The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using af942

1

Protein Isolation and SPARC Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was isolated using a single detergent lysis buffer as reported 12, 30, and protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). DMEM was conditioned by cells for 24 h as previously reported 19. Equal concentration of protein or volume of conditioned medium were evaluated by Western blotting as previously described 30 using anti‐mouse SPARC antibody (AF942, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Staining of Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adjacent serial sections were routinely stained with H&E, immunohistochemically stained for SPARC (1:200 for 45 min; AF942, R&D Systems), the cell proliferation marker Ki-67 (1:250 for 40 min; M7249, Dako), and the macrophage/histiocyte marker CD68 (1:200 for 30 min; MCA341R, Serotec) as previously reported (36 (link)). Additional adjacent sections were subjected to the periodic acid Schiff (PAS) reaction with or without diastase (liver tissue was positive control) as previously described (43 (link)) to demonstrate phagocytic activity (histiocytes). Images of stained sections were captured on either a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope with a Nikon DXM1200C digital camera using ImagePro 6.0 Plus (Media Cybernetics) software or a Nikon Eclipse Ni microscope with a Digital Sight DS-U3 digital camera using NIS-Elements AR 4.20 (Nikon) software. Composite figures were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS6 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemistry of Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were perfused by intracardial perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS. Brains were cut into 20 μm sections with a cryostat. Slides were rinsed three times in PBS for 10 min each, then incubated with blocking buffer (1% BSA, 5% normal goat or donkey serum, and 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Primary antibodies against Ki-67 (1:100 rabbit anti-Ki-67, Pierce #PA5-19462), Sparc (1:500 goat anti-Sparc, R&D Systems #AF942), or Sox9 (1:100 goat anti-Sox9, R&D Systems #AF3075) were incubated overnight at 4°C in the appropriate blocking buffer. After washing slides three times in PBS, secondary antibody (1:2000, donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 647 or goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488, Life Technology) was added for 2 h at RT. For EdU immunostaining, slides were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min at RT. The slides were then washed with 3% BSA in PBS twice for 5 min each. The reaction cocktail was added for 30 min at RT. The sections were rinsed once in BSA for 5 min before mounting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ECM Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used in this study: collagen I (600-401-103-0.1; Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA, USA), collagen IV (AB756P; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), collagen VI (SAB4500387; Sigma-Aldrich), fibronectin (ab23750; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), laminin (AB2034; EMD Millipore), and SPARC (AF942; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Sections were washed with xylene and subsequently hydrated with ethanol dilutions (100%, 95%, 70%) three times. Sections were then rinsed with deionized H2O. Tissue was then blocked in 10% donkey serum (all other antibodies) for 1 hour at RT and permeabilized using 0.2% Triton-100. Primary antibody was applied at 1:100 concentration overnight at 4°C. Slides were subsequently washed with 1× Phosphate Buffered Saline with Tween20 (PBS-T), and 1:200 secondary antibody was applied for 1 hour at RT (Table 1). Slides were washed once again, and the tissue was imaged using the Zeiss Axiovert 200M inverted fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss, Heidelberg, Germany) attached to a digital camera (AxioCam MR3; Carl Zeiss). Images were obtained using the associated software (Axiovision 4.8.2; Carl Zeiss). Slides of tissue from control and experimental interventions were imaged at the same time using the same control slide to normalize the intensity of staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological and Immunohistochemical Tissue Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adjacent serial sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), immunohistochemically stained for SPARC (1:200 for 45 minutes; AF942, R&D Systems), cell proliferation marker Ki‐67 (1:250 for 40 minutes; M7249, Agilent Technologies) and macrophage/histiocyte marker CD68 (1:200 for 30 minutes; MCA341R, BioRad, Los Angeles, CA, USA) as previously reported 36. Additional adjacent sections were subjected to the periodic acid Schiff (PAS) reaction with or without diastase (liver tissue was positive control) as previously described 43 to demonstrate phagocytic activity (histiocytes). Images of stained sections were captured on either a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope with a Nikon DXM1200C digital camera using ImagePro 6.0 Plus (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA) software or a Nikon Eclipse Ni microscope with a Digital Sight DS‐U3 digital camera using NIS‐Elements AR 4.20 (Nikon, New York, NY, USA) software. Composite figures were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS6 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Collecting SPARC-Depleted Conditioned Media

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conditioned media (CM) were collected from 4T1‐1F8 cells cultured for 72 hr in DMEM + 1% FBS. DMEM + 1% FBS served as control. CM were centrifuged, filtered (0.2 μm) and stored at −80°C until use. In some cases, CM were depleted of tumor‐cell secreted SPARC using goat anti‐SPARC (R&D AF942) coupled to protein‐G dynabeads (Thermo) by O/N incubation at 4°C under constant rotation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were harvested followed by snap freezing in liquid nitrogen, then homogenized in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors. Cell lysates were prepared by harvesting in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors. Equal amounts of protein were run on SDS-PAGE gels after quantification of protein concentration using the DC protein assay (Bio-Rad) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Primary antibodies and appropriate secondary antibodies were used to probe blots. The bands were detected by chemiluminescent visualization (PI32209; Pierce). The following primary antibodies were used for experiments. Antibodies to SPARC (1:1,000; AF942, R&D), β-actin (1:1,000; 4967L, Cell Signaling), p-AKT (1:1,000; 9271S, Cell Signaling), AKT (1:1,000; 9272S, Cell Signaling), PPARγ (1:200; sc-7273, Santa Cruz), p-HSL (S563) (1:1,000; 4139, Cell Signaling), HSL (1:1,000; 4107, Cell Signaling), IL-1β (1:1,000; GTX74034, Genetex), p-JNK (1:1,000; 4668S, Cell Signaling), JNK (1:1,000; 9252S, Cell Signaling), p-p38 MAPK (1:1,000; 4511S, Cell Signaling), p38 MAPK (1:1,000; 8690S, Cell Signaling), NF-kB p65 (1:1,000; 8242S, Cell Signaling), p-NF-kB p65 (1:1,000; 3033S, Cell Signaling), STAT1 (1:1,000; 9172S, Cell Signaling), and Caspase-1 (1:250; a gift from Genentech) were used. ImageJ was used for densitometry analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Secreted Protein Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was isolated using a single detergent lysis buffer as reported (12 (link), 30 (link)), and protein concentration was determined using the BCA protein assay (Pierce). DMEM was conditioned by cells for 24 hrs as previously reported (19 (link)). Equal concentration of protein or volume of conditioned medium were evaluated by Western blotting as previously described (30 (link)) using anti-mouse SPARC antibody (R&D Systems, AF942).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histological Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h and transferred to 70% ethanol. Tissues were embedded in paraffin and 4 μm sections were processed for H&E staining, picrosirius staining, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and co‐immunofluorescence (Co‐IF) using standard protocol as previously stated.18 The following antibodies were used: SPARC (R&D Systems, AF942, 1:100, Research Resource Identifiers (RRID): Antibody (AB)_2286625), α‐SMA (Dako, Clone 1A4, 1:250, RRID: AB_2335694), CC3 (Cell signalling, 9664L, 1:100, RRID: AB_2335694) CCL2 (Invitrogen, #MA5‐17040, Clone 2D8, 1:500, RRID: AB_2538512), CD45 (BD Biosciences, 550539, 1:100, RRID: AB_2174426).
Pictures were taken with 40x magnification for H&E and IHC staining and 20x magnification for Co‐IF staining. Olympus DP27 and Olympus confocal FV1000 cameras were used for visualization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!