The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using c18 column

1

Gossypol Quantification in Cottonseed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cottonseed samples were dried at 30 °C to constant weight for 2–3 days, and then ground with a grinder to a powder. Standard gossypol solutions were prepared by dissolving 0.01 g HPLC-grade gossypol in 10 mL of acetone. Standard gossypol solution of 0.010, 0.050, 0.100, 0.200, 0.500, 0.800, 1.000 and 2.000 mL were added into 10 mL volumetric flasks and adjusted to the calibration using acetone to prepare the different levels of gossypol solutions. Similarly, 0.1 g of sample was suspended into 2 mL acetone. In addition, the sample solutions were maintained in an ultrasonic bath for 45 min. Subsequently, the suspensions were filtered through quantitative filter paper followed by filtration with a 0.45 μm syringe filter (Agela, Newark, USA). The sediment was washed three times with acetone. Then, the extraction was adjusted to 10 mL with acetone.
The HPLC analysis was performed using an Agilent 1100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA), equipped with an auto-sampler and UV detection. A C18 column (Dikma, Richmond Hill, USA) (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was deployed as the stationary phase. The mobile phase consisted of Methanol/0.2% H3PO4 (80/20, v/v). The injection volume was 10 μL, and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The UV detector was set at 238 nm, and the temperature was set at 25 °C. The samples were measured in triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of AZL in CD-MOF by HPLC-UV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of AZL was determined by high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC-UV, Agilent 1290, Agilent Technologies, USA). Analysis was carried out with a C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Dikma, USA) operating at 30 °C. The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile, water and glacial acetic acid (50:50:1, v/v/v) delivered at 1.0 mL/min. Analyses were carried at 254 nm wavelength with 20 μL injection volume. Data were collected by Chemstation version B.04.03 software (Agilent Technologies, USA). In these conditions, the drug retention time ranged within 7.2–7.5 min. Effective drug contents were calculated from a linear calibration curve (r = 0.9999) established in the 0.25 to 100 μg/mL concentration range.
AZL loading was measured by dissolving 5 mg of sample in 10 mL of water and methanol solvent (1:1, v/v), the centrifuged solution was analyzed by HPLC-UV. The presence of CD-MOF did not interfere with the HPLC analysis of the drug. The AZL loading percentage was calculated according to the following Eq. (1): AZLloading%=AZLdeterminedinCDMOFWeightofAZL/CDMOF×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Release of Amphotericin B

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The release profile of AmB was analyzed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 5.8 and 6.8, each containing Tween-80, 0.5:100, w/v). A total of 1 mL of each sample was placed in a dialysis bag (molecular weight cut off 3.5 KDa). The dialysis bag was inserted in 20 mL of PBS with gentle shaking (100 rpm) in a water bath at 37°C. At specific time intervals, 0.5 mL of each sample was withdrawn from the external aqueous solution, and an equal amount of the dissolution medium was added in order to maintain sink conditions. Subsequently, the concentration of AmB released at various times up to 8 h was determined by HPLC. This analysis was performed on a Dikma C18 column (250×4.6 mm, 5 μm) with the injection volume of 20 μL, with acetonitrile:10 mmol sodium acetate aqueous solution (40:60) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The detector was at the wavelength of 408 nm, and the column temperature was set at 30°C. All release experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Semipreparative HPLC for Compound Enrichment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For enrichment of specific fraction, HPLC system with semipreparative column (Dikma, Diamonsil, C18 column, 10.0 × 250 mm2, 5 μm) was applied. The injection volume was 20 μL. As soon as the target peak appeared, the peak fraction was collected into another flask separately until the collection wascompleted. Repeating the above procedure described above, the target peaks were completely fished from the total components peaks. The collected fractions were evaporated and redissolved in 1 mL DMSO. A dilution of 1 : 1,000 using culture medium or water was applied for cell assay and analytic measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Purity for NGP-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purity of NGP-1 was confirmed through the HPLC chromatogram. After the synthesized compound was dissolved in ACN and filtered with a microporous membrane, the resulting sample was subjected to an HPLC-DAD device (ELITE LaChrom, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a C18 column (Dikma, Beijing, China), L-2455 DAD detector, and L-2130 pump. The other chromatographic conditions are listed in Table 2. After generating the chromatogram, the areas of the peaks were integrated, and the purity was determined using the area normalization method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolite Extraction and HPLC Analysis of Physcomitrella patens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gametophores of P. patens were fully ground in liquid nitrogen. The sample (0.3 g) was dissolved with 5 mL methanol. After centrifugation (4,000 rpm, 10 min) of the extract, the supernatant was concentrated and rinsed with 4 mL 0.2% acetic acid containing cyclohexane (1:1, v/v). The mixture was subjected to MCI GEL CHP 20P (Sigma-Aldrich) resin solid-phase extraction column, and ethanol was used as eluent. The extraction was filtered with a 0.22 μm ultrafiltration membrane (Pall Corp., Port Washington). Then the analysis was carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with a photodiode array detector (Agilent 1,200 system). The experiment was under the following conditions: C18 column (4.6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm, Dikma Technologies, Beijing); injection volume, 20 µL; column temperature, 35 °C; flow rate, 1.0 mL/min; solvent system, acetonitrile (A): 0.2% acetic acid (B) with gradient elution. The gradient conditions were 3% A for 6 min, then a linear gradient to 90% over 65 min, and the detection wavelength was 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification and Encapsulation Efficiency of Nanocomplexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC was used to analyze the EE (%) and DLE (%) of nanocomplexes. The obtained nanocomplexes were centrifuged at 4 °C at 143,000× g for 15 min to remove free SF. The free SF concentration was determined using HPLC. Chromatographic conditions: C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm, Dikma, Beijing, China); Mobile phase: acetonitrile: water = 75:25 (v/v); Detection wavelength: 265 nm; Column temperature: 25 °C; Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; Injection volume: 30 μL. The encapsulation efficiency (EE %) and drug load efficiency (DLE %) of nanocomplexes were calculated as follows: EE (%)=(Total amount of SF-Amount of free SFTotal amount of SF)×100%
DLE (%)=(Total amount of SF-Amount of free SFTotal weight of DEN-TAT-PFC/SF/siRNA)×100%
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimization of C18 Column Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We tested the method with different columns, including Waters Symmetry C18 column, Xbridge C18 column, Cosmosil C18 column, Dikma C18 column, and Grace Alltima C18 column, all with dimensions 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, under different temperatures, including 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C.
The following conditions were set: solvent A: acetonitrile, solvent B: 0.1% (v/v), 0.05% (v/v), and 0.2% (v/v) phosphoric acid; injection volume: 10 µL; flow rate: 1 mL/min; detector: photodiode array detector (PDA); mobile phase: 0–12 min, 75%–65% solvent B; 12–50 min, 65%–40% solvent B; 50–60 min, 40%–20% solvent B; 60–65 min, 20%–10% solvent B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of DXM Loading in Prodrug NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The drug loading coefficient of DXM was determined by HPLC after hydrolyzing DPM prodrug NPs by the acid hydrolysis method. The pH of DPM prodrug NPs was adjusted to 1.0 with hydrochloric acid. Then the solution was hydrolyzed at 37 °C for 48 h at 100 rpm. The DXM loading coefficient was determined by HPLC under the conditions as follows: HPLC column (Dikma, C18 column), mobile phase acetonitrile: water = 60:40, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, column temperature 30 °C, and detection wavelength 240 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC Analysis of PTX-VE Encapsulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EE and LE of PTX-VE in the mixed micelles were determined by HPLC. The HPLC system was equipped with a SPD-10AVP ultraviolet light detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a C18 column (4.6×150 mm, 5 μm; Dikma, Tianjin, China). The column was eluted with methanol/water (97:3, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. PTX-VE was detected at 227 nm and the sample injection volume was kept constant at 20 μL. Each run was done in triplicate. The EE (%) and LE (%) of the mixed micelles were calculated by the following equations:
EE(%)=Weight of drug encapsulated in micellesWeight of total drug×100%
LE(%)=Weight of drug encapsulated in micellesWeight of drug and carrier×100%
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!