The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jsm 7600f feg sem

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JSM-7600F FEG-SEM is a field emission scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) manufactured by JEOL. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of materials and samples. The JSM-7600F features a field emission electron source, which enables the generation of a high-brightness electron beam for improved resolution and contrast. The microscope is capable of operating at accelerating voltages up to 30 kV and offers a range of advanced features and capabilities for various applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using jsm 7600f feg sem

1

Comprehensive Structural and Electrochemical Characterization of Ni-Co LDH Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal lattice structure of the synthesized material is investigated by powdered X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique (PanalyticalX’Pert Pro using Kα irradiation with a wavelength of 0.1542 nm) at a scan speed of 4°min−1. The functional groups are identified using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (3000 Hyperion Microscope with Vertex 80 FTIR System, Bruker). The surface morphologies and nanostructures of the synthesized materials is characterized using a Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FEG-SEM, JEOL JSM-7600F FEG-SEM) and a High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscope (HR-TEM) equipped with an Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The vibrational modes of the materials are probed by Raman spectroscopy (Witec 300 RAS). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of samples is performed using TGA Q500, (TA instrument).
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD)measurements are performed in a three electrode configuration using Biologic SP-300. The working electrodes (Ni–Co LDH, Ni–Co LDH@rGO)are fabricated using a mixture of 80 wt% of the active material, 10 wt% of polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) and 10 wt% of carbon black. Ethanol is used as solvent. The prepared electrode slurry is pasted on Ni substrate and dried in vacuum at 80 °C. 3 M aqueous KOH is used as electrolyte. The mass loadings of the electrode is about 4 mg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LSPR Probe Preparation via Coverslip Functionalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The standard glass coverslip
was functionalized by the silanization method,73 (link) using 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) solution (Supporting Information S2, Figure S1) and placed
on the prism surface to prepare LSPR probes. First, the absorption
spectrum of de-ionized (DI) water was taken as a reference for AuNPs,
later this DI was replaced by 40 μL AuNPs (∼50 nm size)
solution (AuNP synthesis details are given in Supporting Information S2, Figure S2). The purple-red color
of nanoparticles inside the sample cavity starts diminishing when
nanoparticles began slowly attaching to the active amine sites (Supporting Information S2, Figure S3). It was
observed that the LSPR absorption peak became sharp and prominent
with time and no peak broadening or any secondary peak was observed
throughout the immobilization period (Figure 1b). Initially, the absorbance dynamics of
nanoparticles increased very fast and slowed down when it reached
the steady state (inset image in Figure 1b). Then, the unbound AuNPs were removed
carefully by washing the cavity with DI water without disturbing the
LSPR peak and finally the final absorbance was found to be 0.42 units
in DI water medium. The nanoparticle density was estimated from scanning
electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL; JSM-7600F FEG-SEM) micrograph (Supporting Information S2, Figure S4) to be 117
to 130 nanoparticles/μm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural and Optical Analysis of Cu-Fe2O3@g-C3N4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction was utilized to identify the phase of a composite material comprising Cu doped Fe2O3@g-C3N4. A Philips diffractometer was employed with X-ray radiation at a wavelength of 1.540 Å at room temperature. X-ray photoelectron spectra were captured using a Prevac XPS system designed for ambient pressure. It featured a VG Scienta SAX 100 emission controller monochromator and an Al Ka anode with an energy of 1486.6 eV in transmission lens mode. The morphology analysis of the composite could be conducted using the JEOL JSM-7600F, FEG-SEM. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the synthesized product were obtained with a JEOL JEM-2200 FS Transmission Electron Microscope equipped with a field emission gun. Optical investigation was carried out using a Shimadzu model 1800 UV-visible spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Microbial Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dialyzed samples were subjected to Dynamic light scattering (DLS) to measure the particle size using Nano ZS series Malvern Zetasizer. The lyophilized samples of the nanoparticles were imaged under JEOL JSM-7600F FEG-SEM to study the morphology and size of the individual nanoparticles. The lyophilized samples of the nanoparticles were also analysed for X-Ray Diffraction on a Bruker AXS Kappa APEX II CCD X-ray diffractometer operated at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu Kα radiation (1.54 Å) as a source. A continuous scan mode was applied with a step width of 0.020°, sampling time of 57.3 s and measurement temperature of 25 °C. The scanning range of 2θ was between 3° and 80°. FTIR analysis was performed using ATR-FTIR Shimadzu IRSpirit, to confirm the presence of capping agents in microbial synthesized nanoparticle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Herbarium Study of Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was based entirely on herbarium specimens. In total, 240 specimens have been examined from K, L, MICH, MO, NY, SING and additional images or on-line images provided by BM, K, MICH, P, and the JSTOR Global Plants database (plants.jstor.org). Herbarium abbreviations follow Index Herbariorum (Thiers continuously updated ). Sheets seen as digital image only are marked with “*”. Data of all the studied specimens were entered into the BRAHMS database at L for storage and further analysis of geographic distribution. All studied specimens are listed in Appendix. We have selected lectotypes whenever necessary to resolve ambiguities in the application of a name. Most of the morphological characters were examined and measured with a stereo microscope or a compound microscope. In addition to light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (using a Jeol JSM 7600F FEG-SEM) was used to study structure and ornamentation of the spores.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Morphological and Thermal Characterization of Modified PET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL JSM 7600F FEG-SEM) was used to examine the morphological characteristics of the PET, PET-hydrazide/GO and PET-hydrazide/GO after immobilization. All samples were gold-coated, held in a holder with Quanta stubs, and analyzed under a vacuum. The chemical composition of all samples was investigated using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR–FTIR, PerkinElmer Spectrum 100). Using the Shimadzu DTA/TGA-50, Japan, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen, thermogravimetric-derivative thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetry analysis (TGA-DTG and DSC) of the samples was conducted. The zeta potential of the samples was determined using dynamic light scattering (Entgris, Nicomp Nano Z3000, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Novel Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV–vis absorption spectra were
recorded on a Varian UV–visible spectrophotometer at room temperature.
Rigaku powder diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.514
Å) was used to perform PXRD spectra. Raman spectroscopy measurement
was performed using a Jobin Yvon Horiba LABRAM-HR system equipped
with a 632.8 He–Ne laser beam. TEM and HRTEM images were recorded
using Thermo Scientific, Themis 300 G3. JEOL JSM-7600F FEG-SEM with
EDS attachment was used to collect SEM images. XPS (Axis Supra Model,
SHIMADZU group) used to record XPS data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Morphological Assessment of Plant Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological characters were examined in the field and on herbarium specimens, and using Light (LM) and

Scanning Electron microscopy

(SEM)
. For LM, small parts of rhizome and lamina were boiled in water until they sank, and then either sectioned on a Reichert slide microtome or mounted whole without staining in glycerine jelly, and photographed using a Zeiss V20 or a Zeiss AxioImager M2 with an MRc5 digital camera and AxioVision software (Zeiss). For SEM spores were sputter-coated with 10 nm Platinum/Palladium (80/20) in a Quorum Q150TS sputter-coater, and observed with a Jeol JSM 7600F FEG-SEM. For the conservation assessment,

Area of Occupancy

(AOO)
and

Extent of Occurrence

(EOO)
were estimated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011 (link)), with default settings for grid size. The specimens collected by Khine et al. and Miehe et al. are kept at the Faculty of Geography, Philipps University of Marburg, with duplicates distributed to L, RAF and SING (abbreviations according to Thiers, continuously updated).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SEM and EDX Analysis of Ce-LDH Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the Ce-LDH precipitate and different catalysts, loaded with Pd and Ni and calcined at 500 °C, are examined via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The SEM images are recorded on an FEI Quanta FEG 200 (Fei, Hilboro, OR, USA). Additionally, SEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) measurements and mappings for Pd and Ni were recorded using the FEI Quanta FEG 200, fitted with an EDAX Genesis 4000 EX system, and a Jeol JSM-7600F FEG SEM (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with Oxford X-Max EDX spectrometer, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Calcined CTO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The room-temperature X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on well-ground specimens using a PANalytical X-ray diffractometer. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) data were collected using a Field Emission Gun FEG-SEM (JEOL JSM-7600F FEG-SEM).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were carried out using a JEOL JEM2200FS EFTEM/STEM instrument.
Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) was performed by FEG-TEM. Magnetic moments versus temperature and magnetic field were measured using a SQUID vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The magnetic measurements were carried out in zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling warming Fig. 2 The TEM-EDS mapping of pristine and calcined (400 1C and 500 1C) CTO.
(FCW) processes. In the ZFC process, the specimen was cooled down to 2 K (from 300 K) in the absence of a magnetic field and then a field was applied. The data were collected during warming. In the FCW process, the specimen was cooled in the presence of a magnetic field and the data were collected during warming without switching off the applied magnetic field.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!