The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using g3000pwxl

1

Molar Mass Distribution Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molar mass distribution of the liquid samples obtained by autohydrolysis was studied at least in duplicate. Analyses were performed in an Agilent 1100 equipment, with two columns in series, 300 × 7.8 mm TSKGel G2500PWXL and G3000PWXL from Tosoh Bioscience (Griesheim, Germany) and a PWX-guard column (40 × 6 mm). The operation conditions were: 70 °C using Milli-Q water at 0.4 mL/min as mobile phase. To evaluate the molar mass distribution, dextrans (1000–80,000 g/mol) (Fluka, St. Gallen, Switzerland were used as standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Murine Lens Protein Analysis by SEC-MALS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The murine lenses were homogenized, and water-soluble proteins were extracted as described previously [10 (link)]. The molecular weights of the extracted proteins were determined from the light scatter data, and the concentrations were calculated based on the refractive index data. In the studies involving water-soluble proteins from WT and knock-in mouse lenses, 100 μl of water-soluble lens proteins were separated in succession on G3000 PWXL and G5000 PWXL size exclusion chromatography columns (Tosoh Bioscience LLC, Prussia, PA) in line with the Viscotek TDA 302 triple detector array system, which measured UV absorption, refractive index (RI), multi-angle light scattering, and viscosity (Viscotek/Malvern). The GPC system was equipped with a VE-1122 pump and a VE-7510 degasser. The Viscotek OmniSEC software was used to calculate the molecular weight of the crystallin proteins using bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the 92-kDa Pullulan Malvern standards. The protein samples (100 μl) were injected onto the columns, and Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) Modified buffer (0.5x) without Ca2+ or Mg2+ was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min at 25°C. The protein concentration was calculated based on the refractive index using a dn/dc of 0.185 for both the BSA standard and the crystallin proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Molecular Weight Characterization of EPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPSEC (LC-20 AD, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a PDA detector (SPD-M20A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and RID-10 detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a TSK column (G3000PWXL, TOSOH, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the molecular weight distribution in EPS. Column temperature was maintained at 40 °C and it was calibrated using polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a standard. Milli-Q water was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1 and injection volume was 100 mL. In HPSEC chromatographs, UV254 signals intensity aims to detect protein content shown in red color line, while black line shows RID signals intensity, representing the polysaccharide components in EPS. The principle of HPSEC based on difference in retention times/intensity of the molecules which is characterized by size and concentration. Small molecules can penetrate the column of HPSEC chromatography quickly, while very large molecules penetrate the column slowly [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Weight Estimation of AH and WH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular weight of the AH and WH was estimated using the procedure described by Xu and Li [27 (link),28 ] by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) equipped with waters 2414 Refractive Index Detector (RID). The TSK-GEL columns (Tosoh Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) in series were G-5000 PWXL (7.8 mm × 300 mm) and G-3000PWXL (7.8 mm × 300 mm). The column was eluted with 0.02 mol/L KH2PO4 aqueous solution at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min and calibrated with the Dextran standards (average molecular weights of 5200; 11,600; 23,800; 148,000; 273,000; 410,000; and 668,000 g/mol). The temperature of the columns was maintained at 35 ± 0.1 °C. In each run, the volume of injection was 20 µL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determining Molecular Weight of OSDF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was carried out to determine the molecular weight of OSDF according to the protocol of Yang et al. (2019) (link). GPC was implemented using a Shimadzu LC-20 A liquid chromatography instrument (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with three tandemly linked G6000PWXL, G5000PWXL, and G3000PWXL columns (Tosoh Bioscience, Stuttgart, Germany). OSDFs were dissolved in deionized water and passed through a syringe filter (0.22 μm). A refractive index detector was used for monitoring. The mobile phase was 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Dextran standards with different molecular weights (5220, 11,600, 48,600, 147,600, 409,800, 667,800, 2,990,000 kDa) were applied for making the calibration curve. The molecular weight was calculated by retention time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of Water-Soluble Polysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clear juice (prepared as described in Section 2.2) was precipitated with 4 volumes of 80% ethanol, and the precipitate was freeze-dried to prepare water-soluble polysaccharide samples. The water-soluble polysaccharide samples were redissolved in deionized water, and filtered with 0.45 µm membrane. The molecular size distribution of the water-soluble polysaccharides was analyzed using a GPC system (Shimadzu LC-20AT) equipped with a refractive index detector (Kyoto, Japan). Samples were separated using Ultrahydrogel linear (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and G3000PWXL (Tosoh Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) columns. The elution buffer was 0.2 mol/L sodium nitrate at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Molecular Weight Determination of ZOP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular weight of ZOP was determined by high performance gel permeation chromatography (HPGPC) (13 (link)). It was equipped with TSK-GEL G5000PWXL (300mm × 7.8mm, i.d.) and G3000PWXL (300mm × 7.8mm, i.d.) gel columns in series (Tosoh Biosep, Japan) and a Waters 2414 refractive index detector (Massachusetts, USA). The samples were eluted at 0.6 mL/min flow rate with monopotassium phosphate solution as mobile phase. The T-series dextran was used as standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Molecular Weight Determination of APS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular weight of APS was determined by high-performance gel permeation chromatography according to the protocol of Afiya John et al. [23 (link)]. A Shimadzu LC-20 A liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was used in combination with three tandemly linked G6000PWXL, G5000PWXL, and G3000PWXL columns (Tosoh Bioscience, Stuttgart, Germany). A refractive index detector was used for monitoring. The column was eluted with 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Dextran standards with different molecular weights (5220, 11,600, 48,600, 147,600, 409,800, 667,800, 2,990,000 Da) were applied for making calibration curve. The molecular weight was calculated by using retention time (min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Weight Determination of Polysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of the ORPs–V solution was kept at 2.0 mg/mL and treated using a 0.45 μm membrane (Tianjin Jinteng Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), then injected into a high–performance gel permeation chromatographer (HPGPC) (Waters 2424, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The chromatography system consisted of an ultra–hydrogel linear gel filtration column (300.0 mm × 7.8 mm, G–3000 PWXL, Tosoh Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and a refractive index detector (RID). The elution was obtained with distilled water, and the calibration curve was built on the basis of dextran standards (13,050, 36,800, 64,650, 135,350, 300,600, and 2,000,000 Da) to determine the Mw [22 (link)]. Empower software (Waters Crop., Milford, MA, USA) was used to process the above results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histone-Induced α-Crystallin Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
α-Crystallin (50 µM) was incubated with increasing concentrations of histones: 0.0714, 0.143, 0.357, 0.536, 0.714, 1.071, 1.43, 1.79, and 2.14 μM (1, 2, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 μg/ml, respectively). The histone–α-crystallin mixtures were then filtered through 0.22-μm filters and water-soluble proteins were separated in succession on G3000 PWXL and G5000 PWXL size-exclusion chromatography columns (Tosoh Bioscience LLC, Prussia, PA) in line with the Viscotek TDA 302 triple-detector array system (Viscotek/Malvern) equipped with a VE-1122 pump and a VE-7510 degasser for measuring UV absorption, refractive index, right-angle light scattering (RALS), and viscosity. Viscotek OmniSEC software was used to calculate the molecular weights of the crystallin proteins using bovine serum albumin and the 92-kDa Pullulan Malvern standards. The protein samples (100 μl) were injected into the columns with 0.5× Dulbecco's modified PBS as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min at 37 °C. The protein concentrations were calculated on the basis of the refractive index using a dn/dc of 0.185 for both the bovine serum albumin standard and the crystallin proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!