The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

112 protocols using salmon sperm dna

1

Nanosphere Characterization by DLS and FE-SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle size and surface charge of nanospheres were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS: Malvern Instruments, Southborough, Massachusetts). The morphology of the nanospheres was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE‐SEM: JEM‐7500F, Akishima, Japan). The enzymatic activity of DNase‐I pMNSs was confirmed via degradation of highly polymerized salmon sperm DNA (Sigma‐Aldrich, PA, USA) by gel electrophoresis.[18] For this, bMNSs, pMNSs, or DNase‐I pMNSs were incubated with 1 µg of salmon sperm DNA for 10 min at 37 °C, followed by gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sensitivity Assessment of Aversi_ITS Primers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the sensitivity of the use of the Aversi_ITS f/r primers for the HRM application, a serial dilution of gDNA of A. creber BCCM/IHEM 2646, A. sydowii BCCM/IHEM 20347 and A. versicolor IHEM 18884, defined as a reference by Libert et al. [13 (link)] for the performance assessment of the Aversi_ITS assay, was made and the limit of detection (LOD) was determined. A serial of 10 dilutions from 1000 to 0.01 pg (i.e., 1000, 500, 50, 10, 5, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01 pg) was analyzed in duplicate with 6 independent runs. To comply with the Precision Melt Supermix requirements on the minimum amount of DNA to be present in the well, all the dilutions were made in 10 ng deoxyribonucleic acid sodium salt from salmon testes i.e., salmon sperm DNA (Sigma-Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium). In each assay, a negative control (NTCsalmon sperm), i.e., 10 ng of salmon sperm DNA (Sigma-Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium) and NTC (composed of Gibco® DNase, RNase, Protease free pure water) were added. The LOD was determined as the lowest amount of gDNA where for at least 11 out of the 12 repetitions the amplicon (with the correct Tm) and the correct cluster (with confidence >95%) were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microinjection and Transgenesis in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One droplet of halocarbon oil was pipetted onto the injection pad (dried 2% agarose on a glass slide). Worms were picked into the oil droplet and gently pushed down so that they stick to the pad and are immobilized. Subsequently, the injection mix [20 ng·μL−1 rescue plasmid, 3.5 ng·μL−1 co‐injection marker plasmid pCFJ90 (Pmyo‐2::mCherry::unc‐54utr, expression causes red fluorescent pharynx), 75 ng·μL−1 salmon sperm DNA (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA)] was injected into the gonad of young adult worms using a Zeiss Axiovert S 100 injection microscope. After injection, the worms were washed off the injection pad using M9 buffer and put back on seeded 60 mm NGM plates to recover. The F1 generation was then screened for transformed worms expressing the co‐injection marker under the binocular fluorescence microscope. The F1 worms with a red pharynx were put on separate plates. These plates were then checked for inheritable expression (stable transgenic lines).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Silk Cocoon-Derived Keratinocyte Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Silk cocoons were supplied by a local farm (Fimo srl, Milano, Italy). Sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3), CaCl2, and formic acid (FA) were provided by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Salmon sperm DNA (double-stranded DNA, molecular weight = 5 × 103 g/mol, 23 base pairs) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Human keratinocytes (HaCaT cell lines) were purchased from I.Z.S.L.E.R. from the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna ‘Bruno Ubertini’ (Brescia, Italy). Cells were grown in 75 cm2 tissue flasks with DMEM medium supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10% FBS under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of ESRRa in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously22 (link) with following modifications. In brief, embryos injected with human ESRRa mRNA and raised to 36 hpf were dissociated into single cells and crosslinked in 1% formamide solution. Samples were sonicated with 35% amp for a total of 2 minutes using Epishear Probe Sonicator (Active Motif, USA) and then pre-cleared using 80 μl of protein A agarose slurry containing salmon sperm DNA (Merck Millipore Corp., USA) for 1 hour at 4 °C. Samples were spun and supernatants were divided equally into 2, each labelled as an antibody or a control. 40 ul of protein A agarose slurry was added to both samples and 1 μg anti-ESRRa antibody (Abcam, USA) was added only to the samples labelled as antibody. All the remaining steps were followed as described. Primer sequences for quantitative PCR are: esrra (F-5′AAACACCACCTCACCTGCACATATTG3′, and R-5′GTCAGAGCGTCGTT CTCTGGAAG3′), sox9b-1 (F-5′GTGTGAGATCAGAGTTAATAAAGGTCA3′ and R-5′CCCAGCCAATCACAGTCAGTTAGCA3′), sox9b-2 (F-5′ CTCCACACAGAAACACCAACTGACCC3′ and R-5′ TACGTGCAGAGTGGCGGCACGGT3′). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 software (International Business Machines Corp., USA). Values with p < 0.05 (indicated by asterisks) were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Daclatasvir, TAR, and VAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Daclatasvir and TAR were kindly provided from GLOBAL NAPI Pharmaceuticals (Giza, Egypt), while VAC was gifted from EVA Pharma Pharmaceuticals (6th October city, Egypt). Salmon sperm DNA, Tris–HCl and ethylenediamine were purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Potassium chloride crystals was purchased from the El-Nasr Company for Pharmaceutical Chemicals (Abozabaal, Egypt).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Protocol for Transcription Factor Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, 10 million cancer cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde and resuspended in lysis buffer. The cell lysate was sonicated on ice resulting in an average DNA fragment length of 500 bp. After centrifugation, immunoprecipitation was performed in ChIP dilution buffer overnight in the presence of IgG, H3K9me3, and GATA3 antibodies with agitation. The protein A agarose/Salmon Sperm DNA (Merck Millipore) slurry was added and incubated for 2 to 4 h at 4°C with agitation. The antibody-agarose complex was centrifuged and washed five times, and the immunoprecipitated fraction was eluted. The cross-linking was reversed by incubation at 65°C for 4 h. The DNA was recovered by phenol/chloroform extraction and precipitated, and the abundance of specific sequence was measured by qRT-PCR using the corresponding primer sequences (Supplementary Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ChIP Assay Protocol for Protein-DNA Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assay was performed as described previously 8 (link). 2.5 X 106 (link) cells were taken for ChIP assay. The whole cell extract was pre–cleared using 60 μl of Protein A/G PLUS – agarose beads (SCBT; sc–2003) and incubated overnight with anti–P53, anti–H3K4me3, anti–Wdr5, anti–RbBP5, anti–Ash2L or control IgG antibodies. 1 μg of antibody was used for 100 μg of total lysate. Protein G agarose beads pre–blocked with salmon sperm DNA (to reduce non–specific DNA binding) was purchased from Millipore, Saint Charles, MO, USA (#16–2001) and 60 μl of this solution was used for each immunoprecipitation. 10 % of chromatin from each sample was removed before immunoprecipitation and used for PCR amplification (input). Both Immunoprecipitated and whole cell extract (input) were treated with RNaseA, proteinase K and DNA were purified using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA; #69504). Quantitative real–time PCR was performed on this DNA to identify the amount of target sequence. The list of primers used is given in supplementary table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ChIP Assay Protocol for Protein-DNA Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assay was performed as described previously 8 (link). 2.5 X 106 (link) cells were taken for ChIP assay. The whole cell extract was pre–cleared using 60 μl of Protein A/G PLUS – agarose beads (SCBT; sc–2003) and incubated overnight with anti–P53, anti–H3K4me3, anti–Wdr5, anti–RbBP5, anti–Ash2L or control IgG antibodies. 1 μg of antibody was used for 100 μg of total lysate. Protein G agarose beads pre–blocked with salmon sperm DNA (to reduce non–specific DNA binding) was purchased from Millipore, Saint Charles, MO, USA (#16–2001) and 60 μl of this solution was used for each immunoprecipitation. 10 % of chromatin from each sample was removed before immunoprecipitation and used for PCR amplification (input). Both Immunoprecipitated and whole cell extract (input) were treated with RNaseA, proteinase K and DNA were purified using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA; #69504). Quantitative real–time PCR was performed on this DNA to identify the amount of target sequence. The list of primers used is given in supplementary table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histone H3K9me3 ChIP-Seq in 5-FU-Resistant Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Native chromatin was prepared from LS411N-5FU-R cells and digested with micrococcal nuclease to generate mononucleosomes using the Simple ChIP Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Cell Signaling) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Chromatin fragments were then incubated with anti-H3K9me3 antibody (Abcam) and the chromatin-antibody complexes were isolated using Protein A agarose and salmon sperm DNA (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ChIP DNA fragments were then prepared using the TruSeq ChIP Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina) and sequenced using High-Seq 2500. Sequence reads in the FASTQ format were generated by the Illumina pipeline CASAVA 1.8.2, and were analyzed using MACS 1.4.2 as described (36 (link)). Peaks were annotated using in-house scripts and genes that have a peak in a promoter were fed into Panther to perform functional analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!