The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

47 protocols using specord 205

1

Spectrophotometric Determination of p-Anisidine Value

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The p-AV was determined according to the official spectrophotometric method (AOCS Official Method Cd 18-90) [22 ]. From each oil sample prepared as described in Section 2.3.1, 2 g was taken. 25 mL of isooctane was added and shaken manually for a few seconds to homogenise. Immediately, the absorbance was read at 350 nm against an isooctane sample using a UV-VIS double-beam spectrophotometer (Specord 205; Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). From the previously prepared solutions, 5 mL were taken and placed in separate containers with 1 mL of 0.25% w/v p-anisidine/glacial acetic acid solution. After 10 min, the absorbance was read again at 350 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Specord 205; Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). The p-AV value was calculated using Equation (3): p-AV=25 × 1.2×A2A1W
where

A1—absorbance of oil samples dissolved in isooctane;

A2—absorbance of oil samples in isooctane and p-anisidine solution;

W—mass of sunflower oil samples (g).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antioxidant Activity Assessment of Fortified Cookies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method used was specified in the study of Floares et al., (2023) [34 (link)]. A total of 1 mL of extract and 2.5 mL of a DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) 0.03 mM solution were shaken. After 30 min at room temperature, the absorbance was read at 518 nm (Specord 205; Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). The results are presented in µgTROLOX/mL. The sample was analyzed in triplicate.
To assess the antioxidant activity of fortified cookies by the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) method, 0.5 mL of extracts were mixed with 2.5 mL of the FRAP solution [34 (link)]. After 30 min at 37 °C, the absorbance of samples was measured at 590 nm (Specord 205; Analytik Jena). A standard solution of FeSO4·7H2O (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KgaA) was used for the calibration curve. The regression equation was y = 2.3559x − 0.0189, R2 = 0.9986, and the coefficient of correlation was R2 = 0.9980. The results are expressed as µgFe2+/g. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Novel Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence spectra were recorded with a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer. The powder X-ray diffraction data were obtained on a Philips X’ Pert with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). FTIR spectra were collected on a Bruker VERTEX-70 spectrometer in the 4000 − 600 cm−1 region. The optical absorption spectra were measured on a UV-vis spectrometer (Specord 205, Analytik Jena) in the range of 200 to 600 nm. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE-400 NMR Spectrometer in d6-DMSO.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Cyclic Nucleotide Analogs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP, and the analogs 2-(6-aminohexylamino)adenosine- 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (2-AHA-cAMP), N6-(6-aminohexyl)adenosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (6-AH-cAMP), 8-(6-aminohexylamino)adenosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-AHA-cAMP), N2-(6-aminohexyl) guanosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (2-AH-cGMP), 8-(2-aminoethylthio)guanosine-3′,5′-monophosphate (8-AET-cGMP), 8-(6-aminohexylthio)guanosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-AHT-cGMP), 8-(2-[fluoresceinyl]aminoethylthio)adenosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-Fluo-cAMP), and 8-(2-[fluoresceinyl]aminoethylthio)guanosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-Fluo-cGMP; Biolog Life Science Institute, Bremen, Germany) were dissolved in 20 mM 3-morpholinopropane-1-sulfonic acid (MOPS; pH 7.0) and 150 mM NaCl, and concentrations were determined from UV spectra using a spectrophotometer (SPECORD 205; Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany).
The plasmid pRSETB-hRIα harboring the cDNA of the human PKA RIα was a kind gift of Susan S. Taylor (University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, U.S.A.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Antioxidant Capacity of Honey

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant capacity of the honey samples was determined according to Chen’s method [73 (link)] with minor modifications, using a 0.03 mM ethanolic solution of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). It is widely used to test the antioxidant capacity of foods, especially fruits, vegetables, juices, and even honey [74 (link),75 (link),76 (link),77 (link)]. A total of 1 mL of each prepared honey extract was taken, to which 2.5 mL of DPPH solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was added. The samples were shaken and then incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance was measured with a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (Specord 205; Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany) at 518 nm. An average value was calculated from the three measurements performed for each honey sample. The control was prepared under the same conditions, the difference being that, instead of the honey solution, the same volume of distilled water was used. The antioxidant activity of each sample was calculated as a percentage of the CSR (the p overof radical uptake capacity). CSR of the tested samples was calculated according to the following equation: CSR (%)=AcontrolAsampleAcontrol×100
where

Acontrol—the control absorbance values;

Asample—the absorbance values tested of the samples.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Baobab Flour Antioxidant Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baobab flour (BF) was acquired in the North of Benin, and wheat flour (WF) type 650 was acquired at the Profil supermarket, Timisoara (Romania).
The reagents used were DPPH solution and HCl (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Ethyl alcohol (SC Chimreactiv SRL, Bucharest, Romania), Folin-Ciocâlteu reagent (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany), and Na2CO3 (Geyer GmbH, Renningen, Germany). The equipment used in the study was Specord 205 (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany), Chopin Mixolab (Chopin Technologies, Paris, France), the Varian 220 FAA spectrophotometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA), and Thermostat INB500 (Memmert GmbH, Schwabach, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hemolysis Inhibition Assay for Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The heat-induced haemolysis assay was conducted in accordance with the method developed by Okoli et al. [25 (link)], with some modifications exposed by Gunathilake et al. [24 (link)]. Briefly, different concentrations of essential oil (10 µL/mL, 20 µL/mL, 40 µL/mL, 80 µL/mL, 160 µL/mL) were suspended in 5 mL of PBS isotonic solution (RemedLab, Bucharest, Romania) at pH 7.4, over which 100 µL red blood cell suspension was added. After delicate shaking, the samples were incubated in a water bath at 54 °C for 20 min. The samples were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 3 min at the end of the incubation period, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Specord 205; Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). The negative control sample consisted of PBS and 100 µL erythrocyte suspension. The positive control sample consisted of 0.1 mg/mL of dexamethasone diluted in 5 mL of PBS and 100 µL erythrocyte suspension.
Formula (5) was used to determine the percentage of haemolysis inhibition: % inhibition of haemolysis=100A1A2100
where:

A1 represents the absorbance of the tested sample

A2 represents the absorbance of the negative control.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nisin Preparation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nisin was prepared according to the method developed at the Department of Biotechnology and Food Microbiology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, using Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (ATCC 11,454). All details regarding preparation and concentration analyses of nisin were reported previously by Józefiak et al. (2013 (link)). The nisin activity expressed in international units (IU) was measured by a spectrophotometer (model Specord 205, Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany), and the results were compared to a commercially available nisin standard (Sigma, 1,000 IU/mg of solid) and converted into IU by equivalent (1 μg of nisin corresponds to 40 IU).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenolic Content Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total phenolics content was determined according to Folin–Ciocalteu modified method [73 (link)]. An amount of 0.5 mL extract was treated with 1.25 mL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, München, Germany) diluted 1:10 with distilled water. The sample was incubated for 5 min at room temperature, then 1 mL Na2CO3 (Geyer GmbH, Renningen, Germany) (60 g/L aqueous salts) was added. The samples were incubated for 30 min at 50 °C in an INB500 thermostat, Memmert GmbH, Schwabach, Germany) after reading absorbance at 750 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Specord 205; Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). As a reference, ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used. The calibration curve was obtained using gallic acid (concentration range: 2.5–250 μg/mL). The results were expressed in mg GAE per g of dry matter (d.m.). All determinations were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Laccase-mediated Malachite Green Decolorization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the effect of mediator on decolorization of malachite green by laccase, 20 U/ml of the enzyme was added to 50.0 ml of the dye solution (100 mg/l, pH 5.5) with and without 1 mM HBT and kept at 30 °C, 150 rpm for 36 h. Decolorization of Malachite green was recorded spectrophotometrically at 619 nm (λmax for malachite green) using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Analytik-Jena Specord 205). The control sample containing citrate phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) in place of enzyme was run in parallel. The percentage of decolorization was calculated as follows: Percentage of decolorization%=Ac-At/Ac×100 where, Ac is the absorbance of the control and, At is the absorbance of the test sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!