The liposome diameter measured for each lipid sample was used in analyzing the FCS data from that sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Monitoring Water Quality Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water samples were collected quarterly at a depth of 10 cm below the surface at 9 sampling sites from April 2009 to January 2012 (Fig. 1). 100–300 mL water determined by algal concentration were filtered through 0.22-μm polycarbonate membrane filters (Millipore), and then immediately frozen at −20 °C until processing. TN, TP, SRP (soluble reactive phosphorus) and TDP (total dissolved phosphate) were measured following Chinese standard methods [18 ]. T (water temperature), DO (dissolved oxygen), and pH were obtained via a multi-parameter meter (YSI 6820, Yellow Spring Instruments, USA). SD (secchi depth) was measured with a 20-cm diameter black and white Secchi disk.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Seawater Metagenome Sampling and DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for metagenome analyses were collected from St. 301 (5 m deep) and St. 307 (5, 30, 150, and 750 m deep) in October 2019 (coordinates 43.155517 N 28.005383 E and 43.1696 N and 29.001283 E, respectively). Up to 6.9 L of seawater from each sampling depth were filtered through a series of 20 μm Nylon Net filters (Millipore), 5 μm polycarbonate membrane filters (Millipore), and 0.22 μm SterivexTM Filter Units (Merck). DNA was then extracted only from these Sterivex filters using standard phenol-chloroform protocol [43 (link)]. In short, Sterivex filters were treated with CTAB lysis buffer and then treated with 1 mg ml− 1 lysozyme and 0.2 mg ml− 1 proteinase K (final concentrations). Then nucleic acids were purified with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol and chloroform/isoamyl alcohol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Photosynthesis and Respiration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dark respiration and net photosynthetic oxygen evolution were measured in the middle of the light period within 3 h using a Clarke-type electrode (Hansatech, United Kingdom). Cells were harvested by filtering onto polycarbonate membrane filters (5 μm, Millipore, Germany) under gentle vacuum pressure (<0.01 MPa). These cells were then re-suspended in seawater buffered with 20 mM Tris–HCl with a final Chl a concentration of approximately 0.5 μg mL−1. The pH levels of the Tris buffered-medium were pre-adjusted by adding hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide to the same levels of the cultures (pH 7.83 for HC and 8.13 for AC), and the O2 levels were achieved by flushing the medium with pure N2. The resuspended cells were injected into an oxygen electrode vessel with a magnetic stirrer held in a water-jacked chamber (temperature controlled at 27°C) under the same level of light intensity. The respiration rate was estimated in darkness by covering the reaction chamber with aluminum foil. Photosynthetic O2 evolution was determined under growth O2 levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Amplicon Sequencing of Seawater Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 0 and day 10, a 500-ml seawater sample was collected from each bucket with or without the olivine addition. The collected seawater was firstly filtrated through a 20-μm nylon sieve and then sequentially filtrated through 3- and 0.2-μm pore size polycarbonate membrane filters (47-mm diameter; Millipore) for microbe collection at a negative pressure of <0.01 MPa. The bacteria that settled on the membrane filter of 3-μm pore size were defined as the particle-attached fraction (PA, 3–20 μm), while those that settled on the filter of 0.2-μm pore size were defined as the free-living fraction (FL, 0.2–3 μm). The DNA of bacteria from both the 3- and 0.2-μm filters were extracted using a DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Amplicon sequencing of the microbial community in the DNA extraction was performed by Tianjin Novogene Bioinformatic Technology Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). The PCR products of one replicate of the olivine-added group in surface seawater are not enough for sequencing, so this part of the data is excluded from the data processing. The V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S rDNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 341F (5′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3′) (Zhang et al., 2016 (link)), and sequencing was performed on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 pe250.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Estimating eDNA Shedding and Size Distribution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The eDNA was sampled using two different methods. The first method used a 47‐mm‐diameter glass microfiber filter GF/F (nominal pore size 0.7 μm; GE Healthcare Life Science, Little Chalfont, UK) to estimate eDNA shedding and decay rates, and the second method used a series of 47‐mm‐diameter polycarbonate membrane filters (pore size 10, 3, 0.8, and 0.4 or 0.2 μm; MILLIPORE, US) to estimate eDNA size distribution. Disposable gloves were worn when collecting water samples, and the outside of the sampling bottles was washed with tap water after the samples were collected. This was to prevent contamination during water sampling and filtration. The filtering devices (i.e., filter funnels [Magnetic Filter Funnel, 500 ml capacity; Pall Corporation, Westborough, MA, USA], plastic holders [ADVANTEC, Japan], nipple joints [ADVANTEC, Japan], hoses [TOYOX, Japan], 1‐L beakers, tweezers, and sampling bottles used for water sampling) were bleached after every use in 0.1% sodium hypochlorite solution for at least 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!