The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

120 protocols using gentamicin

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, adhering to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [26 ]. The selection of antibacterial disks was based on CLSI 2022 recommendations and availability. The bacterial inoculum, equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standards, was uniformly spread onto Mueller–Hinton agar plates (Himedia India) using a sterile cotton swab applicator. Antibiotic disks for gram-positive bacteria were penicillin G (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), and clindamycin (30 μg) (Himedia, India).
The antimicrobial disks for Enterobacteriaceae included piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), amoxicillin-clavulanate (20/10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), cefepime (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), and ceftriaxone (30 μg) (Himedia, India). Antimicrobial disks for Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter were gentamicin (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and amikacin (30 μg) (Himedia, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling in Enterococcus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was done by Kirby-Bauer Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (disc diffusion method) using Mueller-Hinton agar [15 ]. Six different antibiotics were tested and the zone size was measured. Amikacin, streptomycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, and neomycin (obtained from HiMedia, India) were taken and screening test for detection of high level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) in Enterococcus species was confirmed as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) approved standards [16 ] The E. coli isolates were described as isolates with high level aminoglycoside resistance considering growth ≥2048 μg/mL for streptomycin, ≥512 μg/mL for gentamicin, ≥512 μg/mL for neomycin, ≥256 μg/mL for tobramycin, ≥256 μg/mL for netilmicin, and ≥256 μg/mL for Amikacin. MICs were determined by Etest (AB Biodisk).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Klebsiella pneumoniae Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolates were identi ed by gram stain, standard biochemical methods (urease test, indole test, and carbohydrates fermentation test, motility test, and citrate utilization test) [37] [38], and by K. pneumoniae species-speci c primers (Table 1) targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done by the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar using the following antibiotics; cipro oxacin (5mcg), gentamicin (10mcg), ceftazidime (30mcg), imipenem (10mcg), and chloramphenicol (30) (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, India) [39] . E. coli ATCC 25922 and K. pneumonia (ATCC 700603) were used as quality control strains.
Capsule stain was used to detect capsule [40] . String test was used to differentiate between hvKp and cKp strains: if the grown colonies of K. pneumoniae form a string >5 mm in length using a sterile loop, this demonstrates the hypermucoviscosity phenotype [41] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility tests of all isolates were performed using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton Agar with recommended antibiotics by CLSI 2020 guidelines [14 ].The antibiotics used were gentamicin (GEN,30 µg), amikacin (AK, 10 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), cefepime (CPM, 30 µg), aztreonam (AT, 30 µg), imipenem (IPM, 10 µg), piperacillin (PI,30 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIT), meropenem (MRP, 10 µg), ofloxacin (OF, 30 µg), Levofloxacin (LEV, 30 µg) and colistin (CL,10 µg) from Hi-Media, Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. India.
Isolates that were non-susceptible to at least one agent in ≥ 3 antimicrobial categories have been categorized under MDR [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Virulent Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolates positive for at least one virulence marker gene by PCR were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility test against the selected antimicrobials (ampicillin-10 μg, amikacin-10 μg, chloramphenicol-30 μg, ceftriaxone-10 μg, cephalexin-30 μg, ciprofloxacin-10 μg, co-trimoxazole-25 μg, cefoperazone-tazobactam-75 + 10 μg, meropenem-10 μg, norfloxacin-10 μg, gentamicin-10 μg, cefixime-5 μg, doxycycline hydrochloride-10 μg and ofloxacin-5 μg) (HiMedia, India) by disc diffusion method in Mueller–Hinton agar [18 (link)]. The performance of this test was checked by employing E. coli ATCC 25922 as a standard quality control strain. The results were expressed as sensitive, intermediate and resistant as per standard CLSI guidelines [19 ]. MDR was defined as “acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories” [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Activity of Honey against E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of honey samples against E. coli was determined by the disc diffusion method described by Bauer et al. at the honey concentration of 700 mg/disc [49 (link)]. Briefly, bacterial colonies were isolated from pure culture and inoculated in 5 mL of tryptic soy broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), then incubated at 37 °C for 2–5 h [49 (link)]. The optical density (O.D) was measured spectrophotometrically and adjusted between 0.08 and 0.1 at 600 nm, which was approximately equal to 108 CFU/mL (corresponding to 0.5 McFarland standard) [48 ,50 (link)]. Subsequently, bacterial suspension was spread evenly on an agar plate by a sterile cotton swab. Sterile 6.0 mm diameter blank discs (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) were impregnated with 50 µL of the honey concentration and vehicle as a negative control separately, then placed on the surface of the inoculated plate using sterile forceps. Gentamicin 10 µg/disc (Himedia, Mumbai, India) was used as a positive reference control. The plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. The inhibition zone diameter was measured in mm, and the average was calculated. The experiment was repeated in triplicates for each isolate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro antibiotic sensitivity patterns of the isolates were conducted as per the method of Bauer et al., (1966) . Antibiotics disc (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India) used in the present study were Amikacin (30 mcg), Amoxyclav (30 mcg), Ampicillin (10 mcg), Ciprofloxacin (5 mcg), Colistin (10 mcg), Ceftriaxone (30 mcg), Erythromycin (15 mcg), Enrofloxacin (10 mcg), Gentamicin (10mcg), Neomycin (30 mcg), Penicillin-G (10IU), Streptomycin (10 mcg), Sulphadiazine (300 mcg) and Tetracycline (30 mcg). Diameters of the clear zone of inhibition were measured and the interpretation of the results was made in accordance with the instructions supplied by the manufacturer (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India). Multiple Antibiotic resistance index (MARI) were also determined for each isolates by dividing the number of antibiotics to which the isolate is resistant to by the total numbers of antibiotics tested (Adenaike, 2016) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All E. coli isolates were tested for antibiotics susceptibility by using the disk diffusion method as reported by Kirby-Bauer [18 (link)]. Briefly, isolates were suspended in sterile 0.85% normal saline and adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard solution. Then, MHA plates were inoculated, and antibiotic disks were seeded within 15 min after inoculation of MHA plates. MHA plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 16–18 h. The interpretations of zones of inhibitions were performed as recommended by the CLSI 29th Edition guidelines [19 ]. All E. coli that showed intermediate susceptibility to the antibiotics tested were regarded as resistant to such particular antibiotics. Antibiotics tested included ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 μg; HiMedia, Mumbai, India), ampicillin (AMP 10 μg; HiMedia, India), tetracycline (TE 30 μg; HiMedia, India), meropenem (MEM 10 μg; HiMedia, India), ceftazidime (CAZ 30 μg; HiMedia, India), gentamicin (CN 10 μg; HiMedia, India), cefepime (FEP 30 μg; HiMedia, India), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT 25 μg; HiMedia, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of CTX-M Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility of blaCTX-M harbouring parent strains as well as transformants were determined by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method and results were interpreted as per CLSI guidelines [17 ]. Following antibiotics were tested: cefotaxime (30μg), cefoxitin (30μg), ceftazidime (30μg), amikacin (30μg), gentamicin (10μg), kanamicin (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), trimithoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75μg), imipenem (10μg), ertapenem (10μg), tigecycline (15μg) and polymyxin B (300 units) (Hi-Media, Mumbai). MIC was also determined for donor strain and transformants against cefotaxime, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India) by agar dilution method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amikacin (AMK; 30 μg/disk), ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM, 10/10 µg/disc), cefixime (CFM; 5 µg/disc), cefotaxime (CTX; 30 µg/disc), ceftazidime (CAZ; 30 µg/disc), ceftriaxone (CRO; 30 µg/disc), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg/disc), gentamicin (GEN, 10 µg/disc), imipenem (IPM, 10 µg/disc), meropenem (MEM; 10 µg/disc), nitrofurantoin (NIT; 300 µg/disc), sulbactam (SUL; 10 µg/disc), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT; 25 µg/ disc) (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai,. India), imipenem and sulbactam powder (Sigma-Aldrich Co. St. Louis, MO, USA). The antifungal powders were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stock solutions diluted based on Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI M07-A10).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!